this post was submitted on 15 Sep 2025
127 points (98.5% liked)

politics

25634 readers
2585 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 41 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] MushuChupacabra@lemmy.world 65 points 5 hours ago

Tell me how you voted, and ill tell you how I feel about your plight.

[–] sbbq@lemmy.zip 63 points 5 hours ago (4 children)

The people that hire a ton of immigrants unerringly vote for the guy who promises to remove immigrants. What did you think was going to happen?

[–] onslaught545@lemmy.zip 41 points 5 hours ago (2 children)

They were told that it would just be the criminals and gang members, and they were stupid enough to believe it.

[–] NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip 29 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Some? Maybe

Mostly it is just that their hate and selfishness overrides everything. It is the same reason that pro gun republicans still won overwhelmingly after the massacre in Uvalde and farmers keep voting for republicans no matter how much they get screwed over. Because as long as they can believe someone else is suffering more, they are happy.

[–] onslaught545@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 hour ago

I think you vastly overestimate how informed these people are on anything related to politics. Most of them don't think any further than, "vote red because that's what I was raised to do."

[–] Bronzebeard@lemmy.zip 8 points 4 hours ago

While they simultaneously screamed that every immigrant was a criminal

[–] Tryenjer@lemmy.world 17 points 3 hours ago (2 children)

It looks like their farms will be bought at a discount by the oligarchs.

[–] JHRD1880@lemmy.world 5 points 2 hours ago

Damn, if only there was something in a program, maybe some sort of... project that would have warned them about it.

[–] AndiHutch@lemmy.zip 3 points 30 minutes ago

What a kwinkidink considering this:

JD Vance gets rich by owning an app (acretrader) that helps investors outside of the United States snap up real estate deals (including many family farms and rental properties) that are then owned by people who have never and will never see those places and who ONLY own those places to obtain money and power in our country.

[–] some_designer_dude@lemmy.world 16 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Your question assumes capacity for forethought.

[–] WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world 9 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

And the capability to empathize instead of just raw dogging every experience like it's a brand new thing that nobody could ever imagine or understand.

[–] MagicShel@lemmy.zip 2 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Here's the thing: they aren't asking for a reversal of the policy, they just want a fix to the problem. A solution that the criminal-industrial slave complex can provide...

[–] meco03211@lemmy.world 5 points 3 hours ago

"Arbeit macht frei" will soon adorn the farms that benefit from whatever solution this admin provides.

[–] Feyd@programming.dev 32 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago) (2 children)

What never ceases to amaze me is that people hiring undocumented workers aren't getting in major legal trouble, and that they straight up admit they were doing it publicly.

Assuming the mindset that we need to get rid of the big scary immigrants, how are the people hiring them not equally culpable?

[–] krashmo@lemmy.world 19 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Hey now, logic has no place here. You're also forgetting the foundational principle of our criminal justice system. It's not illegal if you have money and your motivation was greed.

[–] snooggums@piefed.world 3 points 4 hours ago

Also, you can't punish individuals when a whole company does crimes, because you can't hold companies accountable.

Unless the company harms the wealthy, then some scapegoats might suffer some consequences.

[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 6 points 2 hours ago

they were under obama. He deported people but more importantly he fined the employers.

[–] whyrat@lemmy.world 31 points 5 hours ago (2 children)

“The whole thing is screwed up,” said John Painter, a three-time Trump voter who runs an organic dairy farm in Westfield. “We need people to do the jobs Americans are too spoiled to do.”

With an attitude like that it's no wonder you're having trouble finding people to work for you...

“We moved to H-2A out of necessity,” added Sarah Zost, an orchard grower in Gardners, Pennsylvania. “No one wants to use the program. It’s a paperwork nightmare.”

If only one party had been proposing to fix immigration; only to have their efforts hamstrung by insistence we first "strengthen the border". See reference here: https://www.brookings.edu/articles/the-collapse-of-bipartisan-immigration-reform-a-guide-for-the-perplexed/

The best chance to enact comprehensive reform came in 2013 during President Barack Obama’s second term, when a bipartisan group of senators dubbed the “Gang of Eight” agreed on a bill that would toughen security at the southern border and make it harder for employers to hire migrants who had entered the U.S. illegally while providing legal status and a path to citizenship for millions of such migrants who had resided in the U.S. for many years. The proposal passed the Senate 68 to 32 with strong bipartisan support. But because it did not enjoy the support of a majority of House Republicans, then-Speaker John Boehner refused to bring it to floor for a vote, and the measure died.

Article doesn't mention pay either...

[–] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 13 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

But because it did not enjoy the support of a majority of House Republicans, then-Speaker John Boehner refused to bring it to floor for a vote

Ahh yes, the informal rule named for child rapist Dennis Hastert (R) that has only ever been used by republicans.

[–] SGGeorwell@lemmy.world 8 points 4 hours ago

John Boehner is a drunk piece of shit who was constantly crying in public because he was constantly shitfaced at work. Just throwing that out there. I speak from personal experience.

[–] 7112@lemmy.world 28 points 5 hours ago (1 children)
[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 2 points 1 hour ago

It's too bad the punishment for what THEY voted for only applied to them, since they asked for it. It'd be nice if normal Americans could go on living our lives under a normal administration...

[–] mysticpickle@lemmy.ca 16 points 3 hours ago
[–] Catma@lemmy.world 13 points 2 hours ago
[–] calliope@retrolemmy.com 8 points 5 hours ago

The whole thing is screwed up,” said John Painter, a three-time Trump voter who runs an organic dairy farm in Westfield. “We need people to do the jobs Americans are too spoiled to do.”

Huh. Can’t see any problems here. Have the day you keep voting for, buddy!

I feel so bad that some poor “salt of the earth” can’t keep the farms their daddies left them… 🙄

[–] flandish@lemmy.world 6 points 4 hours ago

that “free market capitalism” they think they have/had was worth it huh? pay workers more so you can find them locally, or if you cannot, close your farm. or fight to remove all borders (objectively a good thing) so you don’t have to worry about the made up an ever moving goalposts that is “immigration law.” or fight to remove capitalism and off a few burbs with one stone.

[–] Marshezezz@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

Hire legal workers and pay your proper taxes, asshole. Especially when your money is probably coming from subsidies anyway

[–] CircaV@lemmy.ca 6 points 2 hours ago
[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 5 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Well, goooooollllly. And gee-whillickers.

Now just who the fuck could have done this to us? How could Kamala and her cackle do this to such fine, upright REEL MERIKANS?

“The whole thing is screwed up,” said John Painter, a three-time Trump voter who runs an organic dairy farm in Westfield. “We need people to do the jobs Americans are too spoiled to do.” [emphasis mine]

Well, lookee here. Gosh, I wonder if there is any correlation to voting and outcomes?

Also, is this guy stepping up to do the job, or is he "too spoiled"?

[–] NABDad@lemmy.world 1 points 24 seconds ago

I think you meant:

"Ach, now who in the world went and done this to us, once?"

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 5 points 3 hours ago

Well, yes. Happens when you take the road to stupid.

Have you tried this "bootstraps" thing?

[–] whiwake@lemmy.cafe 4 points 4 hours ago
[–] FreshParsnip@lemmy.ca 3 points 5 hours ago (2 children)

America can't have nice things

[–] JeeBaiChow@lemmy.world 2 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

America had nice things. Once.

[–] FreshParsnip@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 hours ago

Trump took away the corporation for public broadcasting

[–] flandish@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago

*should not be allowed to have nice things.

[–] DarkFuture@lemmy.world 3 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Good.

I hope they lose their jobs and have to struggle to find another living while a corporation buys their land.

[–] notabot@piefed.social 1 points 29 minutes ago

Do you really want a corporation buying their land, or just someone with more sense?

[–] JeeBaiChow@lemmy.world 2 points 3 hours ago

Duh. Just find the Americans willing to work for the same wages. Easy.

Thanks trump!

[–] Fandangalo@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago

This man’s pants are holding on for dear life in the thumbnail. Just floating in the wind.

[–] BlameTheAntifa@lemmy.world 1 points 23 minutes ago

collapsed inline media

Image description: An image of an RSVP style card saying “A FORMAL REMINDER: You Voted For This. YOU ARE GETTING WHAT YOU DESERVE. NOVEMBER, TUESDAY 5, 2024 YOU MADE YOUR CHOICE.”