this post was submitted on 02 Sep 2025
451 points (95.2% liked)

memes

17322 readers
1192 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/Ads/AI SlopNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live. We also consider AI slop to be spam in this community and is subject to removal.

A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment

Sister communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] s@piefed.world 72 points 1 week ago (3 children)

No, because all aces are born fully gods.

[–] CyberEgg@discuss.tchncs.de 18 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It is a very cishet perspective.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] samus12345@sh.itjust.works 11 points 1 week ago
[–] WrittenInRed@piefed.blahaj.zone 52 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I mean based on Mary Magdalene, I'd assume feet.

[–] 0ops@piefed.zip 18 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I would watch a Tarantino bible movie

[–] hakunawazo@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

*Rolls big stone away* (rest of script like Kill Bill)

[–] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 44 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Or he could be just asexual, that's a thing too.

[–] GreenKnight23@lemmy.world 14 points 1 week ago (1 children)

boobs....or ass.....

just because you hate to eat pumpkin pie doesn't mean you don't understand what your preference is between with and without whipped cream.

[–] WalrusDragonOnABike@reddthat.com 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I don't even try to eat pumpkin pie. I have no clue how to even compare whipped cream vs no whipped cream.

[–] Wolf@lemmy.today 3 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I have no clue how to even compare whipped cream vs no whipped cream.

Do you like whipped cream?

[–] WalrusDragonOnABike@reddthat.com 2 points 1 week ago (4 children)

I don't think so? But I assume the same for the pie itself. And who knows how it would be together (most people, but not me) - some things are bad by themselves but good with certain things. And if the option is for a smaller piece with whipped cream, that might be less bad than a full sized piece without cream.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] lemsip@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Sure, but I wouldn't put it on my vegetables.
Can't say if I'd like it on pumpkin pie without trying pumpkin pie.

(I do actually want to try pumpkin pie, but I've never seen one before)

[–] Wolf@lemmy.today 2 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Where are you from if you don't mind me asking?

Pumpkin Pie is one of those things that you just have to experience to know if you like it. If you do try it I highly recommend it with Whipped Cream. Chances are if you like whipped cream than you will like the combo.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Fleur_@aussie.zone 35 points 1 week ago (1 children)

There are no people who don't have sexual desires, obviously

[–] Konstant@lemmy.world 26 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Asexuals: am I a joke to you?

[–] Opisek@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Strong desires for garlic bread

[–] Cort@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

So not vampires, but have we ruled out werewolves?

[–] WalrusDragonOnABike@reddthat.com 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Guess dragons can also be werewolves?

[–] Ceedoestrees@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

Scary dragon turns into a wolf on the full moon, becoming significantly less of a threat.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] hungryphrog@lemmy.blahaj.zone 27 points 1 week ago (2 children)

guess asexuals aren't fully human

[–] TwoBeeSan@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

I mean. The Lord said.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] mienshao@lemmy.world 26 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] ivanafterall@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

Not mutually exclusive, but okay.

[–] Alwaysnownevernotme@lemmy.world 19 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)
[–] ivanafterall@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

And a guy guy. Maybe a bi guy.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Wutchilli@feddit.org 17 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Men (i mean look at all the Apostel jesus gatherd around him)

[–] rockerface@lemmy.cafe 10 points 1 week ago

That is not mutually exclusive with the question

[–] zout@fedia.io 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Isn't that because women weren't allowed in? I mean, I once saw a documentary about that time and place where it was shown women would pretend to be male and wear false beards so they could attend a stoning.

[–] frezik@lemmy.blahaj.zone 11 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Yes, no, it's complicated. Early Christianity did push back against some masculine norms of the time. For example, Jesus saying that you should only divorce in cases of cheating was a help for women at the time. Men were divorcing their wives for whatever reason and leaving them destitute. However, now it's flipped around by fundamentalist churches to say that's the rule for all time, and that means women can't leave an abusive husband. So what was intended as help for women is now a harm.

1 Corinthians 14:34,35 ("women should remain silent in churches") was probably stuck in there later on. The passage around it reads more naturally without it. From verse 26 on, it has an egalitarian outlook in saying that anyone who feels inspired should be allowed to stand up and speak their mind until someone else has an inspiration. Then it hits verse 34, and suddenly it's "but not women".

And it's interesting that a fundamentalist church might not approve women to even speak in church, citing this scripture as the reason, but not running their service in any other way that passage says.

[–] squaresinger@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Btw, he was talking about Life of Brian.

Still interesting though, having grown up in that environment, hearing about how it was shaped over time and questioning some of the batshit crazy bits is very useful.

I'm not in this comment thread elsewhere, just found the analysis useful

[–] JcbAzPx@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

He had a fine collection of sea men.

[–] HikingVet@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 week ago

So, chest hair?

[–] Sparky@lemmy.blahaj.zone 11 points 1 week ago
[–] SlartyBartFast@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Is that the guy from Fallout New Vegas

[–] mrlemmyhimself@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Joshua Graham, the Burned Man

[–] Snowpix@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 week ago

The Malpais Legate.

[–] ArnaulttheGrim@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago (5 children)

Someone hasnt read St Thomas Aquinas...

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 week ago (2 children)

BTW the character under the comment is Joshua Graham aka the Burned Man, if you can't guess based off the name the character is Mormon or Mormon derived at least. But if my understanding of Mormon theology is correct he would be of the opinion that Jesus fucks.

[–] Snowpix@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Fucking, when done righteously, is a chore like any other.

[–] vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

IDK who down voted you but you got a solid snort from me.

[–] PugJesus@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago

We can't expect God to do all the cooming

[–] IndolentRoshi@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

I happen to know by divine revelation: he was fully boobs man, fully ass man

Hell yeah, new vegas mentioned

[–] ivanafterall@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

I'm disappointed there's nobody here so far proudly standing and saying, "ASS, YOU FOOLS!" So I'm stepping forward. Boobs are wonderful, but dat aaassss doe.

load more comments
view more: next ›