this post was submitted on 15 Sep 2025
353 points (96.3% liked)

Political Memes

9451 readers
2950 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

No AI generated content.Content posted must not be created by AI with the intent to mimic the style of existing images

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] creamlike504@jlai.lu 140 points 2 days ago (16 children)

On the one hand, I think everyone hates that person who pulls the "I'm an empath" card.

On the other hand, "empathy isn't real" is a bad faith attack on the concept of trying to emphasize or even understand people that are different from you.

That's what I got from every Charlie Kirk debate I ever saw: a machine gun of bad faith counterarguments.

Debate is about understanding where the other person is coming from, identifying weaknesses in each other's position, and working towards shared truths.

Since he couldn't empathize, Charlie couldn't debate. So he went with the modern debate strategy: I only win when someone else is losing.

[–] ShaggySnacks@lemmy.myserv.one 58 points 1 day ago

That’s what I got from every Charlie Kirk debate I ever saw: a machine gun of bad faith counterarguments.

Spoiler alert: That's how fascists argue. It's all bad faith arguments.

[–] Zeppo@sh.itjust.works 51 points 2 days ago

I noted a while ago that I never once heard Kirk say an argument that wasn’t a debate fallacy. Not one time.

[–] null_dot@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 2 days ago (4 children)

What is the "I'm an empath" card?

Are there people who try to make out like they're Deanna Troi style empaths?

Or do you just mean people who claim to have particularly strong empathy / be particularly empathetic?

As an aside, emphasize isn't related to empathy, and I didn't think empathize is a word, although my spell-check apparently thinks it is?

[–] BigPotato@lemmy.world 17 points 2 days ago

As an empath, I'm really in tune with other people's emotions, and I cry all the time, so I know that you're super broken up about not knowing about the empath card - even if you can't stand to admit it to anyone but me, who's more in tune with your emotions than you are... Because I'm an empath.

No shit Susan, getting sad at the commercials for starving children doesn't make you an empath.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (13 replies)
[–] crunchy@lemmy.dbzer0.com 57 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Damn, somehow it's even worse with the full context.

[–] Daft_ish@lemmy.dbzer0.com 25 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

Wait till you see the one about gun deaths and he reduces human life down to a statistic. As america spirals into authoritarianism with no recourse from the 2nd amendment defenders. At least cars do what they purport to do.

collapsed inline media

Everyday I consent to get in my car. I do not consent, to say, getting shot in a public location, like maybe, a university campus.

[–] Zagorath@aussie.zone 20 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Everyday I consent to get in my car. I do not consent, to say, getting shot in a public location

I get that your main point is to debunk this guy's defence of guns, and that's a worthy goal, but this is motornormative bullshit. Cars kill thousands of people who gave no such consent, like pedestrians and cyclists. The analogy doesn't even line up properly. A more apt analogy would be to compare consenting to carrying a gun yourself being equivalent of consenting to get in your car.

And even that implies that you really did give full and uncoerced consent with viable alternative options. Which, if you live in a typical car-dependent American (or Canadian, Australian, etc.) city, you did not. Because your city lacks adequate public transport options, lacks safe cycling infrastructure, and things are too far apart to walk in a reasonable time. !fuckcars@lemmy.world

Guns are also bad and anyone who thinks America doesn't need radical change in gun culture and gun laws is fucking insane. But don't let that fact be a reason to also defend motornormativity.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] crunchy@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 2 days ago

Wow, all those armed guards are really good at hiding because I never see them. I feel much safer now

[–] WatDabney@lemmy.dbzer0.com 57 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Sorry to nitpick, but technically not a psychopath but a sociopath.

A psychopath recognizes that things like empathy and integrity and morality exist, and just doesn't care. A sociopath (like, by his own admission, both Kirk and the linked poster) doesn't even understand what they are or believe that they exist.

Aside from that - yes - it's deliciously ironic that the linked poster apparently sincerely believes that the context somehow makes it better, rather than, as it actually does, simply driving home the point that Kirk was a sociopath.

[–] Daft_ish@lemmy.dbzer0.com 19 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (5 children)

Im not convinced he didnt know empathy existed. I believe he uses these weak cliches as a piffy jumping off point while "debating." Sure, no one can feel the exact same way as someone but thats not what empathy means. I believe Charlie knew that but instead of conceding the point he would use appeals like this to get suggestable people to deny the reality of empathy.

He demonstrates this by admiting he knows the meaning of the word sympathy and how it is different from empathy.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] A_norny_mousse@feddit.org 47 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Christ on a cracker, the context makes it even worse!

[30 comments in this is probably not an original comment anymore, but I had to write it out]

FWIW, I work with children, and I see every day that empathy is a learned skill. Usually learned at the same time they learn socialising with other kids. This person was probably failed by all adults around him in childhood. By the system. But that doesn't excuse going on social media and whipping the masses into a hateful frenzy.

[–] GladiusB@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Isn't Christ THE cracker? Wouldn't Christ on a cracker be two crackers?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] frezik@lemmy.blahaj.zone 46 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

ATTENDEE: Do you know how many transgender Americans have been mass shooters over the last 10 years?

KIRK: Too many. [Applause]

ATTENDEE: In America, it's five. Now, five is a lot, right, I'm going to give you — I'm going to give you some credit. Do you know how many mass shooters there have been in America over the last 10 years?

KIRK: Counting or not counting gang violence?

If this had gone on, the next question should be "does gang violence only count as three-fifths of a violence to you?"

[–] pulsewidth@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

But also - even if you add gang violence to the figures, all it would do is dilute the number of trans shooters further, if taken as a genuine premise, he devastates his own argument.

Of course it's not a genuine question though as he's not attempting to have an honest discussion, he's just trying to throw in a racist whataboutism to distract (and hopefully derail) the initial discussion. Standard right-wing chud 'debate' behaviour.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Tiger666@lemmy.ca 44 points 1 day ago

Empathy is about understanding where someone is coming from. Plain and simple.

Charlie Kirk had no empathy because he had no interest in understanding where people were coming from when he debated with them. He was always on the attack and never tried to understand his opponent.

He was the apogee of the thoughts and prayers kind of people.

Empathy for me and sympathy for thee kind of people.

[–] BlameTheAntifa@lemmy.world 43 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

So the rest of the quote reveals a kind of sociopathic narcissism in which he argues that empathy doesn't exist, so instead you just need to passively look down on others.

The context makes it clear that he does not mean “sympathy” in it’s “i support you” meaning but the “you have my sympathy” - aka “thoughts and prayers” - meaning.

[–] PotatoLibre@feddit.it 38 points 1 day ago

I thought the quote was bad, the full version is almost worse.

We go from "mean" to "mean and stupid".

[–] apftwb@lemmy.world 35 points 1 day ago

What a great concept to teach boys/young adults who are still developing or struggling with emotional intelligence.

The world is better without him.

[–] victorz@lemmy.world 34 points 1 day ago

Tell me you've never looked up these two words before without telling me bruh wtf, they aren't synonyms, they mean different things lmfao rest in dirt.

Not understanding the difference between empathy and sympathy also means they can't understand how empathy is a strength that can be used to your advantage.

Is empathy a strategic imperative? A review essay

Despite its softer connotations, empathy is hard, requiring strategists to confront misperceptions and false assumptions, and overcome individual egos and national hubris. This article reviews the literature, examining some of the gaps and costs incurred. Whilst strategic empathy may have transactional and instrumental connotations, it suggests that the concept holds greater potential to transform strategy. Used wisely, it offers an ethos and means to put people first, foster greater security, and offer innovative approaches to contemporary challenges.

[–] Naich@lemmings.world 31 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Empathy means you realise that you are fundamentally the same as someone else, sympathy comes from a position of power. It's a performance where you are pretending that you are feeling something so you don't appear as a psychopath.

[–] Daft_ish@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (6 children)

Its not a performance.... its a neurological function of your brain.

[–] Naich@lemmings.world 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

If you don't have empathy, I don't see how it's possible to have genuine sympathy.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] GladiusB@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I think sympathy can be something you can try and understand but not fully grasp. I can TRY and understand why women are emotional during menstruation, but will I ever KNOW what that feels like? No I won't.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Hermit_Lailoken@lemmy.world 29 points 1 day ago (3 children)

I am starting to think that this guy was an asshole.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] DarkFuture@lemmy.world 27 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Charlie Kuck dropped out of college after 1 semester and it shows.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] kryptonianCodeMonkey@lemmy.world 27 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Sympathy means you are practicing concern for others from your own perspective. Usually that means relating to someone through your own similar experiences. For example, when someone loses their job, your remember how you felt when you lost your job or when you felt inadequate or betrayed, or when you faced financial struggles. And you sympathize with them through those shared circumstances. This is a great thing, and you should absolutely do this.

Empathy means you take someone's perspective to try to understand how they feel. This is of course, impossible to do perfectly as you are not them. But the point of it to step outside of your own lens and your low personal experiences and get a glimpse of how they feel from their own experiences. This is of particular value when you do not have a comparable experience for what they are going through to pull from. Like a white person in America has never had the experience of being racial profiled by the police. Any attempt to sympathize would be ignorant at best, insulting at worst. Your experience getting pulled over for speeding is not the same as being pulled over for seeming suspicious for having your skin color in a given place and time. Practicing empathy is trying to understand what that must feel like for them from their perspective and given all of the experiences they must have had in their life. Again, this is going to be imperfect, but if services a purpose in making you understand the experiences and world views of others that are different than you.

That is why the right hatesthe concept of empathy. A) It means that their experience and viewpoint is not objective. B) It means that they are expected to practice seeing others as individuals in whole, not as charactictures and stereotypes. C) It means that they are faced with the realities of bias, bigotry, privilege, and systemic racism that does exist and is experienced by everyone differently. And D) It means that their gut reactions, their inherent feelings of fear, disgust, anger, and hatred at those different to themselves needs to be challenged and seen for the bigotry it is.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] scarabic@lemmy.world 27 points 1 day ago (1 children)

This is the kind of simplistic 1-2-3 logic they use all the time to destroy entire concepts like… human empathy. Troglodytes around the world will walk around with this phrase in their back pockets for years. Thanks, dead guy.

[–] DarkFuture@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago

At least he's dead. At least we have that.

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 26 points 1 day ago

The full context makes it even worse.

Empathy isn’t just about feeling, it’s about perspective. Not only do you attempt to understand the feeling, you try to understand the situation the person is in that led to those feelings. Sympathy is acknowledging something bad happened to someone, but that doesn’t mean you personally appreciate the emotions of the other person.

[–] betterdeadthanreddit@lemmy.world 22 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I guarantee he isn't feeling anything now.

[–] Zier@fedia.io 8 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] Nougat@fedia.io 7 points 1 day ago

Pretty sure he felt a split second of surprise.

[–] ArmchairAce1944@discuss.online 20 points 1 day ago* (last edited 18 hours ago) (2 children)

So he had neither empathy nor sympathy...

load more comments (2 replies)

As he said, Empathy requires, well...Empathy. the ability to recognize what a person MIGHT be feeling. It's reading someone, and trying to relate. It doesn't mean literally reading their mind, and channeling their emotions like a Vulcan Mind Meld.

On the other hand, Sympathy can simply mean pity, especially to someone like him. He can't recognize your pain, all he can do is feel superior that he's not in pain.

It's the basic definition of Liberal vs Republican. Liberals (general term, not Neo Liberals) are concerned with society, Republicans are concerned with themselves.

[–] Zozano@aussie.zone 15 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (10 children)

This is something similar to what Sam Harris said.

Sam Harris advocates that empathy is the wrong metric by which to evaluate helping someone, and we should use compassion instead.

The difference? Empathy can be highjacked and relies on intuition. You see a news story about some little girl in your city who lost her arm in a dog attack, you feel more for empathy for her than a child in Africa whose whole family was just slaughtered by militant Christians.

So, instead, we should use compassion as our north-star. We can use logic to guide us to making choices which lead to preferable outcomes for those who need it most.

None of this relates to Kirk though because he's a pseudointellectual grifter who failed to demonstrate empathy for anyone who doesn't fit into his Christian nationalist world view. That's my two cents.

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] CaptPretentious@lemmy.world 14 points 1 day ago

So according to https://www.etymonline.com/word/empathy the word was coined in 1858 in German. And was coined in English in 1908. So "new age" is 117 years (or less, whenever this was actually said).

Then, he seems to imply these things (empathy and sympathy) are mutually exclusive... which they are not.

And the whole point, is to appear intellectual and deep with "and no one can feel what another person feels"... If this was Reddit, this would be pinned, front page of /r/im14andthisisdeep for all time.

And much like many plots in GoT that went no where... the "lot of damage" is brought up but it didn't go anywhere. How does it cause damage? What does it damage? What IS the damage? I'll do you one better, WHO is the damage!

[–] canajac@lemmy.ca 12 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

I didn't know crap about this guy a week ago. I have 2 sons who sort of like this guy but can't really tell me why. They get pissed off when I ask about him although I'm not putting him down, since I knew nothing about him. Now though, after reading at least 10 articles from left/right/middle/ websites and can positively say that the one shot that killed him was a great fucking shot. No one should die for what they're saying... but then Hitler said many things too but was not killed.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] olafurp@lemmy.world 11 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago)

New age, huh?

1908, modeled on German Einfühlung (from ein "in" + Fühlung "feeling"), which was coined 1858 by German philosopher Rudolf Lotze (1817-1881) as a translation of Greek empatheia "passion, state of emotion,"

I looked up empatheia and it turns out to mean maliciousness and having an opposite meaning

[–] josefo@leminal.space 11 points 1 day ago

Now that you mention, I don't really feel a bullet in my neck. Cool.

[–] 0ndead@infosec.pub 10 points 2 days ago

This is where I get to say “Fuck your feelings”

[–] prettybunnys@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 day ago

Ok. Hear me out.

We lock the doors of cpac after lacing the water with mdma.

Afterwards we let them out. Those that survived will know empathy, the rest … well good riddance I suppose.

load more comments
view more: next ›