this post was submitted on 17 Nov 2025
195 points (100.0% liked)

News

33209 readers
2661 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

WASHINGTON (AP) — President Donald Trump said House Republicans should vote to release the files in the Jeffrey Epstein case, a startling reversal after previously fighting the proposal as a growing number of those in his own party supported it. 

“We have nothing to hide, and it’s time to move on from this Democrat Hoax perpetrated by Radical Left Lunatics in order to deflect from the Great Success of the Republican Party,” Trump wrote on social media late Sunday after landing at Joint Base Andrews following a weekend in Florida.

Trump’s statement followed a fierce fight within the GOP over the files, including an increasingly nasty split with Georgia Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene, who had long been one of his fiercest supporters.

top 38 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] MrSmiley@lemmy.zip 136 points 3 days ago (2 children)

He also ordered the doj to open a new investigation which allows his doj to bar any release of the files related to an “open case.” His followers have to be irredeemably brainwashed to accept this.

[–] GrammarPolice@lemmy.world 29 points 3 days ago

His followers have to be irredeemably brainwashed to accept this.

They are

[–] credo@lemmy.world 22 points 3 days ago (1 children)

which allows his doj to bar any release of the files related to an “open case.”

What is that based on? Law? Doesn’t seem like the DOJ’s policies should be able to override one of the three constitutionally prescribed authorities of our country..

Really it will be the GOP letting it happen.

[–] Mirshe@lemmy.world 12 points 3 days ago

No, the current bill proposed allows the DOJ to redact any information related to victims or an ongoing case.

By opening a huge investigation, it basically means they can redact anything they feel like because "ongoing investigation".

[–] stoy@lemmy.zip 64 points 3 days ago

At this point, I refuse to believe that the original files will be released unedited.

Trump's team has a had unrestricted access to the files for a very long time. The original files probably exists somewhere, they are too valuable for a career politician to not either do a quick ctrl+c ctrl+v or just doing a classic photographing the screen.

[–] leadore@lemmy.world 59 points 3 days ago

Now that he knows the vote is going to go against him, time for plan B. He can't let it appear that Congress would actually defy him so he has to "call for" it to happen so they still appear to be obeying him.

I'd be surprised if his minions in charge of the DOJ haven't already destroyed anything damaging to him as soon as they could get hold of it, but in any case we know they have a plan in place for DOJ to not release anything bad for him.

[–] Mihies@programming.dev 48 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

After thousands of FBI agents redacted all mentions of him?

[–] falseWhite@lemmy.world 42 points 3 days ago

He just needed time for someone to sift through and "disappear" all the incriminating documents. Now the rest can be released.

[–] KindnessIsPunk@lemmy.ca 40 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I have been concerned for a long time that they may try to release doctored documents

[–] Wilco@lemmy.zip 28 points 3 days ago (1 children)
[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 8 points 3 days ago

and they will get Maxwell and Mark Epstein to back them up.

They will focus entirely on Clinton, who frankly needs to go to jail as much as Trump. Give them the honeymoon suite.

[–] nulluser@lemmy.world 33 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

Donald! You can just tell the DOJ to release them. You campaigned on releasing them, so just do it. They don't need to vote on it if you just do it.

[–] gAlienLifeform@lemmy.world 17 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Let's all mentally prepare ourselves for Trump to claim he wishes he could release these documents but his gosh darn DOJ just won't do it because they're using them to investigate Bill Clinton or whoever and he certainly wouldn't ever want to interfere with a federal investigation

[–] FreddiesLantern@leminal.space 4 points 3 days ago

Don’t give em ideas.

[–] BannedVoice@lemmy.zip 30 points 3 days ago (3 children)

It’s not a reversal it’s the next step in the coverup. Now that he knows it will be released with or without his approval he’s betting that if he says at the last moment he wants them released that he will look like the good guy.

But also, to be clear, nobody has ever said that Trump did anything wrong but the fact he is / was so against them being released means that he is protecting somebody. Himself? Clinton, Gates, Musk? Who knows but it doesn’t fucking matter.

Release the files, no matter who’s in them!

[–] ideonek@piefed.social 13 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Hm? I feel like a lot of people said he did a lot of fucking things wrong.

[–] arcterus@piefed.blahaj.zone 11 points 3 days ago

Pretty sure it was assumed he might be in them, but it only became extremely obvious that something potentially damning was in them when he started fighting it so hard despite saying he'd release them before getting elected.

But if you mean in general, then yeah, for sure lol.

[–] unconsequential@slrpnk.net 3 points 3 days ago

He’s protecting the trove of blackmail itself. It’s not about a specific who that’s in it— blackmail material loses its value once it’s released and that is decades and dozens of powerful people who will suddenly be useless. Epstein and Maxwell weren’t making their money from trafficking. They were making their money from collecting and selling all manner of secrets.

[–] melsaskca@lemmy.ca 1 points 3 days ago

There is no absolute proof...yet. Until then we can best use the "If it walks like a duck" offensive.

[–] EtAl@lemmy.dbzer0.com 24 points 3 days ago (1 children)

This is called "getting ahead of the story." The only problem is this story is a speeding freight train, and it's going to turn everyone in its path into a pink mist.

[–] SoleInvictus@lemmy.blahaj.zone 13 points 3 days ago

We can only hope!

[–] stickly@lemmy.world 20 points 3 days ago (1 children)

He just got a text that they finished replacing references to his name with Clinton, no need to delay anymore

[–] DaddleDew@lemmy.world 20 points 3 days ago

"We'd love to. But only the bits of it we want to show you"

[–] Gork@sopuli.xyz 19 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Isn't it, you know a conflict of interest for him to have the ability to veto it if it passes the House and Senate, considering he's involved in all this?

[–] FaceDeer@fedia.io 18 points 3 days ago (1 children)

In theory, they can pass this with a veto-proof majority.

In practice, you may have spotted a flaw in the US Constitution here. I'll add it to the pile.

[–] Rhaedas@fedia.io 18 points 3 days ago (2 children)

The Founders: "Look, you guys were supposed to keep improving on it more than you did."

[–] njm1314@lemmy.world 12 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Also the Founders: " Oh God is that a woman voting? Is that a black person who has rights? What are those filthy Irish people are doing everywhere? This government was only supposed to be for wealthy white landowning Anglo-Saxon Protestants."

[–] Airowird@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 3 days ago

Boston Tea Party: This isn't what we meant with "spill the tea" !

[–] Rhaedas@fedia.io 1 points 3 days ago

Except they knew times would change, and so would those things in the public eye, so the document they wrote had to be malleable as well. If you think about it, while a lot of society has improved in respect to those topics, there's still people who think that way, and we haven't come as far as we should have in this time. So let's not get too high and mighty because again, we could have been a lot further along by now.

Keep in mind that future us will be doing the same thing, looking back at what we're doing or not doing and wondering, wtf was their problem?

[–] lando55@lemmy.zip 3 points 3 days ago

"We got the things about guns in there, what else do we need?"

[–] mcv@lemmy.zip 13 points 3 days ago

If it's going to happen anyway, they might as well claim political credit for the thing they used to oppose, right?

[–] gustofwind@lemmy.world 12 points 3 days ago

They control the department of justice, both houses of congress, and the supreme court

Don’t get your hopes up

[–] zd9@lemmy.world 10 points 3 days ago

Man this "hoax" sure has a lot of material

[–] myfunnyaccountname@lemmy.zip 9 points 3 days ago

They will play the democrat card.

[–] JeeBaiChow@lemmy.world 9 points 3 days ago

DOJ: 'Nope, still investigating the Dem names in there.... Dunno how much longer this will take... Wish we could help you...'

[–] PumpkinSkink@lemmy.world 7 points 3 days ago

I can't decide if Trump thinks this will make him look like less of a lame duck when the vote passes the house, or if Trump is trying to reverse psychology them out of it.

[–] HurlingDurling@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

Ok... You heard him! Release them!