this post was submitted on 09 Nov 2025
148 points (97.4% liked)

News

33186 readers
2702 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Joeffect@lemmy.world 101 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (4 children)

What's high income 30k a year or more? Such a joke...

The $2,000 dividend could come in lots of forms, in lots of ways, George," Bessent told anchor George Stephanopoulos. "You know, it could be just the tax decreases that we are seeing on the president's agenda -- you know, no tax on tips, no tax on overtime, no tax on Social Security, deductibility of auto loans."

Oh so no money for you

[–] Gerudo@lemmy.zip 29 points 1 week ago (2 children)

So what this means is there will be no $2000 check. It will just be "hidden" relief that is almost impossible to actually see and verify. Cool cool cool

[–] Joeffect@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago

That's what I get out of it... something they can say they did... but its actually nothing...

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] wizzor@sopuli.xyz 17 points 1 week ago

These are all measures which reinforce some negative aspects of US economy, apart from social security taxes.

[–] socsa@piefed.social 12 points 1 week ago

Great, so the four people who can itemize tips will benefit.

[–] RagingRobot@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago

They want to let us deduct our auto loans? I haven't heard that one yet. My car payment is crazy high though lol

[–] Zaktor@sopuli.xyz 84 points 1 week ago (4 children)

I'll add that to my $5,000 DOGE dividend. Why do news outlets report what he says when he's obviously lying?

[–] Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world 25 points 1 week ago (3 children)

I’ll bet money that he’s going to actually try to do this.

Remember when Congress voted to send Americans assistance checks during the pandemic — and Trump plastered his name all over those checks for shameless political points?

This guy 100% wants to send out “Trump” checks again.

[–] khepri@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

Yeah, I think he both really wants to do it, and at the same time is absolutely lying about having done any actual work or planning to make it happen. Trump love nothing more than to just hang stuff out there, knowing full well he'll capture the news cycle whether or not anything actually has a chance of happening here. But literally the entire country is now governed based on a large group of cronies and enablers trying to interpret his stray demented thoughts, so I'm not sure what we expected.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] ExtremeDullard@piefed.social 61 points 1 week ago (6 children)

Trump steals people's money, then gives some back to them, and that's supposed to pacify them?
How about not stealing people's money to begin with?

[–] Ghyste@sh.itjust.works 35 points 1 week ago (1 children)

and that's supposed to pacify them?

Every single MAGAt will instantly forget any complaints the second they have a check in hand.

[–] PattyMcB@lemmy.world 21 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It doesn't actually sound like anyone will get a check "lots of ways" probably means it's never going to happen, but all the MAGAs will point to him just saying this and gushing about how generous he is

[–] jonne@infosec.pub 9 points 1 week ago (3 children)

That's weird, because the COVID checks were insanely popular and just giving everyone a $2000 check with his name on it would be great politics. I guess it's good they're doing it differently.

[–] PattyMcB@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago

Bread and circuses

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] the_q@lemmy.zip 10 points 1 week ago

Because he only has to be smarter than the dumbest people.

[–] ZephyrXero@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

Hello, let me introduce you to capitalism

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] logicbomb@lemmy.world 49 points 1 week ago (2 children)

$2000 a person won't even offset the additional cost from the ACA subsidy reduction. So, a one-time check that would only cover several months of the recurring cost that he's given us.

[–] henfredemars@infosec.pub 25 points 1 week ago (2 children)

When you’re that rich, $2000 and $0 are basically the same. It’s a pittance for what they see as an underclass of poors.

[–] Drusas@fedia.io 14 points 1 week ago

I think a lot of people don't get this.

Imagine there's something that you want--maybe a lot, maybe only a little. What that something is doesn't matter.

What amount of money would you consider to be a negligible amount for you to spend to get that thing you want? Maybe it's a few dollars or maybe it's as little as 10 cents. For me, now that I am reasonably comfortable, anything that only costs about a dollar, I consider to basically be free.

This is how the wealthy view anything that is "only" in the thousands of dollars.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world 13 points 1 week ago

It also won't make up for the small businesses that went under because their margins disappeared.

[–] Tempus_Fugit@midwest.social 42 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Lol, bet he's only saying this so when the Supreme Court comes down on his illegal tariffs he can say he was going to give us that money.

[–] Archangel1313@lemmy.ca 24 points 1 week ago

Technically, If the Supreme Court rules that his tariffs were illegal to begin with, he will be expected to reimburse everyone affected. That may be all this is. He's just trying to spin it as spontaneous generosity, rather than a court ordered obligation.

[–] henfredemars@infosec.pub 7 points 1 week ago

I was just about to, but you interrupted me!

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] BradleyUffner@lemmy.world 36 points 1 week ago (1 children)

How about you use that money to pay SNAP instead?

[–] ninj4geek@lemmy.wtf 11 points 1 week ago

Because he can say this and it won't happen.

[–] WanderWisley@lemmy.world 27 points 1 week ago

Not happening

[–] splount@lemmy.world 23 points 1 week ago (1 children)

In two weeks. Very special. Don't want to say much now but it's gonna be really special.

[–] Donjuanme@lemmy.world 16 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The Trump 2 week chicken taco timeline.

He started with "solving crime in Chicago in 1 day"

Then they had a Medicare plan just a week away, but he learned that that was too close for the right wing spin machine.

[–] N0t_5ure@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago

To be fair, he has followed through on his promise to be a "dictator on day 1".

[–] DickFiasco@sh.itjust.works 23 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Just ballparking that there are 250 million non-high-earners, at $2k a pop that's $500 billion. Two thousand dollars won't change anyone's life, but $500bn is a big chunk of the federal budget.

[–] shiroininja@lemmy.world 23 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] DickFiasco@sh.itjust.works 23 points 1 week ago

Sorry, I didn't mean to trivialize that amount of money.

[–] Bronzebeard@lemmy.zip 21 points 1 week ago

He says a lot of things. Meanwhile he's gone out of his way repeatedly to try to starve millions of people.

[–] FartMaster69@lemmy.dbzer0.com 21 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Is this dividend in the room with us right now?

[–] MajorasTerribleFate@lemmy.zip 17 points 1 week ago

He has concepts of a dividend.

[–] ThePowerOfGeek@lemmy.world 19 points 1 week ago

The ultra wealthy already got their 'tariff dividend', in the form of not tax breaks and a discrete heads-up of when to play the market to real maybe amounts of extra wealth.

As for the rest, this offer is just more bullshit. If it does surface (which is very unlikely) there will be some strings attached. And it will in no way fully compensate most people for the turmoil caused by these tariffs.

[–] myfunnyaccountname@lemmy.zip 16 points 1 week ago

So this is where snap money has gone too

[–] BotsRuinedEverything@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago (1 children)

So a $2k decrease in taxes using some kind of unspecified math, while cost of living increases by triple that number.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] khepri@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

How about "There is Zero Evidence of $2000 Trump Checks Beyond Mere Words" as the headline ABC? Christ. Or "Trump Floats Idea of $2000 Checks, Or Maybe It's a Tax Rebate, Or Maybe Nothing, Or Maybe He Just Says Shit and We Eat It Up Every Time. Who Cares? Just Stay Scared and Don't Change That Dial!"

[–] Catoblepas@piefed.blahaj.zone 10 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I’ll take it the way I took his stupid ass signed pandemic check. It’s not gonna make me hate the fucker any less, and I’m not stupid enough to think the amount of money the average person has lost on these fucking tariffs is less than $2000. So yeah, pay me to keep the same opinion of you and your policies, shithead.

[–] socsa@piefed.social 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I donated mine 50/50 to Planned Parenthood and SPLC. I don't want his blood money.

[–] Catoblepas@piefed.blahaj.zone 9 points 1 week ago

I’m glad that’s a financial option for you

[–] LadyMeow@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 1 week ago

Lolz, for them it’s $5,000.

Where exactly does that money come from? We end up paying more for it in the end due to inflation and it all trickles up as we spend it.

We need to raise taxes on the ruling class. There is no other way.

[–] Maeve@kbin.earth 8 points 1 week ago (2 children)

"The $2,000 dividend could come in lots of forms, in lots of ways, George," Bessent told anchor George Stephanopoulos. "You know, it could be just the tax decreases that we are seeing on the president's agenda -- you know, no tax on tips, no tax on overtime, no tax on Social Security, deductibility of auto loans."

🚨scam alert🚨

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] foodandart@lemmy.zip 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Oh look.. Little ManBaby is trying to buy friends.

[–] bus_factor@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

It'll probably work, too, if he does it a month before midterms.

[–] crystalmerchant@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

This orange fuck with his grossly transparent attempts to bribe the poors

The sad part is it'll probably work.

load more comments
view more: next ›