FUCK TED CRUZ!
this post was submitted on 01 Oct 2025
618 points (99.5% liked)
politics
26290 readers
2862 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
But not proper fuck
With a tire iron, good enough?
I'm thinking some rough hewn pine is appropriate. Tire irons are usually painted and smooth. There is no point of such luxury here.
Hmmm, chimney sweeping brush?
If the bristles are steel, I am willing to accept your recommendation.
Well, I'm very confident the bristles are metal wire.
I second this motion!!
And use protection!
Party of small dicks
Think of the pedofiles. Clutches pearls
You can't see the hand under his desk squeezing harder and harder.
Instructions unclear, is he supposed to like that?
Non -pedophiles carrying water for pedophiles
Pretty ick.
That's best case
Well of course. If he didn't, it would be anti-capitalism and therefore terrorism.
Terrorcommunisocialism
Senate rules are embarrassing. One corrupt person can block a law that would benefit everyone in the country. The vast majority of US senators are bribed by dozens of wealthy donors.
But one senator van jam up a bill that would hurt too.
Given how weak and sold out the Democrats are, nothing happening is far better than what the Republicans want. That is actually what the Democrats base their entire electoral strategy on, aiming to do aiming to do nothing.
It is extremely undemocratic.
A single senator from a state with less population than a small city (500,000) in California can stop a law that would benefit tens of millions of people. It makes the votes of less populous states disproportionately more powerful than a vote from a large state.
There are only 6 cities in california with >500,000 population... I don't think you can call that a small city. Your point still stands, but let's not get crazy with our words here.
Sure, bit with so many offices captured by nazi allies and nhilistic pieces of shit, less is more right now.
Now is the reason the system was set up like this, specifically so a minority can jam up the majority pushing through a bunch of plutovratic nazi shit.
Forget that, won't someone think of the pedophiles?!
Don't worry citizen. Ted will!
Anyone in Texas know how to etch brass?
Just need a blue sharpie
I like CANCUNT
The only time Texans get a break from Ted Cruz is when there’s a natural disaster.
He's one of those politicians that I just can't understand every time they get re-elected. Like Schumer, or Graham. Voters are just the worst.
Don't forget MTG! Tons of her constituents are immigrants, too! (Indian)
The one that I could never understand was Mitch McConnell.
He was awful, but he did everything the Republicans wanted. Very effective to their cause of over turning Democracy.
Honestly! I was in Texas for the Snowpocalypse and I naively thought everyone had woken up to his sniveling spineless ways.
I genuinely thought "Even if Trump wins, Texas will get Allred."
Then November happened and I was so fucking baffled. Cruz is reportedly abhored by EVERYONE.
Because most people have reduced voting down to cheerleading for 'their' side. Cruz has the (r) by his name, he gets their vote.
When he goes on vacation with his family, Texans had better watch out
So this means he should have no privacy too right? Hahaha oh wait right he's special.
I hate that man, Ted Cruz.
I hate his right wing views.
Instantaneously I get the blues
I think what should happen next is that every aspect of Ted Cruz's life should be made public. When he sits at his table eating his morning cereal there should be cameramen outside livestreaming it for the world to see.
Protect the pedophiles, but not the privacy of the people that you yourself receive.
Was this before or after he said we should stop attacking pedos?
Other than this, i dont understand how so many politicians around the world do not understand the importance of privacy rights? The size and number of data breaches that have been happening lately has been skyrocketing and I am genuinely baffled how anyone can think it is a good idea to force people (like they are in the UK currently) to submit very sensitive IDs like passports or driver's licenses to the governments when... yeah, the UK government had a breach very recently with tons of data leaked...
Laws governing data privacy and corporation collection of information should have been very strictly regulated in the very early 2000s, we are fucking super late in the game.
i dont understand how so many politicians around the world do not understand the importance of privacy rights
They do understand their importance. They understand that they have to suppress those rights to continue in power.
Additionally, they understand that a fundamental lack of privacy is great for security and ultimately, their wallets.
40486 all lawmakers, enforcers and government officials.
Data brokers make a shit ton of money.... No surprise they got to someone to block this
Technofash: Cha Ching!
Ted Cruz looks like someone I wouldn't trust to sell me a used car.
More like red hot metal rod
I hate this so much. Special people get special treatment - everyone else can just get fucked, I guess.
.....