this post was submitted on 23 Aug 2025
1 points (100.0% liked)

Science Memes

17237 readers
1319 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] stevedice@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 months ago (4 children)

Feynman. Dude must have some crazy stories. Seriously, who cares about science?

Have you ever read his non science books like Surely You're Joking Mr Feinman? They're fun.

[–] Cenotaph@mander.xyz 0 points 2 months ago

100%. Not only can he explain all this physics to an idiot like me, he's got more stories than anybody there

[–] mholiv@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago (3 children)

Why? He was relatively contemporary and lived a pretty normal life relative to most of us compared to the historical figures.

That and he was a mega sexist who made the lives of women in science much worse for literal decades.

https://youtu.be/TwKpj2ISQAc

[–] 4grams@awful.systems 0 points 2 months ago

To be frank, if you put Angela on this list my answer would be her a thousand times over. Shes just so damn engaging, love her content.

[–] outerspace@lemmy.zip 0 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Good video, knew what it was before clicking haha

[–] tfed@infosec.exchange 0 points 2 months ago

@mholiv Feynman was a smart theoretical physicist, but popular he was in "public" for being an asshole, unfortunately.

Meaning: Feynman was surely popular among physicists, he did a lot of important work, but among public he was famous not for his work, but for normal stories like StreepClub :ablobcatpopcorn:

[–] 4grams@awful.systems 0 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Agreed, not the person I respect the most or believe is going to reveal the most truth. But he’s the best one on the list to keep you engaged and entertained for 3 hours.

[–] DoucheBagMcSwag@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 2 months ago

I would love the chance to make fun of Feynman for 3 hours

[–] Korhaka@sopuli.xyz 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Feel like I would just disappoint 3 different people. What a cruel thing to bring someone back from the dead for.

[–] Jarix@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago

That's why I went to have Feynman step in for me and I'll just sit quietly in the corner listening

[–] Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Even putting aside the science, Einstein just seems like he was a really good dude. I feel like he'd be a chill person to hang with.

[–] FundMECFS@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 2 months ago

Yes exactly. Plus he was literally a socialist. I think I’d enjoy chatting with him the most.

[–] Crashumbc@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I'd almost be worried about being disappointed. He has been portrayed very favorably. Was he really like that though...

[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

None. I give my spot to someone who wouldn't waste it.

I can't speak on their level, and I'm okay with that. I've worked around some absolutely amazing geniuses in my career and I'm happy to be the worker bees in the arrangement. I'm no slouch, and I've done my own share of really cool stuff, but I wouldn't waste such an opportunity on me.

Give it to the Steve Baumels, the Tomas Bartas and the Jeff Linds of the world, the unsung bright spots in our tech march forward.

I'll save everyone a spot at lunch and try to get in on the group photo.

[–] ns1@feddit.uk 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

This was my first thought as well, sadly I'm probably not clever enough to fully appreciate and understand any of these people. If I'm not allowed to transfer my place then at least I can have some fun telling Da Vinci about planes and stuff

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] general_kitten@sopuli.xyz 0 points 2 months ago

i would imagine interview with leonardo could help historians quite a lot.

[–] bazzett@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

As a biologist, I'm offended that there isn't Darwin, nor Mayr, nor Lesquereux, nor Jay Gould nor Margulis.

So I take Leonardo. I also like to draw and paint. I would like to say Marie, but unfortunately I'm not immune to radiation.

[–] Crashumbc@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago

My first thought was Marie pre or post radiation?

Lol

[–] Gustephan@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago

Curie three times. Her work was so groundbreaking that she got name recognition on the same level as the rest of them as a woman in the late 1800s. Based on my experiences with modern women in stem, I'd expect she worked way harder to get where she did than any of the rest of them and as such I'd expect her insight to hold a lot more value. I'd pick Pierre too if he was also on the list

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 0 points 2 months ago

Leonardo. We both are AuDHD so it'll be a semi-productive 3 hours.

[–] kryptonianCodeMonkey@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago

Seems like it will be a one sided conversation. They're all dead.

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Are they time traveling to see me, or am I time traveling to see them?

Because if it's the latter, Hawking on June 28, 2009.

[–] Jarix@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago
[–] Crashumbc@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Was that his famous time travel party?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] MTK@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago (2 children)

I would need like a decade of prep to have any meaningful discussion with any of them 😅

[–] FinalRemix@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

See, I'd pick Feynman, and have him teach me bongos.

[–] Pulptastic@midwest.social 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

He’d teach you sex, the man was a walking hardon.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Worx@lemmynsfw.com 0 points 2 months ago

"Hey, I just raised you from the dead to talk to you. Fuck your physics, who's the smart one now, huh??"

[–] PrimeMinisterKeyes@leminal.space 0 points 2 months ago

Bohr, for sure.
I've read Feynman's biography, which, for the record, I would not recommend to everyone.
But he's witnessed Einstein and all of these early physics luminaries, and by his memorable account, everybody was in awe of Bohr, and Bohr only.
So I'd like to hear what the ruckus was about.

[–] Clent@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Edison but instead of talking to him, I Rick Roll him for three hours.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] stelelor@lemmy.ca 0 points 2 months ago (8 children)

Feynman, mainly because he was an amazing professor and knows how to talk to people.

Einstein and Newton disliked people, so they would be terrible conversationslists outside their areas of expertise. I think that was true of Leonardo as well. Edison is also out because he was a dick.

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›