this post was submitted on 05 Mar 2025
598 points (98.5% liked)

Canada

8706 readers
1441 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


πŸ—ΊοΈ Provinces / Territories


πŸ™οΈ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


πŸ’ SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


πŸ’» Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


πŸ’΅ Finance, Shopping, Sales


πŸ—£οΈ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Zer0_F0x@lemmy.world 139 points 5 days ago (2 children)

The US can remotely disable them whenever they damn well please anyway, and can not be trusted not to.

Everyone should be canceling their orders immediately, and disable the remote access capabilities to the ones they have.

[–] wise_pancake@lemmy.ca 80 points 5 days ago

Nobody should have ever purchased military equipment with that feature.

[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 33 points 5 days ago (3 children)

Has it actually been confirmed they can do this? I would assume they backdoor them, but usually backdoors are secret.

[–] Shadow@lemmy.ca 39 points 5 days ago (1 children)

They require software updates for every mission, that are distributed from the US.

You can probably fly / use it without those, but you lose all the advanced command & control features

[–] piccolo@sh.itjust.works 16 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Let me guess... microsoft designed it.

[–] Makhno@lemmy.world 16 points 5 days ago

"It's military-grade"

[–] Brumefey@sh.itjust.works 11 points 5 days ago (1 children)

« You need to take off RIGHT NOW!Β Β» « I can’t . Upgrade in progress !Β Β»

[–] No1@aussie.zone 13 points 5 days ago

Post on TechHelp:

"I keep hearing the missile connecting and disconnecting.

Has anyone got the latest driver for a Sidewinder AIM-9L?"

[–] ohulancutash@feddit.uk 23 points 5 days ago (5 children)

They don’t function without phoning home to a US-controlled server every 24 hours.

[–] ramble81@lemm.ee 17 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Give is to Empress, she’ll knock out a crack in no time.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de 9 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

Some high ranking US intelligence dude said something along the lines of that yeah. I dont think anyone has hacked into one of them to check or reverse engineer the code tho.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] hddsx@lemmy.ca 60 points 5 days ago

American here. Who cares if it provokes Trump? Actions have consequences. Canada helped out a lot during 911. What did we do? Prove to be an unreliable partner

[–] Remember_the_tooth@lemmy.world 59 points 5 days ago (1 children)

With tariffs hammering F-35 sales, I expect the next Eurofighter project will have a lot more resources. I wonder if Canada will get involved.

[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 46 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Sweden also offered to get us building our own Gripens totally locally. The page for the bid is even still up

I assume we already have pilots trained in flying the F-35 at this point, which sucks if we're never getting them, though.

[–] wirebeads@lemmy.ca 14 points 5 days ago (1 children)

This would be amazing for us to bring back military building here in Canada!!

[–] HellsBelle@sh.itjust.works 11 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

Especially since the Americans are the ones who convinced us they had enough fighter jets to take care of us so we could/should cancel the Arrow. :/

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] frostythesnowman@lemmy.ca 10 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Absolute bozo move to not go for this in retrospect. They need to give this a look again asap

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] merc@sh.itjust.works 53 points 5 days ago

Any NATO member increasing their military spending would be idiotic to spend their money with US-based companies.

[–] arotrios@lemmy.world 41 points 5 days ago (4 children)

Nah, y'all should accept delivery then refuse to pay. Give him a taste of his own medicine.

[–] ReanuKeeves@lemm.ee 45 points 5 days ago (1 children)

So take the planes, send Trump the bill, when he acts confused you tell him he should really be more grateful about this

[–] Quill7513@slrpnk.net 28 points 5 days ago

"have you said thank you even once"

[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 15 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

I mean, without American replacement parts I don't know how flyable they are. Stiffing the US on something is an option for next play, though.

Edit: So, correction. Interestingly it looks like the US is actually dependent on others for parts itself, and Japan has a good helping of all the parts in the whole plane being built domestically, so maybe not all is lost there. (This link looks legit, but disclaimer that I'm unfamiliar with it and you can't always tell at a glance post-AI)

That being said, the software is definitely closed-source, and all their design.

[–] shittydwarf@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 5 days ago

A Trump never pays his debts

load more comments (1 replies)

The aircraft has significant security risks for sure and makes sense to cancel. But canceling the order won't be on Trump's radar unless it affects his inner circle of evil billionaires who have funneled dark money to him.

[–] RaskolnikovsAxe@lemmy.ca 37 points 5 days ago (15 children)

Goddamn right we should. Take the French up on the offer to build the Rafale here. Or the Swedes. And get a few demo units for short term.

Fuck 'em on any cancellation fees too. Consider it partial compensation for the ridiculous trade war.

load more comments (15 replies)
[–] humanspiral@lemmy.ca 36 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

100% TODAY! Do not pay a fucking dime of any amount owing for these. (good job on Globe and Mail for a change)

FYI, the Israeli version of F35 does not have this "US permission for every flight required"

F35 is a POS plane, with low uptime, in addition to "broken ownership". Even US military does not get manuals on how to repair/maintain them and must hire Lockheed consultants to do the job. The whole program was a boondoggle to pay Lockheed the most money possible instead of getting good military equipment, and any corrupt POS that was involved in approving this purchase for Canada should be jailed for treason.

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 14 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (7 children)

There's nothing stopping Canada from getting the manuals and patching the software. Most of the FUD about it's performance abilities is propaganda. So getting them and just locking out Lockheed and the US would be a pretty good middle finger too.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] redlemace@lemmy.world 33 points 5 days ago (11 children)

As should europe. Clearly you can't trust the USA anymore. What is the long-term prospect for spare parts?

[–] Iceman@lemmy.world 9 points 5 days ago (3 children)

From what I've heard you need a password that changes on the daily to start a F-35 and that the US are the only ones that can provide it. If that is true, it's a tremendous oversite for any sovereign state.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (10 replies)
[–] opi@lemmy.ca 29 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

I don't think Canada should be basing their defense decisions on the opinion and thin skin of the American government. Trying to force Canada, in any way, to purchase F35's is fishy - not that that's happening, of course.

Canada's interests are for Canada. Not them. Also, maybe Canada should reboot their ventures into the Avro Arrow program again. That'll ruffle some feathers. Canadian engineered military = quite formidable, I think.

[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 13 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Canadian engineered military = quite formidable, I think.

Here's the bad news. It's not. Sure, we're good at peacekeeping, and we deploy to support (militarily) our allies. But we're using US gear and we're woefully underfunded because war budget has been declared a waste by even the parties who strut and posture about a strong military. We only needed to fulfill our NATO obligations, for decades, and even that has been a struggle we haven't won consistently with the low budget.

And while we're skilled enough and gung-ho, and our 1st Pioneers are about the most scary bunch of lumberjack commandos you'll ever see, there's just so few of them, and again their gear has been called old and out of repair by every administration campaigning because the last one never did a thing about it.

We're gonna need a lot of funding and training and gear to make up the shortfall in people and powpow toys, and that's a slice of gov pork that Milhouse is gonna latch onto knowing that he doesn't need an army once he gives the country over. Justin doesn't want to spend that, but he - and please God let it be Mark next - is really gonna have to.

But how do we sell it to the "hair guy bad" flatlanders steeped in 12 years of hating Justin for not being a pseudo-aristocratic milquetoast conservative?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Gammelfisch@lemmy.world 26 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

Canada should cancel the F-35 contract and their are better fighter jets from reliable NATO allies. The F-35 is a $2 trillion USD turd that is still not 100%. If Canada continues to purchase US weapons, this would be like Poland buying weapons from Nazi Germany. I am hoping the US MIC becomes pissed off.

[–] Maiq@lemy.lol 14 points 5 days ago

2 trillion is a fuckload of drones!

[–] Franklin@lemmy.ca 23 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

ooh no, it might provoke the person who is back stabbing us at every conceivable opportunity

[–] Tramort@programming.dev 20 points 5 days ago

Hell yeah they should. We need to be able to defend ourselves against southern aggression, and the F35 is compromised based on what Trump himself threatened.

[–] yannic@lemmy.ca 12 points 5 days ago

The PM agrees with The Globe and Mail once and now they think they'll get two in a row?

[–] FireRetardant@lemmy.world 10 points 5 days ago (7 children)

With a potential for an american invasion on the table, I wouldn't want to cancel that deal without another similar plane deal lined up

[–] Letstakealook@lemm.ee 37 points 5 days ago (2 children)

While I do not believe the US will actually invade Canada, I don't imagine the F35 would be much help in that situation. I am sure there are remote access capabilities to cease their operation, at the very least.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 13 points 5 days ago (1 children)

While I do not believe the US will actually invade Canada

Until a few weeks ago I did not believe the US would impose tariffs on Canada or call it the "51st state," so...

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] SlopppyEngineer@lemmy.world 11 points 5 days ago (1 children)

You have to enter a password to start up the F35. That password changes every day and USA needs to give these passwords. Locking a country out of the plane is as simple as stop sending the new passwords.

[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 9 points 5 days ago

Hmm, opinions on the internet on if that's true are mixed at best. It's a level of control I'd be shocked anyone would accept. Someone on Quora is saying most countries weren't even happy Lockheed Martin manages the supply chain and maintenance software.

[–] Quill7513@slrpnk.net 21 points 5 days ago (4 children)

the potential for an invasion is precisely the reason you don't want the f-35 around. that warbird is the most technologically dependent device ever crafted for warfare. it is deeply vulnerable to an adversary with the knowledge simply bricking it remotely and you're kidding yourself if you don't think the us military wouldn't brick all of them. the better plan is to train with prior gen jets and asymmetric combat using drones.

[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 15 points 5 days ago

Don't forget the Gripen. There's a great offer for domestic production still on the table, and it's the asymmetric stall-an-invasion fighter.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)

Existing provokes Trump.

load more comments
view more: next β€Ί