this post was submitted on 29 Aug 2025
511 points (87.4% liked)

Political Memes

9333 readers
1755 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

No AI generated content.Content posted must not be created by AI with the intent to mimic the style of existing images

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] JusticeForPorygon@lemmy.blahaj.zone 77 points 4 days ago (40 children)

I've seen what feels like a hundred posts complaining about people saying we need to support Gavin Newsome no matter what but I have yet to see someone saying we need to support Gavin Newsome no matter what.

[–] missingno@fedia.io 32 points 4 days ago (4 children)

I have absolutely seen it.

[–] exmotoh@fgc.network 16 points 4 days ago

As have I, and they are sanctimonous, condescending, and tiresome in the extreme.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 24 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I personally had many people pile on me when I criticized him during the peak of his meming on Trump. But it does feel like the tide has turned against him a bit now.

[–] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 30 points 4 days ago (1 children)

They love the pointless, performative shit.

Look at what Newsom is actually doing: presiding over a state where, for the vast majority of his constituents, it's becoming unaffordable to live in while at the same time he is actively criminalizing homelessness.

[–] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 28 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Absolutely. And he vetoed a lot of great bills seeking to address many of the state’s crises.

[–] return2ozma@lemmy.world 27 points 4 days ago (1 children)

He also vetoed ranked choice voting

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Catoblepas@piefed.blahaj.zone 16 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (8 children)

Yeah, those posts were in response to people being completely shitty about it.

Do you need me to link to some previous discussions where there are accusations of someone being an accelerationist who prefers Trump because they criticized Newsom? Because that was just yesterday. That’s not even touching the people who flat out say ‘I am absolutely willing to sacrifice trans rights because everyone else is more important’.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] Ryanmiller70@lemmy.zip 12 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I don't see it much on here, but they're everywhere on Bluesky. You can search Newsom's name and the first result will probably be someone talking shit about him with tons of comments and quote posts telling them they're just trying to get Trump to win a third term.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] hatorade@lemmy.world 9 points 3 days ago

It's literally in this thread.

load more comments (35 replies)
[–] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 56 points 4 days ago (6 children)

It's simple.

Vote for the Democratic nominee against the GOP in the general election.

If you live somewhere the Dems tend to win elections, vote in the Democratic primaries to change the party little by little.

If you live somewhere the GOP tends to win, vote in the GOP primaries to try and at least get rid of the MAGA Republicans and THEN vote for the Democratic candidate in the general election.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] hzl@lemmy.blahaj.zone 53 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (3 children)

If that's meant to be the DNC, okay.

If that's meant to be people who made an argument for coalition politics and not straight up forfeiting and election to the worst presidential candidate anyone could find lying around to stuff into a diaper and a suit and put behind a podium.. that's not really the same thing.

Gavin Newsom is not, at the moment, running for president. He's not sitting opposite some extreme right-winger serving as a disappointing but necessary defensive line between us and things getting much worse. He's an asshole who happens to be a Democrat and is the current governor of a state where he's actively making things worse. He, like Harris, would clearly be leaning toward the right to try to win center votes.

The reasonable strategic move to make for anyone who wants the government in the US to shift to the left is to make it clear that while his humiliating Trump is useful, he is not a viable candidate. Supporting him now would be backing a lame horse that's literally still in the stable during a time where we should be finding the healthiest, fastest horse we possibly can. That is not the same as if he were in an election right now and were the only way to prevent a Trump from getting into office.

I'm trans. I hope Newsom falls off a cliff. But if he had been running against Trump instead of Harris I would have held my nose and checked the box, because strategy isn't about throwing a fit until you get the scenario you want, it's about doing what you can with the hand you've got.

Right now what we can do is toss his ass away and draw another card from the deck before we end up being forced to play him.

[–] ghen@sh.itjust.works 8 points 3 days ago

There we go, that's the most complete and correct answer. High five internet friend.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Nougat@fedia.io 41 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Last I heard, Newsom was not currently a candidate for any election, criticize all you want.

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 13 points 4 days ago (5 children)

The dude's whole career goal is to be president.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] balderdash9@lemmy.zip 33 points 4 days ago (6 children)

When it's someone they don't like the discussion turns around "electability". But they always want us to get in line for a pro-establishment center-left corporate Democrat.

[–] octopus_ink@slrpnk.net 36 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

They keep trying to court voters who will never ever vote for them instead of the people who they claim to share values with.

collapsed inline media

R stopped with that shit and surprise surprise they got Trump in. Tell me again how we could never have gotten Bernie in or how AOC is too radical...

[–] Doc_Crankenstein@slrpnk.net 18 points 4 days ago (1 children)

It's almost like if you create a platform that completely disenfranchises your voting base to try and appeal to your opponent, people won't continue to support you when you show that you no longer protect their interests.

It's always, for decades now, attempt after attempt to appeal to the "moderates" and "reach across the aisle" to get R's to flip but never are they allowed to move the needle to the left otherwise they get ousted as being "too radical", in order to pull in the gigantic swatch of the population who do not participate because they see that no one actually gives a shit about them.

[–] octopus_ink@slrpnk.net 18 points 4 days ago

It’s always, for decades now, attempt after attempt to appeal to the “moderates” and “reach across the aisle” to get R’s to flip but never are they allowed to move the needle to the left otherwise they get ousted as being “too radical”

100% entirely correct!

collapsed inline media

[–] LookBehindYouNowAndThen@lemmy.world 34 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I'm sure one of these days conservatives will vote for the (D). We just have to keep trying to meet them in the middle for another thirty years! Let's try putting one of the Cheneys on the ballot next time.

Now whose rights are we gonna sacrifice first? I vote old people's.

[–] resipsaloquitur@lemmy.world 10 points 4 days ago

Overton’s carrot.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] GroundedGator@lemmy.world 25 points 3 days ago (8 children)

We haven't even entered midterm season yet and we're arguing about Newsom's viability. The focus should be on midterms. We still have 2 years for a new star to shine, for a progressive to break through, for the DNC to maybe get a clue.

I'd rather hear discussions about who is best to face off against Collins, how can we take back some of the house seats where the margins are thinnest, where could we break in.

There will never be a perfect candidate for any office. You will always have issues you don't align on. If you think you align on everything, you're probably not looking closely enough. Vote for freedom, join the conversation and advocate for change. I have seen many politicians change their beliefs over the years, often their positions are uninformed and giving them the right information can help and assuming they know the facts helps no one.

We are all flawed. We have all made mistakes. We are all capable of change. Politicians are no less suited to making mistakes than we are.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] Smoogs@lemmy.world 19 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (4 children)

Just so people know Gavin newsom made a comment about trans children in sports.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/gavin-newsom-rages-about-trans-kids-in-sports-how-democrats-hate-his-stance/ar-AA1INrLO

And political influential dems have had issues with mamdani for issues ranging from tax policies (tax rich as too ambitious) to lack of stance regarding Israel

https://www.newsweek.com/full-list-new-york-democrats-not-endorsing-zohran-mamdani-2092616

This is the info that’s missing.

Just tired of people dropping headline bombs with no story and just expecting others to follow suit on a dime . All this talk about echo chambers but we can’t possibly take the time to educate people.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Donjuanme@lemmy.world 12 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I'm blue no matter who. Fuck yeah go new York Mayor (why the fuck is this getting so much attention), fuck yeah go newsome (why the fuck is this getting so much attention before the primary has even been announced? Before the midterms....)

Blue no matter who and asking again. WHERE THE FUCK are the EPSTEIN FILES? Me and my autocorrect friend 🦆 need to know.

[–] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 14 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (3 children)

Blue no matter who is for the general election though. That’s still over 3 years away. I’ll be here shitting on Newsom every day up until he’s a nominee in a competitive race against a fascist.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] tidderuuf@lemmy.world 8 points 4 days ago (3 children)

Newsom also shills harder for corporations than Trump does which means Newsom has a real chance of winning. Whoops.

[–] NaibofTabr@infosec.pub 33 points 4 days ago (2 children)
[–] BrokenGlepnir@lemmy.world 10 points 4 days ago

"Everything's computer!"

[–] resipsaloquitur@lemmy.world 9 points 4 days ago

If only this was the most embarrassing thing he’d done.

[–] BeefandSquints@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Newsom sucks but when you lie it's just weird. Are you saying you prefer Trump?

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›