this post was submitted on 08 Nov 2025
92 points (92.6% liked)

No Stupid Questions

44251 readers
590 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here. This includes using AI responses and summaries.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

With a looming iron-grip marketers and advertisers have over pretty much anything in their reach, why aren't the masses collectively making harassment campaigns to them?

I think if we actively told every single marketer off in a prolonged effort, they'd get a hint as to how much of their commercialism we don't need shoved down our throats.

all 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] otacon239@lemmy.world 68 points 21 hours ago (5 children)
  1. I’m not that type of person. I don’t have it in me to rip someone apart that I don’t know personally.
  2. They aren’t personally responsible. They’re on the bottom just like us.
  3. The people who make the money will just continuously recycle employees because they know they can.
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] gravitywell@sh.itjust.works 45 points 20 hours ago (3 children)

Let me tell you about my friend adnauseam

Even better then just harassment, it actively wastes advertiser money by messing with their click-through stats. The more people that run it the less valuable advertising online in general becomes.

Also i would say to a leaser degree Adblocking in general is why people arent more active about fighting back, since they work its enough for most folks to just avoid the problem rather then confront it head on.

[–] fonix232@fedia.io 13 points 20 hours ago (2 children)

This only works when the site, ad network and advertiser are three distinct and separate entities.

Given that pretty much all social media now runs its own advertising systems, it won't actually have much effect. Sure it wastes some money, but given how precise site analytics are, most can actually discern between real clicks and these automated tools.

Not to mention that the whole website for this tool looks like is itself riddled with ads, and also, over 2/3 of all internet traffic happens on mobile devices, which this extension doesn't support.

[–] gravitywell@sh.itjust.works 12 points 20 hours ago

Fair point, if the majority of your browisng is social media or phone apps i dont think you are the target audicence for this.

I know google hates it because even before the manifest v3 stuff it was banned by them, its probably a not insignificant part of WHY they forced the move to manifest v3.

With how anyltics work, just like with adblocking in general its a constant cat and mouse game, and that in itself also costs the advertisers money in having to keep up with the anti-advertising methods.

[–] WhyIHateTheInternet@lemmy.world 5 points 17 hours ago

I was going to mention how 80% of that site just looks like ads

[–] vladmech@lemmy.world 10 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Wait so not only will I not see all this junk due to uBlock Origin but the sites I frequent will make a bit more revenue because it’s registering clicks on all their ads???

[–] Truscape@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago) (1 children)

If the site has pay-per-click ads, yes.

[–] vladmech@lemmy.world 6 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

That’s legit, tossing it on my computers, thanks!

[–] Truscape@lemmy.blahaj.zone 15 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago) (2 children)

Word of warning - you will have more bandwidth usage since the ad clicks are being loaded in the background sandbox, so be careful if you have something like a capped data plan for things such as smartphones.

[–] vladmech@lemmy.world 3 points 18 hours ago

Oh good to know, thank you!

[–] GreyCat@lemmy.world 1 points 5 hours ago

Do people still have those these days ?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Know_not_Scotty_does@lemmy.world 25 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Good question, I got an ad on my fucking banana the other day...

collapsed inline media

[–] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 10 points 20 hours ago

It's one banana! How much could it possibly cost? $10?

[–] crozilla@lemmy.world 19 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Everything flows down from the C-Suite. They tell Marketing to increase sales. Marketing tells Advertising to make “creative” ads (but then only approves “safe” boring ads). Then Marketing runs those uninteresting ads based on the number of times a spreadsheet says will get the most sales. They are disassociated from the customer experience, and will likely not be moved by public outcry. They only care when it doesn’t work, and it does or they wouldn’t do it. Sorry.

[–] danciestlobster@lemmy.zip 3 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

While I mostly agree, for many kinds of ads there isn't a great way to correlate particular ads with efficacy, so there absolutely are as campaigns that the c suite is convinced are working that are just practically not at all.

[–] False@lemmy.world 3 points 15 hours ago

I'd imagine there are ways to control for that, to some extent. Ie you run an ad in market A but not in market B to see if it works. Wouldn't with for all contexts though.

[–] Perspectivist@feddit.uk 16 points 11 hours ago (5 children)

Because I try my best to treat other people the way I wish to be treated myself. I have no desire to harass anyone, and if I did, I’d feel awful about it. There are enough jerks in the world already, and I don’t want to add to that. Nobody has ever stopped acting shitty because people responded by acting shitty toward them. What you’re advocating isn’t virtuous, no matter what story you tell yourself about it. You’re just trying to justify your own bad behavior so you don’t have to feel guilty when you go to bed at night.

[–] khannie@lemmy.world 5 points 10 hours ago
[–] jerkface@lemmy.ca 4 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

Nobody has ever stopped acting shitty because people responded by acting shitty toward them.

Absolutely not true, and also contrary to the entire premise of the justice system.

But while you go too far in some of your arguments, your point is sound.

[–] thatonecoder@lemmy.ca 1 points 5 hours ago

It is more about treating people with the respect that you wish to be treated with.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] j4k3@lemmy.world 15 points 20 hours ago (3 children)

Back before I blocked every type of ad, I would click through ads every time they pissed me off. I would click, let the page load, and click two more links within their page before closing it. Ad views cost them a small fraction of a cent. That click through cost them an order of magnitude more money. That is how AdSense works. All you have to do is get everyone to do the same and the entire system fails within a few weeks. No one cares if you whine to some low level employees. If you want to protest, molest their bank account like they do your time. They are actually extremely vulnerable if you simply understand how the system works.

[–] gravitywell@sh.itjust.works 9 points 20 hours ago

Did you know there is a browser extension that does this for you while also blocking ads from view?

[–] fonix232@fedia.io 9 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

It's actually a bit more complicated.

AdSense indeed used to work through ratios of views and clicks, but Google (and all other ad networks) have been tinkering with it to benefit them even more.

Today, it's about conversion, and conversion as a KPI is not well defined. Clicking into an as might simply not be enough to make it cost more.

[–] bryndos@fedia.io 2 points 8 hours ago

Yeah. I'd assume they do it at least as a ratio, not an absolute. They can't be that stupid . . . can they?

[–] 667@lemmy.radio 5 points 20 hours ago

I heard there is a browser extension which does this

[–] fonix232@fedia.io 15 points 20 hours ago

It's because people have generally accepted that marketing is a thing, and will be a thing - and that as long as it isn't directly harmful, it can actually be beneficial to the consumer.

Which, to be fair, makes some sense. On one hand you have people who want a service, on the other you have the service that wants to make money. But running that service costs more than people are willing to pay so you bring in a third party who gets to advertise to the people while giving money to the service for this, subsidising costs and making a cheap service possible. It's a win-win-win situation, isn't it?

Well it would be if it wasn't for this damn end stage capitalist constant hypergrowth requirement. Everything has to make a constantly growing profit. If the profit GROWTH isn't higher than last year, your business is crap. So now everyone is milking every last drop of money from every possible angle, leading to more ads, shittier services, and people moving on. Thanks to the greed of the few, the otherwise good thing, or acceptable status quo, is now crap.

Marketing isn't at fault for this, it's just a symptom.

[–] zbyte64@awful.systems 10 points 20 hours ago

Being right isn't as important as doing right. I have better things to do with my time, unlike marketers.

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 9 points 9 hours ago (11 children)

I'm increasingly of the opinion that the only way to stop the excesses of capitalism is with a concerted effort to gum up the works, one business at a time, from most to least evil.

Everyone who has worked retail knows how to waste the company's time, money, and effort.

Let's say it's a chain of megamarts:

Pick a busy day. Load up a cart with rotisserie chickens, raw meat, and ice cream, and abandon it in the garden center. Window shop and ask as many questions as possible of every employee you encounter. Ask dumb questions. Ask what the battery life on a pair of wired headphones is. Ask how many eggs are in a dozen. How do they know the chicken is boneless? Have they looked? Don't buy anything you ask all the questions about. Buy only loss leaders. Pay with a combination of loose change, a check, and a card you know will decline at the end. "Oh wait I need just one more thing. I'll just be a second!" then leave through the garden center. Go to the automotive center and talk to them about financing a large tire purchase. Back out at the last second. Get paint mixed and then wander off absentmindedly while they're mixing it. Pretend to be interested in signing up for their store credit card. There are so many time wasting questions you can ask about a credit card. And so many ways to fill out a form incorrectly so it's useless. Try to pay with any coupon but one that you know will work. Expired coupons. Coupons for other stores. Coupons from defunct stores. Coupons from Arby's. Chuck E Cheese tokens. Gift certificates from that one comic book shop across town that's run by a sweet old man that still uses gift certificates because he's old fashioned that way. Traveler's cheques. Ask if your membership card from their direct competitor entitles you to any discounts. If you speak a language other than English, that is now your only language. You understand English only when it is disadvantageous to the company for you to do so.

Time is money. Waste their money. And since this is being done to one business at a time, their competitors don't have an entire movement of people acting like plausibly deniable problem customers dragging them down. You're distorting the margin at which they can operate. If they raise prices while it takes forever to buy anything in the stores, well, none of their competitors have that problem.

Yet.

Leave glowing reviews of every low-level employee you encounter. Tip them. Make up a few employees and give them glowing reviews. Leave scathing reviews of anyone in management you encounter.

[–] lepinkainen@lemmy.world 9 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Rather just figure out where the board and C-staff lives and take a shit on their porch

Every day

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 5 points 6 hours ago

You can do both.

[–] jerkface@lemmy.ca 6 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

Please don't contribute to the abuse, torture, and murder of vulnerable individuals just to make a totally unrelated point. Chickens and cattle are not lumber and steel, they are individuals who would have been loved by their mothers if they had been given the opportunity. The animals we create are all morally entitled to the exact same unconditional love and protection as our own children.

[–] WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works 4 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

it sounds fun but

And since this is being done to one business at a time,

how can people coordinate that?

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 5 points 7 hours ago

Pick a chain. One that's everywhere. Then pick a day to start and a condition for ceasing. Then get the word out.

The thing is to be indistinguishable from a run of the mill garbage customer, so if they crack down on people for acting like that, they'll piss off the boomers who genuinely act like that as a matter of course.

[–] Aqarius@lemmy.world 2 points 7 hours ago

This reads like a George Carlin bit

[–] 1984@lemmy.today 2 points 22 minutes ago

Harassing the underpaid workers is your solution?

One thing ive noticed is that the younger generation, which I assume you are, have a lot of desire to change capitalism but absolutely shit poor ideas how to do it.

Im not saying I have any great ideas either. But making the already suffering employees suffer more will not lead to changes. You know that.

[–] thatonecoder@lemmy.ca 1 points 5 hours ago

Oh my. This is so well planned. Props to you.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] sin_free_for_00_days@sopuli.xyz 3 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago)

Time to post the classics Bill Hicks and George Carlin.

[–] etchinghillside@reddthat.com 2 points 20 hours ago

I think you’re fluffing the ego of marketers a little too high.

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 1 points 8 hours ago

They'd probably enjoy it.

[–] Creat@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 9 hours ago

I assume you mean unsolicited phone calls with this? I haven't gotten any of those in about a decade, if not more. And those were isolated cases as well. We have laws against that sort of thing. It's not been a problem for a very very long time (early 2000s or so).

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 1 points 10 hours ago

Create special waiting queue on your home telephone system with the most horrible waiting music loop. Maybe some Texas country music yodel. Marketer calls, feign interest, "oh, there is someone at the door!", put them in the waiting queue, and leave them there until they give up. Repeat until lesson learned by marketer.