RaskolnikovsAxe

joined 10 months ago
[–] RaskolnikovsAxe@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

Yes torrent and file-sharing in most cases violates copyright and is therefore illegal.

That fact won't stop people, especially teens, from doing it. But it is a fact.

As with most things involving kids, open, healthy and honest communication is the best way. If you don't have that then no constraints will really contain them, they will find a way around them, they will sneak around behind your back, and you will lose their trust.

Edit - I'm curious, do you believe it's acceptable to spank children?

[–] RaskolnikovsAxe@lemmy.ca 1 points 15 hours ago (2 children)

If they implement age verification on porn sites, what will be the other nonillegal ways to get porn without ID?

[–] RaskolnikovsAxe@lemmy.ca 1 points 18 hours ago (4 children)

Collecting and reselling any data is far easier done by a website than it would be by the corner LCBO.

But did you or did you not say the LCBO scans the ID and sells the data? I have to admit I've never seen that happen. What do they scan it with?

Anyway there is no way to argue that handing a guy your ID for a glance to buy cigs, weed or alcohol is less safe than uploading to some random porn site on the internet, even if they didn't store your data (and I believe strongly that they would store your data for documenting the verification... either they would, or the third party that does the service)

[–] RaskolnikovsAxe@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

This bill is garbage.

If it's protecting teens, believe me they know how to sail the high seas.

This is puritan security state nonsense. It's meant to appeal to the socons

[–] RaskolnikovsAxe@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 day ago (6 children)

Do you have proof that the LCBO or gas stations scan and resell your ID?

That sounds like the very definition of 'big if true'.

[–] RaskolnikovsAxe@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

In today's western democracies leader cults and charismatic authoritarianism tends to cluster on the right, not the left, despite what the "both sides!" people want to believe.

Donald Trump is the obvious endpoint of pseudopopulist anti-intellectual conservatism. Thankfully the US got there first, so we can all see where the conservatives around the world are headed.

[–] RaskolnikovsAxe@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 day ago

I believe the majority of reasonable Canadians want to reach a just and fair reconciliation that rights the wrongs of the past. Any reconciliation that we expect to be done in mutual goodwill must consider the other innocent parties as well.

If private land is affected, then the land owners releasing title need to be fairly compensated by the government. That is the true and total cost of reconciliation.

Many people in this country are sympathetic to righting the wrongs of the past, but they are not going to destroy their own lives to do it. Let's not forget that ancestry and history do not change the fact that people born in this country, whether indigenous or not, have known nothing other than this country, it is their home no less and no more than anyone else born here, and they have nowhere else to go.

There also needs to be a very transparent and clear timeline and total cost for reconciliation with a clear endpoint milestone.

Fighting against these things will simply create an expanding group of malcontents that will eventually have enough political power to push back in highly unproductive ways.

The unusual twist on this situation is that it appears that the people who may have any real sway in pressuring the government to understand the above seem to be the indigenous groups themselves.

[–] RaskolnikovsAxe@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 day ago

Well we don't have a respectable conservative party in this country that could push back, especially since this is exactly what they would have proposed.

But a few questions:

What provisions would likely be in danger of override?

Is there any regulatory efficiency measures that would be acceptable?

What would proper oversight look like?

[–] RaskolnikovsAxe@lemmy.ca 5 points 2 months ago

Thanks for letting me know, those guys are solid, glad to hear they did this.

[–] RaskolnikovsAxe@lemmy.ca 32 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)

Fuck yeah he did, even wrote a song about it.

This is one reason why we need a Guthrie revival. He bashed Trump's father Fred Trump in a song. We need to bring it back and update it for the son.

Woody started the lyrics for us, but he never recorded it:

I suppose
Old Man Trump knows
Just how much
Racial hate
He stirred up
In the bloodpot of human hearts
When he drawed
That color line
Here at his
Beach Haven family project

Edit to add: whatever the song becomes, it should mention protecting pedophiles.

[–] RaskolnikovsAxe@lemmy.ca 9 points 2 months ago

I doubt many of them even know that antifa is short for anti-fascist.

And even if they did find out, I highly doubt they would have the normal "are we the baddies" moment. They would rationalize it.

Then there is the proportion that are happy to be called fascists.

[–] RaskolnikovsAxe@lemmy.ca 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I fully agree with your sentiment and I have immeasurably immense respect for Americans that are fighting this. I wish them luck and we all know they'll need it.

I'm not American and the best I can do is fight the inevitable diffusion of this into my own country.

 

Firstly it gives Poilievre an honest opportunity to contribute. People want to see everyone working together, so by letting Poilievre in right away he's giving him a chance to temper the rhetoric and get work done. And if he doesn't temper the rhetoric, it's likely to work in Carney's favour. If he's seen as obstructing, it will not look good for him. It seems like a win-win-win... It looks like fair dealing, if Poilievre comes to the table honestly it works for Carney, if he doesn't it works for Carney as well. It's good politics that is both strategic in the way it encourages good cooperation and has good optics around fairness.

Secondly, the elephant in the room is the separation nonsense. Poilievre is running for a seat in the heart of separatist country, and with the separation rhetoric ramping up, better to have Poilievre - who is ideologically tied to Smith and will be representing Alberta - in the public eye as soon as possible, so he can wear this garbage. After all, Smith seems to be adept at causing no end of hassle for Poilievre. Best to put him front and centre as soon as possible so he is forced to respond to it.

 

This is just one of thousands of examples of immense disrespect. And his cult follows him along through everything.

I'm all seriousness, if you find this appealing, would you not be happier if you just move there? If you have no allegiance to this country, please be respectful, have some dignity, and don't actively try to ruin it for the rest of us. Stop trying to sabotage this country by actively undermining it.

 

Big tough oil men turn into limpwristed traitors who knuckle under when Trump calls to them. Fucking embarrassing.

Nationalize the oil already. Get the foreign corporations and their brain dead lackeys out.

 

Canada desperately needs a national strategic internet constellation.

Edit to fix link.

 

According to Reuters, Trump is preparing to remove legal status for 240000 Ukrainian immigrants, following which they will likely be deported back to a war zone.

The US continues her slide into global irrelevance, abandoning respect for democracy, the rule of law, and human rights.

It is the duty of the countries that continue to respect democracy and human rights, including Canada, to prevent these people from being forced back into a war torn country.

Edit Still getting the hang of this, created this post without the link to Reuters. Apologies, link added.

 

This is one sample visit to the conservative subreddit. It's an appalling example of the impact of disinformation. When you need to be reminded of who the enemy is and what they think, visit here. You will see that there is no gratitude or mutual respect, and there never was. There was never any concept of mutual benefit. And now, with Trump leading the cult, there truly is no depth to which they won't go, and no decisions from Trump that won't be retroactively justified.

These people are dangerous, and they don't give a shit about any alliances, friendship or partnership. And they control the levers of power.

Edit to add a screenshot. Not sure how to add more, but it doesn't get any better as you go deeper. What's clear is that this relationship is over, and we need to move on.

 

At the first Trump cabinet meeting, he stated his intentions clearly. He restated blatant lies and disinformation, and he won't really be questioned on it from the press or from any US politicians. The US is the enemy of Canada and should be understood as such. Take heed of his treatment of Ukraine - when he noted that they would lose the war without US help - and consider what he will propose when he uses the same argument on us. He makes it very clear in the video.

And very carefully consider which of our political leaders will stand up to Trump when he makes the argument that we need American military in our country to protect us.

 

Edit : Fixed the numbers (showing all voters, with Carney as Liberal leader)

 

Has anyone told him that tariffs require willing trade partners?

view more: next ›