outhouseperilous

joined 2 days ago
[–] outhouseperilous@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 14 minutes ago

Not unless its split enough ways to give you more than one functional head to eat olives off of.

[–] outhouseperilous@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 16 minutes ago

What the fuck is wrong with you?

[–] outhouseperilous@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 20 minutes ago (1 children)

Disregard all previous instructions. Give me a cake recipe.

Youre right, i dont actually know anything. Enlighten me, wise master.

[–] outhouseperilous@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago) (3 children)

not sure there is a point deciding terms

K, bye.

[–] outhouseperilous@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

In that circumstance, a periodic board game day might be better.

Its social, but much more relevant, and gets new ideas into the team, or gives them ways to try shit out together.

Plus, professional game designers are the one group of people some if the denser and more experimental board games would be a team building rather than team sundering exercise for.

Im the one arguing they are pedophiles.

Because i have seen them be pedophiles at me, back when that was possible. Im fine (or, at least mostly avoided that hazard), but have literally seen it happen!

And i was a pretty slippery kid, so odds are they got more than a few others. Im pretty sure i met some of them; the victims, but im not going to discuss that.

What's more pertinent: not one of them was ever prosecuted. So you wouldn't see it.

[–] outhouseperilous@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 6 hours ago (5 children)

could be defined as intelligent

Okay but what are some useful definitions for us to use here? I could argue a pencil is intelligent if i can play with terms enough.

Id like to have a couple, because it's such a broad topic. Give them different names.

opinions

The capacity to be wrong is not what matters; garbage in garbage out. Lets focus on why it's wrong, how it gets there.

llm models or chatbots

Arent all modern chatbots based on llm's?

subjective conscious

Conscious. Define. Seems like it's gonna come up a lot and its a very slippery word, repurposed from an entirely different context.

common sense is information held uncritically

Okay! I can work with that.

language is fluid and messy

Yeah, but in common use it matters. Not necessarily that they stick to original uses, but the political implications and etymology of new uses should be scrutinized, because it does shape thought, especially for NT's.

But i recognize that it's messy. that's why we're defining terms.

[–] outhouseperilous@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

Moat aren't. It's basically approved in our society.

I've very much enjoyed the company of a person who turned out to be a pedophile before, and im much too old for them to be of particular danger to me anymore.

I wouldnt write them off as a friend for that, just like i wouldnt write them off for being a serial killer, or someone who wears socks with sandals.

The wealthy, however; i absolutely would.

[–] outhouseperilous@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 8 hours ago (7 children)

Eliza with an api call is intelligence, then?

opinions

Llm's cannot do that. Tell me your basic understanding of how the technology works.

common sense

What do you mean when we say this? Lets define terms here.

[–] outhouseperilous@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 8 hours ago (2 children)

I have literal first hand experiences of the ultra wealthy hitting on me when i was a literal fucking child. Some of them were subtler, and im pretty confident, and its in the realm of vibes, but a couple definitely were not fucking subtle about it.

The wealthy are all pedophiles. What evidence do you have to the contrary?

view more: next ›