this post was submitted on 04 Dec 2025
241 points (99.2% liked)

News

33393 readers
2537 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

A new national survey conducted by conservative think tank Manhattan Institute found that Millennial Republicans are more likely to call themselves racist than Baby Boomer Republicans.

A total of 34% of Republican survey respondents between the ages of 30 and 49 answered “I am such person” when asked for their views on individuals who openly express racist views. Only 3% of Republican survey respondents over the age of 65 answered “I am such person.”

A total of 23% of Republican survey respondents between the ages of 18 and 29 and 6% between the ages of 50 to 64 also answered “I am such person.”

top 39 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] nocturne@piefed.social 163 points 20 hours ago (5 children)

Could it also be that boomers, while racist, do not consider themselves to be racist? My racist boomer father would tell you he absolutely is not racist, but that everyone loves a racist joke.

[–] KickMeElmo@sopuli.xyz 42 points 19 hours ago

That's how I read it to begin with.

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 26 points 18 hours ago

thats basically it.

[–] Sektor@lemmy.world 6 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

You can make mental gymnastics why it is so, but the fact is that ye old boomers grew up in a racist world and is expected from them to be racist. Le millennials had 50 years of efforts and sacrifices to make the world less racist.

[–] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 hours ago

There are still areas in the South where people grow up in a racist world. Family are racist, friends are racist, school if not actively racist is doing nothing to dissuade it.

[–] Whats_your_reasoning@lemmy.world 3 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago) (1 children)

My mom refuses to admit that she’s racist.

Oh, but when I brought a black man home, she asked me afterwards, “Why do all your boyfriends have… a tan?”

Don’t worry, I let it out on her. I’m practically 100% Slavic if my brother’s DNA test is to be trusted (it lines up with the family tree I’ve got, so yeah.) I asked if she’d rather I marry a “nice Polish boy” that I have nothing in common with, like she did, like her sisters did, like her mother did. Because why should personal compatibility matter so long as our ancestries are the same?

She backed off and hasn’t made a peep about my “tan” partners ever since.

[–] NeilBru@lemmy.world 2 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago) (2 children)

They think compatibility comes from ethnicity. Because of shared cultural and sanguinary heritage from Poland, your likelihood of sharing the same values, life goals, sense of humor, and physical attraction with a Polish partner is higher.

While that would seem outwardly true, the reality is that most countries around the world aren't as ethnically and culturally homogeneous anymore, compared to generations past.

Personally, I think it's a good thing. Homogeneity, in nature, leads to genetic stagnation and degradation.

[–] Whats_your_reasoning@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

I get that, for my parents’ generation at least. But I’m the weirdo autistic chick that lives multiple “alternative lifestyles” simultaneously.

I don’t go to the church I was baptized in, because I’m atheist. I don’t eat the food my culture cooks, because I’m vegan. I’m a pansexual who practices polyamory. I don’t share my parents’ values, nor those of my ancestral culture.

Which is partly why I gel better with people who don’t share the “dominant” culture around us (in the US.) I get along with others who’ve been marginalized, who don’t “fit in,” who ~~want to burn down capitalism~~ have been on the “outside” for so long that we share a common bond through it. Most people I’ve dated have either been born in other countries and/or have disabilities. It makes sense for me, but from the outside it’s easy to imagine that my mom thinks I’m still “rebelling” somehow (while deep into my 30s.)

[–] Duamerthrax@lemmy.world 1 points 38 minutes ago
[–] moderatecentrist@feddit.uk 1 points 1 hour ago

Maybe. But I think it's worrying if young people are now feeling more emboldened about being racist.

[–] Garbagio@lemmy.zip 35 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Alternative title: Millennial Republicans More Honest Than Boomer Contemporaries, Study Finds

[–] Rekorse@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 hour ago

It means millenials are actively deciding to be racist rather than it just being a result of upbringing.

[–] human@slrpnk.net 34 points 19 hours ago (4 children)

What the fuck is this entire sentence?

David Hirsch, former Republican candidate for New York State Assembly, on X: “While there are a lot of positives in this poll, there are some disturbing trends being influenced by the Woke Right like rising Holocaust Denialism, and that 12% are antisemitic and 19% accept them. We can fix this and other issues.”

[–] Doubleohdonut@lemmy.ca 12 points 14 hours ago (3 children)

The Woke Right? Isn't that firstly an oxymoron, and secondly a label they would never self-apply?

[–] delgato@sh.itjust.works 9 points 14 hours ago

Bibi used the term pejoratively when talking about MAGA folks who were criticizing Israel recently. Don’t know the term’s origins though, I’ve been seeing it more lately.

[–] chuckleslord@lemmy.world 5 points 14 hours ago

Woke right is groypers because they're "critical of Israel". Cause they're nazis

[–] Itdidnttrickledown@lemmy.world 1 points 53 minutes ago

The Woke Right?

That is trump nodding off at a meeting.

[–] atzanteol@sh.itjust.works 8 points 18 hours ago

That is some premium copium.

[–] bearboiblake@pawb.social 3 points 1 hour ago

Yeah this is just because woke means nothing coherent to right wingers. To the left, it means to be aware of systemic problems such as racism and the class war. To the right, it just means "person I disagree with"

[–] Saapas@piefed.zip 2 points 10 hours ago

Woke Right huh

[–] Timecircleline@sh.itjust.works 26 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

I think this is also a reflection on self awareness.

[–] bigfondue@lemmy.world 20 points 12 hours ago

Big "I'm not racist, but..." energy from boomers

[–] DaMummy@lemmy.world 22 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Why would a millennial identify as a boomer?

[–] Saapas@piefed.zip 1 points 10 hours ago

Isn't that what we are to zoomers hah

[–] PattyMcB@lemmy.world 21 points 10 hours ago

"Republicans are racist" ftfy

[–] Kn1ghtDigital@lemmy.zip 21 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

If anyone my age says they're a racist to my face I will punch teeth in.

[–] RaoulDuke85@piefed.social 11 points 16 hours ago

They probably don't have a lot of teeth to begin with.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 19 points 19 hours ago (2 children)

I'm not at all surprised by this, TBH. For all the dunking there is on boomers, they spent their formative years during the Civil Rights era, no?

And Gen Y (at least the younger ones) spent their formative years just when things like social media and forums and so on really got going. Where people are and have been trying to curate and groom more white supremacists. Often behind screen names, etc...

[–] ech@lemmy.ca 5 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago) (1 children)

It's not that boomers aren't racist, they just don't believe they're racist. Their version of racism is very narrow, basically limited to calling for the outright murder of all black people. Anything short of that is just "normal" in their eyes.

Millenials have grown up with a more nuanced definition, though, so those racists understand that they're racist and also know how to hide and obscure it.

[–] SupahRevs@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago

There is much more nuance these days. Some anti-racist literature even says that we are all racist but that we can work on not being prejudice. These books will say that part of being anti-racist is seeing that racism exists in lots of ways and that we shouldn't be denying that these things exist, we should be working on reducing the harm from it.

[–] mycodesucks@lemmy.world 3 points 17 hours ago
[–] tomi000@lemmy.world 9 points 2 hours ago

Seems obvious. Boomers are racist but dont even know it. Millennials who are racist choose to be.

[–] Fedizen@lemmy.world 6 points 2 hours ago

Now ask both groups if they believe dinosaurs existed for millions of years.

[–] Itdidnttrickledown@lemmy.world 1 points 59 minutes ago

Boomers aren't racist in their own eyes because to them what they say is just the way it is. They didn't make themselves better than all 'those' people. Its just the way things are. The flip side of that is I've heard some brown skin people make the same claims that they can't be racist and only white folks can be racist. Far fewer of them though than these heaving slack jawed maga idiots I have to walk around in walmart because they are way too important to be polite.

[–] Smoogs@lemmy.world 1 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

So do we actually care anymore that being racist is the problem here or is it just finding new distractions such as intersectional infighting like ageism for hairs to split now?

[–] bearboiblake@pawb.social 1 points 1 hour ago

I don't really understand what you mean, intersectionality is about caring about multiple societal issues, such as ageism, racism and class consciousness.

It's not about infighting, it's about uniting the whole working class. The ruling class preys upon our in-group biases to divide us. Intersectionality is how we resist that attempt to divide us.

[–] joyjoy@lemmy.zip 1 points 10 hours ago

My new political alignment chart compares racism with caring about being seen as racist.

[–] sturmblast@lemmy.world 1 points 12 hours ago
[–] zeppo@lemmy.world -1 points 7 hours ago

We give a fuck how old racist shitbag republicans are?