The authors caution that their study was a laboratory study, conducted on cells, and larger studies in people are needed.
Ok, nice to know, moving on.
A community to post scientific articles, news, and civil discussion.
rule #1: be kind
The authors caution that their study was a laboratory study, conducted on cells, and larger studies in people are needed.
Ok, nice to know, moving on.
Why not just say, “Popular sugar substitute, erythritol…” in the title?
I mean we both know the answer is for clicks
Add the fucking shit to the headline: Spoiler: it's Erythritol
I always told my buddy who was dieting in college that getting fake sugar sodas isn't the solution, it's to stop drinking soda...
Not even that, find something healthy that scratches the itch. Your body indicates it wants energy (unless your addicted in which case its the microbiome or something), get it some berries or throw them in some water with lemon juice
I've found that a lot of times when I'm craving something sweet, what I actually want is water. It seems my brain associates sweetness (such as from fruit) with hydration. When I can, I'll have some fruit. But when fruit's unavailable, I know I just have to drink more water.
So what brand is this stuff sold under so that I can speedrun that stroke?
In America, it's usually branded as "sugar alcohol", and is found in many sweeteners as an additive.
Here in Denmark I've seen nearly every sugar free ice-cream use it. There's also a number of chewing gums too.
Maybe the ultimate answer will turn out to be JUST EAT LESS FUCKING SUGAR.
What even uses this stuff? I only see Acesulfam-k, Sucralose, Stevia.
Edit: i'm european.
Brand names in the US are Swerve and Truvía. I don't think it gets added to much in junk food factories, but it is available in packets for tea and such.
Lot of things. Here in Spain I have a big box of sweetener little packages that have "STEVIA" la el big but it's 96% eritriol and only 3% stevia.
Here in Denmark I've seen that substance used in gum and sugar free ice-cream.
It's commonly sold mixed with stevia or monk fruit
God damn it, I've been using this a lot. It's almost flavorless except sweet and doesn't take much to sweeten a large amount of water. I've been using the Truvia packets one in a large bottle of water with 1/8 of a teaspoon of crystalized lime or orange ( from a brewer supply co). All the other ones seem to have a chemical aftertaste to me.
Oh well, the second best time to stop is now I suppose.
I fucking knew it, this shit made me feel weird all the time.
If you can, avoid any fake sugar. I love science, but science sugar tricking your brain that something is sweet feels wrong.
Or not. I'm not a nutritionist I don't know anything about anything.
Actually you could be a nutritionist if you call yourself one since it's not a legally protected term. Dietitian is the actual one that is a protected term.
Ah great then hell yeah Im a nutritionist I learnt food brain stuff.
Thats because it is wrong, youve hit the nail on the head. Anything that is sweet activates certain receptors on your tongue, and that stimulates the production of insulin. That insulin is then going to travel your body looking for sugars to break down. Thing is, insulin only breaks down sugars, not artificial sweeteners. So its going to break down sugars elsewhere in your body or leave free insulin in your blood. That fucks you up good and leads to diabetes.
ALL ARTIFICAL SWEETENERS ARE BAD, unless you already have diabetes.
Erythritol makes my entire mouth feel like it's on fire as soon as it touches my tongue. My body did me a favor on this one.
erythritol was always a not so favored ingredient for me due to the weird cooling mouthfeel and GI effects
now if it turns out that allulose is bad for you, I'm going to be SO UPSET.
This seems interesting because they did some research in the actual mechanism that could create a cause-effect relation. Still need to be repeated to justify legal changes but that's a good start.
Much better than these "correlation" studies that say nothing. Like the ones saying "people who doesn't drink any alcohol die sooner that people who drink a cup of wine each day", that's totally faulty for a lot of evident reasons. And until now most artificial sweeteners studies were like that "people who use artificial sweeteners tend to have more health issues", like with the drink is reasonable to assume and consider that people who do such dietary changes is more likely to already have an underlying health issue that they are trying to cope with and it's obviously more in risk that healthy people that doesn't feel the need to control their diet.
As I said this study seems a little more promising as they did research on the actual mechanisms on which the health issues may happen. I hope it gets repeated enough times and, if needed, the product would be banned or properly labeled.
Damn it it's in Celsius. Glad I don't drink it often.
Meh…. It’s a research from the US. Let’s wait till more reputable sources confirm the studies.
fair, but more reputable countries may not have exposed their populations to this poison to begin with
Just another thing to check labels for, none of the drinks I have contain it which is good
Well shit I use it daily for my coffee and home-made milk tea. Reading all this stuff coming to light about sugar substitutes is gonna make me just go back to regular sugar or maybe coconut sugar, and I’ll just control my intake.
You can use Stevia. It's a natural product, zero calories. There is a more expensive option in monk fruit as well. I live on Stevia. It's easily available in groceries and stores, and reasonably priced too.
I do use Stevia. The thing is, all the stevia products I see at the grocery store are laced with erythritol. Does the product you consume exclusively use stevia only?
Interesting thing about most sugar substitutes is they actually kill mouth & gut microbiome.
That seems like an impressively blanket statement when there's literally dozens of sugar substitutes that are all wildly chemically different. Insane that all of them would kill your mouth and gut microbiome even when they often work in fundamentally different ways.
Any evidence for this in Stevia or Monk Fruit?
here's a pretty good meta-analysis I found of various studies of stevia affecting bacteria in vitro and in vivo
the conclusion this paper comes to seems to be "depends on the species and strain of bacteria"
I also don't have any studies, but I am aware of xylitol being used in toothpaste, chewing gum, etc., usually with the "assists in the prevention of tooth decay" type of tagline.
Xylitol is different from erythritol, but both are "sugar alcohols" so further study would be needed
Erithrol is the sweetener derived from monkfruit.
I did a couple searches and I didn't see that mentioned. In my searches I read that monk fruit so like 250x sweeter than sugar, so erythritol is used as a "bulking agent" for monk fruit. So I guess they use it to dilute monk fruit and make it more manageable? Idk, I've been consuming both for quite a while and this is news to me, going to have to learn more about both.
ethrythiol is often mixed with these two, but there are product with solely stevia in it if your interested.
Stevia is often blended with it but only lists in the ingredients.
it's also often blended with dextrose which is SUPER annoying if you're trying to do specialized baking or diets
its either dextrose, or maltodextrin, which are basically sugar with extra steps.