this post was submitted on 13 Aug 2025
180 points (98.9% liked)

politics

25187 readers
2774 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The Trump administration is considering plans to create a squad of 600 National Guard soldiers who would be ready to deploy into U.S. cities to tackle civil unrest, according to a report.

As part of the “Domestic Civil Disturbance Quick Reaction Force,” troops would be equipped with weapons and riot gear, ready to deploy within an hour under the proposals, which could cost hundreds of millions of dollars, according to documents reviewed by The Washington Post.

Troops would be split in half, with 300 stationed at headquarters in Alabama and 300 in Arizona, according to the newspaper.

top 42 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ExtremeDullard@lemmy.sdf.org 51 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

part of the “Domestic Civil Disturbance Quick Reaction Force,” troops would be equipped with weapons and riot gear

So let's see, a sort of protection squadron with weapons... Hmm, I wonder what we could call it...

How about we use fancy German?

"Schutzstaffel" sounds spiffy. And "Waffen" for the weapons.

We could even shorten it to the even spiffier "Waffen SS".

[–] Kirp123@lemmy.world 15 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

We could also give them a cool insignia, maybe a skull so you know they mean business.

[–] Raptor_007@lemmy.world 4 points 11 hours ago

How about a nice Kermit the Frog?

[–] Rivalarrival@lemmy.today 41 points 16 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Formfiller@lemmy.world 4 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

No chance Trump just arranged for Maxwell to get out on “work Release”

[–] Rivalarrival@lemmy.today 5 points 6 hours ago

She's going to be named Secretary of Education.

Trump is also going to commute the last 5 years of Jared Fogle's sentence, and name him press secretary.

[–] ToadOfHypnosis@lemmy.world 38 points 18 hours ago

I’m sure it’s just a coincidence that this stuff always seems to “need” to be done when he’s in power.

[–] N0body@lemmy.dbzer0.com 26 points 18 hours ago

Wait until the $200 billion they put into ICE starts paying off. This shit is just testing the waters. By the midterms, they’ll be talking about “illegals” voting in elections and turning the ICE-enforced police state loose on the polls to intimidate voters.

In Nazi Germany, the “legal” enforcers stood over you while you either checked voting for the Nazi party or not. Russia’s elections are similar. America’s elections have had problems over the centuries, but they’ve never been that. Not on a national level across the board. It’s the KKK burning crosses everywhere all at once.

[–] minorkeys@lemmy.world 25 points 11 hours ago

Trump begins forming a unit of loyal soldiers who are willing to kill US citizens.

[–] N0t_5ure@lemmy.world 22 points 18 hours ago

Handmaid's Tale level of dystopia incoming....

[–] ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net 21 points 13 hours ago

So if ICE is modern day Gestapo this squad will be... SA? Aka Brownshirts?

[–] jojo@piefed.social 20 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Hmm, this sounds a lot like dictatorship, but maybe I'm wrong...

[–] Formfiller@lemmy.world 3 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

Yes it certainly seems that way

[–] JailElonMusk@sopuli.xyz 19 points 18 hours ago
[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 17 points 8 hours ago

Brown shirt bootlickers

[–] cyberpunk007@lemmy.ca 17 points 11 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Inucune@lemmy.world 11 points 9 hours ago

Civil war now.

[–] Gates9@sh.itjust.works 16 points 7 hours ago

“History doesn’t repeat itself, but it often rhymes”

collapsed inline media

[–] PattyMcB@lemmy.world 15 points 18 hours ago (3 children)

Let's convince all those supporters of his who are 2A supporters that this is bad, and sit back with some popcorn

[–] ToadOfHypnosis@lemmy.world 24 points 18 hours ago

Yeah it’s funny how the military always gets weaponized on civilian populations when their savior is in charge, but they swear they need their guns to defend freedom from democrats.

[–] rhvg@lemmy.world 9 points 17 hours ago (2 children)

Most 2Aers will happily become his SS.

[–] ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world 3 points 8 hours ago

Not really, a lot of them are pissed at Trump.

[–] onslaught545@lemmy.zip 1 points 21 minutes ago

Most of them couldn't make it through basic training without having a massive coronary.

[–] null_dot@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 17 hours ago

At this point I think it's pretty clear that none of them care about government overreach.

[–] lmdnw@lemmy.world 12 points 10 hours ago

Kill occupiers and oppressors.

[–] Zombiepirate@lemmy.world 7 points 3 hours ago

Do we call the Christian Nationalist task force that answers directly to the president the Pray-torian guard?

[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 6 points 3 hours ago

Release the trump/Epstein files

[–] marsza@lemmy.cafe 5 points 17 hours ago (2 children)

How much would 600 bullets cost?

[–] ouRKaoS@lemmy.today 2 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

There's a lot of variables there...

This is kind of like asking "How much for 600 sandwiches?"

[–] marsza@lemmy.cafe 4 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago) (1 children)

How much does the average .50 round cost? I figure we ought to give them something good.

Edit : Apparently it’s four dollars a round

[–] ouRKaoS@lemmy.today 2 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

.50bmg is about $5-$10 a round, on the low end, but depending on how tight spacing is, you probably wouldn't need 600

[–] marsza@lemmy.cafe 2 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

I think they should be individually used, very slowly

[–] rbos@lemmy.ca 2 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

It's more cost efficient to use the whole bullet.

[–] vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works 3 points 12 hours ago

Cave Johnson here, why do we not use the whole bullet? Sure you fire a bit of lead but imagine what you could do if you fired the brass and powder as well? So I got the boys down in the lab working on it, they created something called a coilgun. Don't really know or care what that means but you should care, because we are going to give you one to fight the ever growing army of mantis men! Don't worry they don't eat people.

[–] PineRune@lemmy.world 2 points 14 hours ago (2 children)
[–] marsza@lemmy.cafe 4 points 14 hours ago

That’s probably true. I think the most expensive part would be the blade, but you can keep sharpening that – unlike a bullet. I think either would be acceptable, but certainly the guillotine would be more entertaining

[–] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 2 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

The point of the guillotine was to give all citizens an equal, dignified and relatively painless death. Too good for those fucks.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 8 hours ago (1 children)
[–] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 3 points 8 hours ago

Yeah. Before the French Revolution execution via beheading was reserved for nobles, and it was done manually using a weapon rather than via a machine. Meanwhile commoners got to have all the wonderful medieval execution methods like breaking on the wheel and burning at the stake. In the interest of Enlightenment ideals, abandoning medieval barbarism and equality between citizens the Legislative Assembly voted to do away with this system and made it so all French citizens got a execution via beheading like the nobility. However, executioners said that if the lines got too long they might have to rush their work, and a sloppy job would cause undue suffering to the condemned, defeating the point of the whole affair. This is where the clean and efficient guillotine came in. The guillotine as a tool was meant to bring the masses up, not bring the nobility down. That's not what it's associated with nowadays, but it's plenty dignified compared to being hanged, drawn and quartered.

[–] WanderWisley@lemmy.world 5 points 2 hours ago

Stop resisting to the civil unrest that I’m causing! 🫲🍊🫱

[–] griff@lemmings.world 4 points 16 hours ago

a crack team of over-accessorized paunchy masked cowards to set all our neighbors straight, no doubt

[–] Bwaz@lemmy.world 1 points 28 seconds ago

Oh god. The National Goons. Also, what about those Epstein files ( particularly photos and videos)?