RaskolnikovsAxe

joined 7 months ago
[–] RaskolnikovsAxe@lemmy.ca 14 points 14 hours ago

This is exactly the time to spread Charlie Kirk's videos and messages far and wide. There is no better way to celebrate the man than to let the world hear his message. It is his legacy. It was his life's work.

And the Democrats in Congress should write up the "Charlie Kirk Sensible Gun Reform Bill" with background checks and red flag laws. That's it. Surely this is the time, in the face of senseless death, to honour Charlie by bringing this bill forward.

[–] RaskolnikovsAxe@lemmy.ca 10 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Everything Charlie said in his life made it clear that he would have admonished us for caring about his death, and he would have defended the necessity of it. This is his legacy.

If you spend your life saying hateful and morally reprehensible shit you don't get to enjoy a posthumous rewrite that is entirely at odds with your life's work.

It's unfortunate that someone died and it is a disaster for the division and incipient collapse of US society. This doesn't mean Charlie was a good person, or that he will be missed, or that we should care about his particular death versus many others.

[–] RaskolnikovsAxe@lemmy.ca 27 points 1 day ago

I would have preferred the last three years of his miserable life spent in a maximum security prison, but as it seems like the law doesn't exist in the US anymore I will accept a series of strokes leading to shitting himself and collapsing on a stage in public. I'm okay with that trade.

[–] RaskolnikovsAxe@lemmy.ca 16 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Kash Patel talking about how the FBI and the federal government drove this thing to completion, but, although he perpetually looks as if he has, that dumb fucker clearly couldn't drive his thumb up his arse.

This administration is a joke.

[–] RaskolnikovsAxe@lemmy.ca 31 points 2 days ago

Hey, be respectful. This man really put his neck out for his beliefs. He offered himself as tribute to the 2nd amendment, and we should admire his conviction. The proper way to celebrate would be to honour his wishes and show zero empathy. It's the least we can do for him.

It's a rare man that has the courage to rationalize senseless violence in defense of unrestricted access to deadly weapons, and it is even rarer to literally make that the hill you die on. He showed us all by example how you truly live your creed.

[–] RaskolnikovsAxe@lemmy.ca 6 points 4 months ago

I believe you would be correct if the roles were reversed. For our sake we should be thankful they are not.

I don't want to be overly optimistic, but if we can find a way to heal our country and make a positive change in our politics, I'm all for it.

[–] RaskolnikovsAxe@lemmy.ca 9 points 4 months ago (3 children)

The difference here is that the Liberals are not the Democrats. They will stand up and push back. If Poilievre makes it about needless opposition, they will just work with the other parties and keep going. They don't need him.

But yes, I can appreciate what you say. It seems clear that the Republicans and those like them have only ever paid lip service to good faith and respectful dialogue, and they've never done anything but take advantage of anyone who offers them goodwill. I can see this starting in western Canada, and I do believe Poilievre is cut from the same cloth. But I think Carney has a strategic advantage here and it doesn't disadvantage him to at least try to create a better environment. Hard liners won't change, but Canada seems to have softer support in the centre and they generally prefer civil politics.

[–] RaskolnikovsAxe@lemmy.ca 3 points 4 months ago

If the Liberals take electoral reform it will be yet another massive Conservative fumble.

[–] RaskolnikovsAxe@lemmy.ca 15 points 4 months ago

It would be by far the funniest funniest thing.

[–] RaskolnikovsAxe@lemmy.ca 6 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Yeah that's fair. He's not above politicking, in fact I'm sure his decisions weigh many factors, politics being one of them.

On the topic, I hope that the left doesn't build a personality cult around him. He's not particularly charismatic, he's just a technocrat with skills that can help us. Let the man do his job without deifying him. We don't need more populism right now, we need experts... and we sure don't need celebrity politicians.

[–] RaskolnikovsAxe@lemmy.ca 6 points 4 months ago (4 children)

I'm not religious, but I feel like this is somehow extra super duper disrespectful. Religious folk are not known for their tolerance of false or satirical iconography.

But I guess he's insulting Catholics so it's probably totally cool with his evangelical base. Oh who am I kidding, he could make AI scat porn with their Lord and Saviour and they'd find a passage in the Bible that supports it.

 

Firstly it gives Poilievre an honest opportunity to contribute. People want to see everyone working together, so by letting Poilievre in right away he's giving him a chance to temper the rhetoric and get work done. And if he doesn't temper the rhetoric, it's likely to work in Carney's favour. If he's seen as obstructing, it will not look good for him. It seems like a win-win-win... It looks like fair dealing, if Poilievre comes to the table honestly it works for Carney, if he doesn't it works for Carney as well. It's good politics that is both strategic in the way it encourages good cooperation and has good optics around fairness.

Secondly, the elephant in the room is the separation nonsense. Poilievre is running for a seat in the heart of separatist country, and with the separation rhetoric ramping up, better to have Poilievre - who is ideologically tied to Smith and will be representing Alberta - in the public eye as soon as possible, so he can wear this garbage. After all, Smith seems to be adept at causing no end of hassle for Poilievre. Best to put him front and centre as soon as possible so he is forced to respond to it.

 

This is just one of thousands of examples of immense disrespect. And his cult follows him along through everything.

I'm all seriousness, if you find this appealing, would you not be happier if you just move there? If you have no allegiance to this country, please be respectful, have some dignity, and don't actively try to ruin it for the rest of us. Stop trying to sabotage this country by actively undermining it.

 

Big tough oil men turn into limpwristed traitors who knuckle under when Trump calls to them. Fucking embarrassing.

Nationalize the oil already. Get the foreign corporations and their brain dead lackeys out.

 

Canada desperately needs a national strategic internet constellation.

Edit to fix link.

 

According to Reuters, Trump is preparing to remove legal status for 240000 Ukrainian immigrants, following which they will likely be deported back to a war zone.

The US continues her slide into global irrelevance, abandoning respect for democracy, the rule of law, and human rights.

It is the duty of the countries that continue to respect democracy and human rights, including Canada, to prevent these people from being forced back into a war torn country.

Edit Still getting the hang of this, created this post without the link to Reuters. Apologies, link added.

 

This is one sample visit to the conservative subreddit. It's an appalling example of the impact of disinformation. When you need to be reminded of who the enemy is and what they think, visit here. You will see that there is no gratitude or mutual respect, and there never was. There was never any concept of mutual benefit. And now, with Trump leading the cult, there truly is no depth to which they won't go, and no decisions from Trump that won't be retroactively justified.

These people are dangerous, and they don't give a shit about any alliances, friendship or partnership. And they control the levers of power.

Edit to add a screenshot. Not sure how to add more, but it doesn't get any better as you go deeper. What's clear is that this relationship is over, and we need to move on.

 

At the first Trump cabinet meeting, he stated his intentions clearly. He restated blatant lies and disinformation, and he won't really be questioned on it from the press or from any US politicians. The US is the enemy of Canada and should be understood as such. Take heed of his treatment of Ukraine - when he noted that they would lose the war without US help - and consider what he will propose when he uses the same argument on us. He makes it very clear in the video.

And very carefully consider which of our political leaders will stand up to Trump when he makes the argument that we need American military in our country to protect us.

 

Edit : Fixed the numbers (showing all voters, with Carney as Liberal leader)

view more: next ›