TIL: Nobody is perfect
Technology
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related news or articles.
- Be excellent to each other!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
- Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.
Approved Bots
glares in the general direction of the White House
...did you think there were perfect people in the White House before this? Or at any point in your life? Haha
(Maybe as a child would that make sense...)
Teddy Roosevelt was pretty chill. He's surely not perfect, but he's pretty okay in my book.
I'm a Jimmy Carter man, myself.
Only just today?
Don’t blame him, they had that bias because we’re friends, and I would be perfect if not for my excessive modesty.
AT this point it is safe to assume you will fall for scams like this in your life. They are too like the real thing. We need the laws and police to catch up to investigating this thus making crime not pay (most of this is from countries that don't work with police - so probably some major international efforts required as well).
I almost fell for a bank scam a couple years back. Basically, I had just gotten a new phone w/ GrapheneOS, which doesn't have Google's scam number protection (I was well aware, that's not the issue) and I hadn't yet transferred my contacts, and I received a call about a fraud alert on a card. This has happened a few times, and usually it's a pretty straightforward call where they verify my identity before asking me about certain transactions. As a bit of background, I was on vacation at the time and I got the call while waiting in the parking lot while my SO ordered something at a food truck.
Anyway, the call progressed like this:
- Mentioned , which I have
- Asked to verify my identity with a code to my phone - standard
- Went over a couple suspicious transactions, which I confirmed wasn't me
- Asked to verify my identity again, and that's where I got suspicious, so I didn't provide it
I immediately called my bank and sorted things out, and we figured out nothing was stolen because I didn't provide the second code (that was to link an external account to suck my money out). Because I was in an unfamiliar setting and honestly pretty tired (we drove all day the day before), I just skimmed the text in step 2 w/o reading that it was a user-initiated code (i.e. for a password reset) instead of a bank initiated code (i.e. verify identity).
I consider myself a pretty security-conscious person. I use a password manager, MFA everywhere I can (preferring TOTP), I'm a lead backend SW engineer who has caught multiple security issues, etc. However, I fell for the scam and missed the safeguard that should have protected me. Fortunately it all worked out, but I did have to change all of my account numbers and login, which wasn't particularly fun while on vacation. That bank is fortunately one of the few that supports TOTP in my country, though I had avoided setting it up because it required a special app (Symantec VIP) and calling in (no self-service). I now have it set up and feel much better about my account security.
I'm fairly certain I annoy the people at my bank because I always insist on calling them back at their official number if they ask for any personal information. I don't fuck around with my bank security. I did however get got a couple of more years ago back when the chrome browser window phishing attack first started and had my Steam account stolen for a solid minute.
That's the attack where they simulate a browser window so what you think is a oauth popup is actually just inpage javascript and CSS.
Yeah, I'd really rather avoid waiting on hold every time there's a fraud alert or something. It doesn't happen a lot, but I have a lot of cards (like 10) and I often have one that gets an alert most years. It's usually not an issue, especially since I don't usually have money at the same institutions where I have a credit card, this was a special one where it's a card I only use at like 3 places (Steam being one of them) because it's for purely personal spending (as opposed to "family" spending).
If I wasn't on vacation, hadn't just gotten a new phone (I enter my bank's numbers as contacts), or wasn't impatient (I was hungry and waiting for food), it wouldn't have been an issue. It was just a perfect storm of opportunity. Now it's even less likely because I now use TOTP and my understanding is that there's no reason the bank would ever ask for that code (I think they only send text).
It happens.
Asked to verify my identity with a code to my phone - standard
No, absolutely not standard. This is where red flags should go up. If your bank texts you a code when you log in, then that's what the scammers are doing (trying to log in as you, triggering the website to send you the code to confirm that it's you logging in (except it's not you, it's them), and then getting you to tell them the code so they can finish logging into your account.
There are two types of texts:
- 2FA - usually says something like "we'll never text you this code, don't give it to anyone"
- ID verification - pushed by a rep while on a call, and doesn't have the "we'll never text you this code" bit
The first is needed for user-initiated actions, the second is only used to ensure the person you're talking to has access to the device on file.
When I called the actual bank, they did the second one to reset my account credentials, and again when I set up the MFA app after the trip. It's absolutely a thing. When I call for help navigating the website, the person on the phone walks me through the SMS verification process, but explicitly tells me to not tell them that first type of code.
Scammers do the first and cannot do the second, which is why they have the warning text on the first and not the second (though there is different warning, which makes it clear they're different). My fail was skimming the text for the number and ignoring the warning about not giving it to anyone.
That's exactly the issue, how do you prosecute hackers from countries that either a) don't care because they're collapsing/at war/etc or b) actively encourage hackers like DPRK, Russia, China.
There's no way to realistically police it without some One World Government type shit. All we can do is practice good security.
I'm just glad I got my parents trained enough to immediately contact me for anything that seems "off". The result is that they panic needlessly almost daily, but I still prefer that over getting the dreaded "they emptied all our accounts" call.
Perhaps Jason Statham can be part of the solution, a la The Beekeeper
If anyone hasn't seen the videos Jim Browning did a while back about gaining access to a india scam call centers network and subsequently, thier cameras, its a fascinating watch but also pretty concerning.
https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PLBNmQJqxpaMaxqghShRiOnHUjO00ZCsor
One of the worst parts is that sometimes the police are on the scammers payroll, making it hard to take action. It would likely take an international effort to even make a dent against these kinds of places. They make a ton of money off these scams so its going to keep happening.
police excelling at anything other than enforcing a state monopoly on violence
I, too, would love to live in a fantasy world
Solving the "being human" part of security will probably never happen, which is why you're encouraged to do stuff like use 2FA, different passwords, service isolation and stuff like that.
Anyone and everyone can be fooled at some point, best to try and limit the damage.
I just never click links in email.
If you use a password manager it won't fill credentials because it will be the wrong domain
Exactly. Put as many obstacles as possible into the path of scammers, and give yourself as many chances as possible to stop said scammers, and all without making services too annoying to use.
MFA + password manager seems to work well.
FIDO2 and security keys are the closest things we have to a solution. Unfortunately far too few companies support them. It would have saved him here because each credential only works with the proper URL for it.
Happens to the best.
I work for a managed service provider, and security for our clients is one of our most important goals.
Our CEO accidentally got phished then sent out emails to all our clients. We rolled with it by explaining kinda what you just said.
I've clicked an obvious phishing link once in an isolated environment with a hardened browser on purpose. It had a tracking link and all and the URL was just ever so slightly off. Nothing happened on the target page though. No attempted script execution, no iframes, no cross site shenanigans, no weird popups or a fake login UI urging me to enter my credentials asap.
Someone from my company's security department called me shortly, telling me how I've failed the obvious phishing exercise and I had to undergo a half hour long mandatory awareness training. Wasn't getting out of that one.
If you look at the headers, you can tell which ones are fake phishing and real phishing.
He must have been really tired, he even stated all the warning signs he ignored.
If anything it should just be a warning that literally anyone can make a mistake due to stress/fatigue/whatever
I’m not just the owner, I’m also a member!
The original article: https://www.troyhunt.com/a-sneaky-phish-just-grabbed-my-mailchimp-mailing-list/
Don't password managers verify the domain name before offering credentials?
Does that mean he doesn't use a password manager?
Edit: RIP, now that's a proper phishing. I understand where he's coming from
He mentioned that he does and the password manager didn't prompt to autocomplete the password automatically, so he had to force it.
The thing that should have saved my bacon was the credentials not auto-filling from 1Password, so why didn't I stop there? Because that's not unusual. There are so many services where you've registered on one domain (and that address is stored in 1Password), then you legitimately log on to a different domain.
Then add multiple URLs for that entry. You can even have it match on the base domain, so it works on any subdomain, or restrict it to a subdomain.
I assume that works on 1Password, it works on Bitwarden at least.
That said, I could see myself making this mistake. I've had to manually find entries before for one reason or another (e.g. usually use the app, but access the website this one time).
It does work there. The unfortunate thing is that so many sites change their login structure often enough that it no unusual to discover that a site just changed again and you need to update the list.
Yeah,.there are plenty of instances where I'm adding a new URL for a password because the app and the website are too different from each other, or the app changes its login paths...
Or heck, sometimes it's close enough, and with my password manager on my phone, I don't have it auto fill -- I have it auto-suggest. So "Probably a match" and "Exact match" have the same path to entry.
Not everyone uses a browser extension for their password manager.
Depends... if you use an offline password manager ( like keepass), you can ask it to autotype your credentials into anything... if that's what you ask it to do (ie it's not a fault)
Main point though: don't reuse the same credentials across different sites.
They'll get 1 site, but not all the rest of them...
Thats why we have RSS feeds. Thats how I follow Troy