this post was submitted on 31 Aug 2025
443 points (98.7% liked)

News

31960 readers
2477 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Donald Trump has said he will issue an executive order to mandate identification for all US elections, a move likely to be challenged in court as unconstitutional.

"Voter I.D. Must Be Part of Every Single Vote. NO EXCEPTIONS! I Will Be Doing An Executive Order To That End!!!,” the US president said on Truth Social late on Saturday.

Trump also claimed he wants to ban all voting by mail except for those who are very ill or in military service.

The US constitution grants primary authority to regulate elections to the US states, while empowering Congress to enact election laws or regulations. It gives no explicit authority to the president to regulate voting.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 90 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] Bonesince1997@lemmy.world 22 points 2 days ago
[–] blattrules@lemmy.world 54 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Can he just go back to being dead?

that photo is from tuesday. not sure he ain't

[–] StrawberryPigtails@lemmy.sdf.org 42 points 2 days ago (5 children)

He can fuck on off. That’s up to the States.

[–] zbyte64@awful.systems 4 points 1 day ago

And admission to the capital is up to the don now.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] DirkMcCallahan@lemmy.world 39 points 2 days ago

I like the way the headline implies that he openly admitted that the order would be unconstitutional.

[–] Diddlydee@feddit.uk 37 points 2 days ago (7 children)

He'll be dead before the next election.

Bet your house on it.

[–] alekwithak@lemmy.world 66 points 2 days ago

No thanks, betting against this man hasn't worked out for me yet, and I'm much too poor to spare the roof over my head when reality bends over backwards to appease this man again.

[–] Sir_Kevin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 21 points 2 days ago (3 children)
[–] Zagam@piefed.social 15 points 2 days ago (3 children)

I do but only by right of conquest. Or whatever it's called when your parents die and leave you the house they had their parents help them get.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] distantsounds@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago

House owning guys are betting on shit,,get in

load more comments (1 replies)

Grant imahara who actually had something to give to this world died in his '50s unexpectedly from an aneurysm.

Don't bet your fucking life on it with how karma doesn't work

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago

Yeah, because there won't be another election while that shit stain is still alive

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] takeda@lemmy.dbzer0.com 30 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Cool, and he also will release the unredacted Epstein files like he promised.

[–] zbyte64@awful.systems 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Only if we beat it from him like a pinata.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 29 points 2 days ago

So sick of just one fucking asshole in this country able to torment millions of us.

[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 28 points 1 day ago

The use of executive orders to rule by decree is itself unconstitutional.

[–] Lushed_Lungfish@lemmy.ca 22 points 1 day ago

Um, so this IS the party of "small government", yes?

[–] Dogiedog64@lemmy.world 20 points 1 day ago

Hey Donny, that's great and all, but where are the Epstein files? Inquiring minds need to know!

[–] elucubra@sopuli.xyz 16 points 1 day ago (1 children)

You don't have to have proof of identity to vote in the US?

[–] impeccablepenguin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 16 points 1 day ago (4 children)

In states that do not require an ID, you still need to present a document with your name. It is then compared with the voter registration database. The argument against requiring an ID is that ID's aren't free in the US, which can cause a financial hurdle for many.

[–] Uruanna@lemmy.world 16 points 1 day ago

And there's additional hurdles for more targeted populations, like access to the place that gives you the ID, and the capacity to prove your ID to that place with specific documents that may ormay not exist. It's on purpose.

[–] Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca 16 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Sounds like a solution would be some sort of national ID card provided for free?

[–] xycu@programming.dev 23 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Republicans and conservatives, historically, have been the biggest opponents of a national ID because they don't want the federal government tracking them or asserting any control over anything.

Until trump, anyway...

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] frongt@lemmy.zip 7 points 1 day ago

Yes, but that would actually be a good thing so it's never happened.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Atomicbunnies@lemmy.dbzer0.com 15 points 1 day ago (1 children)

EOs arnt laws.. Congress still has to make them into laws.

[–] zbyte64@awful.systems 23 points 1 day ago (3 children)

There's the legal tactic of: do now and ask for forgiveness never. It works really well when there are no legal consequences.

[–] Atomicbunnies@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

But it isn't even a legal tactic. EOs mean nothing. They are not laws.

[–] zbyte64@awful.systems 4 points 1 day ago

They obviously mean something until they are stuck down, and even then...

[–] mic_check_one_two@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Yup, flood the courts and demand appeals whenever judges block things. The goal is to overwhelm the system in the short term. While judges and lawyers are busy setting court dates that are weeks away, the regime will carry on as if the EO is legal.

[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It works really well when there are no legal consequences.

There are other consequences than legal ones.

[–] Pofski@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago

none so far i would say.

[–] foggy@lemmy.world 15 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] Endymion_Mallorn@kbin.melroy.org 10 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 14 points 2 days ago

I have. Is all good, yes?

collapsed inline media

[–] atzanteol@sh.itjust.works 14 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I Will Be Doing An Executive Order

President of the United States.

Trump is way too fucking lazy to press the shift key before every word. I just do not believe that he writes his own tweets. I'd like to see just one video of him visibly typing out a tweet that is then published. I'd bet that if you cross-referenced when his tweets are posted with his golf schedule, you'd find that at least some of them are written by somebody else.

[–] WanderWisley@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago

Can we 100% confirmed that Donny actually made this statement and that it wasn’t a body double? And also RELEASE THE EPSTEIN FILES.

[–] Colonel_Panic_@eviltoast.org 8 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Fucking hell I hate to even say this, but this might be the first thing he has ever done that I might agree with. But hear me out before you crucify me.

There isn't rampant voter fraud near to the level MAGA claims. They imply it's 50% fraudulent. It's really like 1% or less, and most of that gets caught anyway already.

I do think it is important to validate that the person casting the vote is registered and is the correct person casting the vote. But I would balance that requirement with common sense and I'd make getting any/all valid IDs easy and free (fully tax funded). From DL to Real ID to Military or whatever else. All free. All simple to get. All accessible to do. And I'd also make all elections a national holiday and expand mail in and online voting and early voting. Give people as much margin to get their vote in as possible.

Elections do need security, hell, I'm still not entirely convinced that Elon didn't do SOMETHING nefarious in this last one. He at very least was paying people which is illegal. But we need better encryptions and processes and forms of certifying that the ballots cast were indeed the correct intended vote and ways to go back and validate your own vote in a secure way. Make a portal where you can log in like your bank and see your vote history or something.

While we're at it. Abolish the damn college. Just make it all RCV and be done with all this shit with gerrymandering and arguing over the "least worst' candidate every cycle.

[–] smayonak@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago

Much less than 1%. Voter Fraud is so rare that it has no impact on elections. However the Republicans have been trying to pass a federal voter ID law (the SAVE act) which creates substantial barriers for married women who changed their last name from voting. The additional barriers will destroy democracy.

https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/why-voting-rights-groups-warn-the-save-act-may-make-it-harder-for-married-women-to-vote

[–] JoeBigelow@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Republicans would never win if they did all that, and Democrats would immediately be seriously challenged by Progressive candidates, so they aren't interested either.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 7 points 1 day ago

Also there will be underwear inspections and all underwear must now be worn on the outside of pants.

[–] HurlingDurling@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago

This was the plan for the "Real ID" all along

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago

He does care fuck if it is "legal" or "constitutional". Those terms do no longer exist as criteria.

[–] Nougat@fedia.io 7 points 2 days ago

I'm very ill.

[–] robocall@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

I can't see California ever enforcing this

load more comments
view more: next ›