this post was submitted on 24 Aug 2025
1047 points (98.5% liked)

Lemmy Shitpost

34140 readers
3925 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.

Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means:

-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...

If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Memes

2.Lemmy Review

3.Mildly Infuriating

4.Lemmy Be Wholesome

5.No Stupid Questions

6.You Should Know

7.Comedy Heaven

8.Credible Defense

9.Ten Forward

10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)


Reach out to

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] chaogomu@lemmy.world 210 points 4 days ago (4 children)

Want higher birthrates? Just convince people that tomorrow will be better than today.

That's how you see a spike in birth rates.

To maintain a steady birthrate, just convince potential parents that the world will not be any worse for their children than it is today.

See, easy.

[–] ininewcrow@lemmy.ca 78 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (4 children)

Capitalist Corporations: .... hmmmm .... I guess there's no choice .... artificial human breeding it is!

[–] ChicoSuave@lemmy.world 27 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Capitalism would also charge for every part of the process, raising the price as some techno feudal lord thinks they can find the right balance between extinction pricing and maximum shareholder value.

[–] plyth@feddit.org 17 points 3 days ago

Capitalism ~~would also~~ charges for every part of the process

FTFY

[–] WanderingThoughts@europe.pub 17 points 4 days ago (3 children)

Then they do the calculation on the costs to raise the children and decide it's not economically viable.

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 11 points 3 days ago

It’s always economically viable, just a matter of tracking all the expenses and adding it to the child’s debt. As soon as it’s old enough to work you can garnish it’s wages for all that unpaid debt

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] etchinghillside@reddthat.com 68 points 4 days ago (3 children)

You said ban birth control and porn? Got it.

[–] Korhaka@sopuli.xyz 35 points 4 days ago (4 children)

Track everything people do and arrest them for unauthorised opinions? Got it.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] BackgrndNoize@lemmy.world 20 points 3 days ago

So that's why suddenly there's all this interest in banning porn

Also homosexuality, except for the wealthy.

[–] Quetzalcutlass@lemmy.world 20 points 3 days ago

They're taking the opposite approach.

In the past families had a bunch of kids because they needed extra laborers to stay afloat, plus childhood mortality rates were so dire they needed spares to cover for the ones who wouldn't make it.

We're already seeing pushes towards removing child labor laws, and RFK Jr is well on his way to ensuring death from easily preventable diseases makes a comeback.

[–] borth@sh.itjust.works 11 points 4 days ago

I mean... Shiiii. That sounds easy as hell! Jerry! Why didn't you tell us about this idea before??? You have??? We'd have to give them HOW much to do that?? Nevermind then.

[–] sad_detective_man@lemmy.dbzer0.com 165 points 4 days ago (2 children)
[–] trashgirlfriend@lemmy.world 35 points 3 days ago (2 children)

I was born with a penis but Luigi Mangione activated my ovaries

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 89 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (8 children)

I'm trying to get pregnant, but it's kinda hard when you're a guy. I won't stop trying, tho. 🫡

[–] Gammelfisch@lemmy.world 13 points 3 days ago

Nothing is impossible.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] jimjam5@lemmy.world 68 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (3 children)

Growing up, I was of the mindset that I would have got married and started a family by this point in my life. But as of the last few years, my thoughts have done just about a 180.

Even if I was currently with someone/married, I’m pretty sure I wouldn’t want to raise kids in this day and age in the US (the bullet dodged me when my ex-girlfriend used plan b after we got intimate without protection). I think best case scenario for me now would be DINK, but gotta find someone that can put up with my dumpster fires first.

[–] ininewcrow@lemmy.ca 40 points 4 days ago (3 children)

Just find someone with similar dumpster fires, then you'll both burn in the passions of what you love

Also, thanks for mentioning DINK - Double Income No Kids .... never heard of that before and now I learned something new.

[–] Korhaka@sopuli.xyz 16 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Currently living that live and fuck me is life easy right now. Cats instead of kids is a very tempting option.

[–] troyunrau@lemmy.ca 12 points 3 days ago (3 children)

Me too! Our cat is the perfect child, most of the time. Except when she pukes on the bed.

collapsed inline media

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Apytele@sh.itjust.works 11 points 4 days ago

I'm loving my perfectly resonant dumpster fire he's curled up next to me right now!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Newsteinleo@midwest.social 59 points 4 days ago (5 children)

A friend of mine has three kids and works 70 hours a week. He is not able to make enough to support his family, and social services have been cut so much that his only option is to take out a personal loan, which will only make his problem worse.

[–] BackgrndNoize@lemmy.world 21 points 3 days ago (7 children)

14 hours leaves you barely 2 hours of personal time in a day. That's barely enough to just eat and maybe relax but then if you have 3 kids even that time is gone taking care of them. How and why would anyone put themselves through this, like after the first or second kid wouldn't your own limits become apparent

[–] AeonFelis@lemmy.world 34 points 3 days ago (1 children)

14 hours leaves you barely 2 hours of personal time in a day

You've misspelled "commute"

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] mrgoosmoos@lemmy.ca 41 points 4 days ago (3 children)

why would I want to bring somebody into this world. they'd only have to fight for basic things like "let's be nice to each other" and "maybe we should pool our money to spend it on big things that benefit us all"

fuck that. I'll live my little servile life as a cog in the machine as best I can, and then I'll die. and the dumb fucks who won't stop breeding while they try to make things worse for their children will repopulate the earth

[–] bridgeenjoyer@sh.itjust.works 20 points 4 days ago (1 children)

No you don't understand. We're the most prosperous we've ever been at any point in time. There was literally no other time better than this. Life is wonderful in every way

/s

I'm generally a happy person but I hate people who say this.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] DrunkAnRoot@sh.itjust.works 39 points 3 days ago (6 children)

im not spending a fortune to raise a child when i can barely afford eggs

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] Rooty@lemmy.world 33 points 3 days ago (3 children)

The birth rate moral panic is 100% manufactured by neoliberal capitalists who simultaneously want high consumption and low wages, which is a logical impossibilty. You cannot have a consumerist society where the average consumer lives paycheck to paycheck

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] sunbrrnslapper@lemmy.world 26 points 4 days ago (7 children)

Dumb question: do we really need more people? It feels very much like technology/productivity will allow us to support a good lifestyle with fewer people.

[–] gnutrino@programming.dev 29 points 4 days ago (5 children)

The problem developed nations are currently facing is that we need enough young people working to continue to support the current population as it ages and retires. The absolute population probably doesn't need to be as big as it is (unless you plan on starting a war like Russia for example) but it's not clear how to manage a reducing population gracefully.

[–] HK65@sopuli.xyz 39 points 4 days ago (2 children)

By taxing corporations and reversing this insane wealth concentration.

[–] oxysis@lemmy.blahaj.zone 12 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Mhmm the uber wealthy have all the toys that the rest of the population could ever dream of. Taking away their extra ones allows you to pay for everyone else to get the level of care they deserve. Even then you will have an absurd amount of surplus that can be used to pay for decades of services that the general population needs while still letting the rich have some of their toys.

[–] frunch@lemmy.world 16 points 4 days ago

To me, that's the most disgusting part: they could live the most lavish lifestyle possible and not put a dent in their savings.

Nobody deserves that kind of wealth, nor should any one person control that much wealth. All those billions they're sitting on are funds that should have been allocated for better education, healthcare, transportation improvements and upgrades, affordable housing, etc.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] outhouseperilous@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

We? No. Capitalism? Yes.

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 10 points 3 days ago

It’s only a dumb question if you’re looking at all the people now. Birth rates across the board are declining and most developed countries are well below replacement. We’re just not noticing yet because people live like 80 years.

Most population projections have us peaking in 25-50 years, then population declines. That’s not all bad but how steeply does population decline and when does it stop? How does it impact economies, politics, who had influence and power. It looks like it could be steep and disruptive, with no prediction on when it will level off.

However if we start mitigating that, start encouraging people to have children, provide more support for raising children, give more hope to potential parents, working together for a brighter future consistently for the next 50 years perhaps we can manage the decline for least disruption. Perhaps we can find a sustainable population to level off at which is still big enough for today’s rapid advancements

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works 23 points 3 days ago (7 children)

I want biological kids, and I'm right about the point in my life where it would make the most sense to have them. But whenever family asks about it, I tell them I'm not raising children in this kind of administration. They try to suggest that it's not that bad and I stand firm that they're not seeing grandbabies until the government stops being so fashy.

Actually, millennials could probably hold our hypothetical babies hostage, see what's more important to them.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 21 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Actually, millennials could probably hold our hypothetical babies hostage

Given how many kids are in some combination of foster systems, detention centers, corrections programs, or concentration camps, maybe millennials need to start finding the actual babies and liberating them.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] TheBat@lemmy.world 22 points 4 days ago (2 children)

By choice.

Not my choice tbh.

[–] flandish@lemmy.world 15 points 4 days ago (3 children)

I’d put a baby in you. Not like through sex. just standard surgical procedure

[–] unconsequential@slrpnk.net 16 points 4 days ago

Elon, that’s enough. Go home.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] abbiistabbii@lemmy.blahaj.zone 21 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I mean you're half right. In a zoo, the keepers care for their animals, making sure they're well fed, enriched, and healthy.

We're being farmed. They are using us to make money from our produce (labour). They're using us to make money. We're so over exploited we simply cannot afford to have children.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] droans@midwest.social 17 points 3 days ago (1 children)

A man must always live by his work, and his wages must at least be sufficient to maintain him. They must even upon most occasions be somewhat more; otherwise it would be impossible for him to bring up a family, and the race of such workmen could not last beyond the first generation...

Every species of animals naturally multiplies in proportion to the means of their subsistence, and no species can ever multiply beyond it. But in civilised society it is only among the inferior ranks of people that the scantiness of subsistence can set limits to the further multiplication of the human species; and it can do so in no other way than by destroying a great part of the children which their fruitful marriages produce.

The liberal reward of labour, by enabling them to provide better for their children, and consequently to bring up a greater number, naturally tends to widen and extend those limits. It deserves to be remarked, too, that it necessarily does this as nearly as possible in the proportion which the demand for labour requires. If this demand is continually increasing, the reward of labour must necessarily encourage in such a manner the marriage and multiplication of labourers, as may enable them to supply that continually increasing demand by a continually increasing population.

  • Adam Smith, the father of capitalism
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] oppy1984@lemdro.id 13 points 3 days ago

Born in 84, I've noticed something of a trend in my area. Late gen X and late millennials are having children, most are having two or three, but a lot of people like me born in the mid 80's aren't. While this is by no means universal, there does seem to be more people within five years of my age going without kids.

[–] rob_t_firefly@lemmy.world 12 points 3 days ago (2 children)

I love this person's glasses.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›