this post was submitted on 01 Apr 2025
373 points (98.4% liked)

politics

22605 readers
4255 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Cory Booker at the moment filibustering at the senate as a protest against the whole trump administration . He is speaking for as long as he is physically able too, as stated by him in the CSPAN clip, https://www.c-span.org/clip/us-senate/sen-cory-booker-d-nj-starts-speaking-in-senate-for-as-long-as-i-am-physically-able/5158775

Here is an article that states why he is on the senate floor if you need clarification https://www.cnn.com/2025/03/31/politics/booker-senate-floor-speech-trump-protest/index.html

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Botzo@lemmy.world 73 points 2 days ago (14 children)

From the CNN article:

The speech is not a filibuster because Booker is not blocking legislation or a nomination. The Democratic senator’s speech will keep the Senate floor open – and floor staff working as well US Capitol police members detailed to the chamber – for as long as he continues speaking, but lawmakers had concluded voting on Monday before he began his remarks.

So purely performative. Not a filibuster.

I mean if it's a first step and others follow, then good. But why not filibuster a nomination you disapprove? (I have no clue if filibuster applies to a cloture vote. These fucking stooges and their silly made up rules of decorum...)

[–] jonne@infosec.pub 30 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Yeah, you don't even need to do the actual talking to do a filibuster, you just essentially need to say you're filibustering. However, there's carveouts for the filibuster for nominations and budget reconciliation (and a bunch of other stuff, conveniently all stuff Republicans like).

[–] Botzo@lemmy.world 10 points 2 days ago

Yeah, reading about the cloture rules now. Seems like the motion for cloture happened a couple days ago (temporarily ending debate) and it "ripened" today prompting a cloture vote, itself not apparently subject to filibuster. But simple majority is all that's needed on most nominations, and filibuster is limited to 2 hours before the final vote.

Even that will be performative.

[–] MegaUltraChicken@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

So what happens if the Senate wants to schedule a vote right now? He's not preventing a specific bill, but they can't really do anything until he gives up the floor. It's not nothing.

[–] Botzo@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Yeah, the Senate doesn't seem to publish plans in advance, so it's not really possible to do more than wonder.

I've had the livestream running since I got up today and it's good to hear the words from the senators "asking questions".

And there's a whopping 11,437 people watching it on YouTube, so I'll be one of almost no one that hears more than a few sound bytes.

[–] criss_cross@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago (2 children)

FWIW I think the counts are spread out by channels.

Coey's channel has 68K viewers. AP CNN and others I'm sure have other viewers

[–] Botzo@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yeah, I see that now. Just us nerds over here watching PBS.

[–] KnightontheSun@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

I've been watching on C-SPAN. Senate.gov I think has a live stream too?

[–] MegaUltraChicken@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

AP sitting at 79k right now.

load more comments (1 replies)

So purely performative. Not a filibuster.

i mean yeah, it's a speech.

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] xyzzy@lemm.ee 47 points 2 days ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

Watch it live here.

He was just reading letter after letter after letter from American seniors who are scared about what the administration might do to Social Security. Really helps bring home that these are real people who are affected.

Edit: 15 hours now and he's still going strong. He just gave a fiery speech about how his colleagues need to do more.

Edit: 25 hours. He beat the record. At least it won't be held by a racist anymore.

[–] peoplebeproblems@midwest.social 16 points 2 days ago

4 and a half hours now. Might be symbolic, but there are a lot of angry GOP senators who probably have to stay there.

[–] criss_cross@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

18.5 hours. I hope he breaks the record.

[–] TinMod@lemmy.world 35 points 2 days ago

Wait, Cory Booker has some pepper?

That’s Great!

[–] igg@lemmy.world 29 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Still going on after 13 hours

[–] Lutra@lemmy.world 20 points 1 day ago

17 Hours now. And story after story of American's being hurt, Americans asking their lawmakers to help.

[–] Darkassassin07@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 day ago

23hr and counting.

[–] rice@lemmy.org 28 points 2 days ago

good job, just keep it up for 3.7 years

Hell yuh. I have had misgivings about Booker at times in the past but I have to say, good on him, this is the time for such things.

[–] Initiateofthevoid@lemmy.dbzer0.com 15 points 19 hours ago (7 children)

A man stood and spoke for over 24 hours straight and so many are dismissing it as nothing more than "performative"

This is what it looks like to fight. It's not perfect, it's not easy, it's not even clear if it will do anything. But it's something. It's someone standing up and forcing people to listen to the voices of the unheard.

That's what it looks like to fight. It's an ideological war for the soul and future of the nation - did you really think it would be simple, or easy? That we would have natural heroes and great victories?

Fight in whatever way you can. Yell from whatever rooftop you can find, including the senate floor. Kick and scream, even if it feels pointless. But don't stand around doing nothing but questioning the contributions of others. We need solidarity.

public speaking is literally the single most important thing in politics, look at the recent wyoming vote over trans issues.

Two really talented public speakers made actual headway and progress on the issue.

Unfortunately lefties on the internet suffer from brain damage and will never accept anything other than lenin coming back from the dead to rule america, or whatever.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] astrsk@fedia.io 14 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] Lutra@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago
[–] frazw@lemmy.world 13 points 2 days ago (4 children)

I'm not trying to be a nay-sayer, but what does this actually achieve?

He's not disrupting a vote. He's only talking. While I'm all for the Democrats doing something this doesn't actually achieve much. Chick Schumer had a chance to actually disrupt this administration but he didn't.

So I am genuinely asking, if the Democrats are not preventing the Trump administration from pushing bills through e.g if this were a fillibuster,, how does this help?

[–] safetyincartoons@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago

Hopefully messing with the apathy in the US. The mainstream media is talking about it. And even though it isn’t a filibuster. Strom Thurmond filibustered bs rhetoric against civil rights in the 50’s for a little over 24 hours and people are talking about that so he is kind of making some history. Am basically hoping he is causing more momentum. The system needs fucking changing but we need to come together for that to happen.

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago (5 children)

It makes it look like democrats are willing to use the filibuster, while not actually blocking anything that might upset their donors.

[–] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

Only if the Republicans in Congress weren’t too chickenshit to actually put their names on these actions. Trump is doing everything by executive order.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Gates9@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 day ago

This helps by distracting from the fact that Chuck Schumer didn’t do shit

load more comments (1 replies)

Just a couple more minutes to beat Storm Thurmond's record!

[–] leadore@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago

Thank you, Senator Booker!

[–] Deceptichum@quokk.au 6 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Does the Trump administration need the senate? Seems they’re doing whatever they want regardless of any checks or balances, so who is this actually disrupting?

[–] xyzzy@lemm.ee 23 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Get outta here with that negativity. It's the first sign of life from Senate Democrats, and taking a moral stance against Trump is still important. We need more of this, not less.

[–] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

They’re doing plenty more than this, but they’re not self-promoting enough for people to notice. Democrats voted and spoke out against Trump’s cabinet nominations, forced a 15-day vote against Trump’s executive order, confirmed Biden’s pending judicial appointments when Republican attendance is low, and are the ones bringing these cases to the courts.

[–] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

This is to obstruct fast-tracked appointments by Trump according to C-SPAN. Other than that, you’re right.

The Democrats forced a 15-day vote against Trump’s emergency executive order, and Republicans redefined the entire congressional calendar as a single day, just to avoid holding the vote.

Every last Republican in Congress is complicit.

[–] YiddishMcSquidish@lemmy.today 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] KnightontheSun@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

He's still there as of ~~10am PT~~ 2pm PT.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] adespoton@lemmy.ca 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Booker, not Brooks? Autocorrect?

[–] outrageousmatter@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago

Thanks, I did not notice that mistake.

[–] AlecSadler@sh.itjust.works 5 points 2 days ago
[–] cm0002@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

Oh hey look, someone actually doing something lol

load more comments
view more: next ›