this post was submitted on 22 Jul 2025
229 points (97.5% liked)

Technology

73254 readers
3767 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] just_another_person@lemmy.world 135 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Says the dipshit making the tools to commit fraud easier than ever.

[–] jrs100000@lemmy.world 37 points 4 days ago

Yes. He would really like you and the investors to know how good his fraud device is, but you have to promise not to use it to do crimes. Also, if you are afraid of his fraud device he would like to sell you fraud device protection.

[–] eager_eagle@lemmy.world 80 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (6 children)

Voiceprinting as an identification for wealthy bank clients grew popular more than a decade ago, with customers typically asked to utter a challenge phrase into the phone to access their accounts.

ha, I thought it was just a movie trope

sometimes it feels like banks will use literally anything but recommended practices for multi-factor authentication

[–] Passerby6497@lemmy.world 37 points 4 days ago (2 children)

ha, I thought it was just a movie trope

I wish. My bank has been trying to get me to do that shit for years when I call in.

"YoUr VoIcE iS yOuR pAsSwOrD" - no, my fucking password is my password, and this voice print shit was an obvious security hole from day 1, which is why I always answered that I didn't consent to their bullshit.

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 10 points 4 days ago (1 children)

There's no way that the phone network has enough fidelity to be able to accurately transmit your voice anyway. People who sound similar to you will be able to get in.

[–] Passerby6497@lemmy.world 5 points 4 days ago

Exactly. It always seemed like something that would be broken and used as an excuse that it was my fault they didn't secure their shit

[–] rob_t_firefly@lemmy.world 6 points 4 days ago

I argued with my old bank for ages about this and they continued to insist enabling it on my account was a great idea.

The film Sneakers showed the world why voice ID was a massive security hole and an all-around crappy idea back in 1992, and some idiots are still insisting it's a good idea in 2025 when it's only become astronomically easier to beat than Robert Redford and friends demonstrated.

In my case, I've been doing radio, podcasting, and other voice work for a long time and as a result there are hundreds and hundreds of hours of my voice freely available out there. People can cut and paste me saying "my voice is my passport, verify me" or anything else they like together in Audacity, no AI needed, and fool any telephone-based audio security computer on the planet with it. And explaining this in-person to the branch manager of my former bank elicited nothing more than the blankest expression I'd seen since the pet goldfish I had as a kid.

[–] deafboy@lemmy.world 14 points 4 days ago

When I was complaining about the 10 pieces of paper, each needing a signature and a stamp, just to close one of my bank accounts, the clerk has informed me that some of their procedures has switched to an electronic signature instead. I was pumped! Until he finished the rest of the sentence. By the electronic signature he meant the squigly line, just on a touchscreen.

Some people strive to achieve the pure zen. At that moment I've achieved pure cringe instead.

It's strange though, because that same bank has an excellent API and batch processing available.

[–] curbstickle@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 4 days ago

Nope.

Fuck TD. They enabled this horseshit automatically on my account. Surprise, surprise, it didnt work on my voice, even once.

Supposedly they disabled it three times. Guess what else happened? Someone accessed my damn account, because it was their voice linked to my account.

I'll never have a TD account again. Absolute jackasses in terms of account security, that isn't even the only issue I had with them.

[–] shiroininja@lemmy.world 10 points 4 days ago (1 children)

My bank uses that and personal info, and I have to be calling from a registered number.

[–] Jimmycakes@lemmy.world 11 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Spoofing cell phone numbers is so easy a literal toddler can do it.

[–] shiroininja@lemmy.world 4 points 4 days ago

But can you do it detectably? Because that’s just as easy. This isn’t 95

[–] NotSteve_@piefed.ca 8 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Even ISPs do this where I am. You don't have to utter anything specifically but if they detect your voice being drastically different from what they have on file, they'll lock you out before you even talk to a real person. Not sure how I feel about it tbh

[–] eager_eagle@lemmy.world 9 points 4 days ago (1 children)

what the hell does an ISP want with that, that's nuts

[–] NotSteve_@piefed.ca 5 points 4 days ago

I guess it's mostly for their cell services to avoid SIM jacking and stuff. But I agree

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 1 points 4 days ago

So don't call them if you've got the flu or anything.

[–] seanom@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago

I am guessing they were trying to explain how a large number of banks are using the company PinDrop Security and did a really bad job of it.

[–] ksigley@lemmy.world 58 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (3 children)

This moron is trying to drum up financial panic so he can hawk his stupid human verification device. The Sphere I think ? Or the Orb ? Whatever. It's a fucking camera.

[–] Jimmycakes@lemmy.world 26 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Yeah this guy wants to sell ai security dongles real bad

[–] Rhaedas@fedia.io 11 points 4 days ago (2 children)

plug in AI security device

"Initializing security sweep."

"Security scan finished. All databases wiped clean."

[–] null_dot@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 4 days ago

You missed the part where they lie about dropping the database.

[–] pdxfed@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago

It is going to be a monkeys paw for the fools who use it.

[–] artyom@piefed.social 21 points 4 days ago (1 children)
  1. Create a problem
  2. Sell a solution
[–] echodot@feddit.uk 4 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Yeah he's invented the webcam, I suppose we merely have to be thankful that it isn't another train.

  1. A solution to your problem already exists and has existed for decades
  2. Create a problem
  3. Create an unnecessary ugly overhyped solution to the problem
[–] chaospatterns@lemmy.world 11 points 4 days ago

How about some Yubikeys or smart cards instead of something that requires me to scan my retina and share it with Sam Altman

[–] Rooskie91@discuss.online 34 points 4 days ago (1 children)

"Hey guys, watch out for this torment nexus. It could be pretty scary!"

So are you going to stop building it then?

"...No."

[–] ChaoticEntropy@feddit.uk 9 points 4 days ago

"Did I mention how powerful my products are? Pleeeaaase don't give me money!"

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 29 points 4 days ago (4 children)

Oh he seriously needs to shut up.

He spends his entire time now telling everybody how a product, he is insisting on building, is going to kill us all.

You would have thought that if you were building a doomsday bomb but didn't want to die it'd be pretty easy to just stop building said bomb. But nope everyday he continues making it more and more destructive.

[–] ChairmanMeow@programming.dev 10 points 4 days ago

I mean it's a valid concern. He's also nowhere near the first to voice it. I attended a presentation from a Microsoft exec who explained that Microsoft had already developed very powerful voice mimicking technology, well ahead of anything public at the time. It required only a few seconds of speech before it could fully replicate your voice. But their ethics board or whatever stopped them, due to the massive fraud risks. Nowadays I think they've adapted the tech to voice recognition used in Teams instead.

Of course, MS wasn't the only one working on this and other people have since published these solutions, so the cat's out of the bag now.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] iAvicenna@lemmy.world 19 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Month later

Oh by the way, just conveniently, we have this new product which can take care of this problem for you.

[–] Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works 19 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (2 children)

You'd have to be real ignorant of technology to accept any form of voice or face recognition to gain access to anything - even your phone.

Use a code or a pattern, everyone. This is to protect you from bad cops as much as it is to protect you from bad criminals.

I'm actually really annoyed I can't do two factor on my phone (e.g. Fingerprint + password).

[–] stealth_cookies@lemmy.ca 5 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I had to call into my bank recently and had to listen through what was effectively an ad to sign up for their voice authentication service. All the while I'm thinking, "How dare you implement this crap when you don't even support TOTP or security keys."

Fortunately mine does both. I use Fidelity as my "bank" mostly because they offer Symantec VIP, which is at least a form of TOTP.

[–] simplejack@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago

I'm actually really annoyed I can't do two factor

2 Factor 2 Furious

[–] ICastFist@programming.dev 15 points 4 days ago

Oh no, this tool that EVERY FUCKING ONE said would be very helpful for fraudsters and scammers is going to cause a crisis! WHO COULDA PREDITED IT???????????

Well well well… if it isn’t the consequences of my own actions…

[–] daggermoon@lemmy.world 13 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Does anyone actually think he's a genius? He's clearly a moron of the highest degree.

[–] Ghyste@sh.itjust.works 3 points 3 days ago

Failing upwards.

[–] Sirdubdee@lemmy.world 12 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I followed a different post and replaced AI with cocaine, and it still works in this context.

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 3 points 4 days ago

Yes it's rather like Pablo Escobar going "don't do drugs kids".

[–] vala@lemmy.world 7 points 3 days ago

He wants AI to become strictly regulated so no one can catch up to his stagnating bullshit engine.

[–] Clepsydrae@lemmy.world 6 points 4 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

I am the system administrator. My voice is my ~~password~~ passport. Verify me.

[–] frostysauce@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)
[–] Clepsydrae@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago

Been way too long since I played that game. Amusingly, it's not easy to get running on Linux (last time I checked, at least)

[–] thatradomguy@lemmy.world 3 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Does anyone by chance have tips for someone wanting to sound like Mark Hamil Joker via AI? No particular reason...

[–] BreadstickNinja@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago

I mean, download xtts2 and feed a six-second clip of Mark Hamill's voice into it. Altman isn't wrong that it's extremely easy these days and a massive security hole.

[–] rob_t_firefly@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago

What Mark Hamill Joker fan doesn't have their own Mark Hamill Joker impression? Screw AI, just do the voice like we've all been doing for 30+ years.

[–] dinckelman@lemmy.world 3 points 4 days ago

I find it really fascinating, how these people think everything is a complete non-issue, unless money is involved. The society can fuck itself, but if their bank account is at risk, then it's scorched earth time

[–] resipsaloquitur@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago

Yeah, Sam, we know.

[–] vane@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

I am rich so write what I said.

load more comments
view more: next ›