this post was submitted on 16 Jul 2025
501 points (98.3% liked)

News

31014 readers
3813 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The truck that was supposed to revolutionize everything is flopping fast.

The hype is dead. The Tesla Cybertruck, once billed as the future of electric vehicles, is now looking like a commercial bust.

In the second quarter of 2025, Tesla sold just 4,306 Cybertrucks, down a staggering 50.8% from the 8,755 units it delivered during the same period last year, according to new data from Kelley Blue Book. This plunge is a signal that America’s most hyped truck may already be out of gas.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Headofthebored@lemmy.world 155 points 1 day ago (5 children)

I like how people don't hate it because its electric, they hate it because it's objectively terrible. Maybe if it didn't stink like a dead nazi, people would buy it.

[–] jhymesba@lemmy.world 61 points 1 day ago (2 children)

It's ugly, and it looks like it jumped off the screen from the Cyberpunk 2077 world. It's poorly built and ineffective at the job it was designed to do. And then Elon did his thing, and now it's irrevocably tied to a dead Mid-20th Century ideology that the entire world fought to dismantle. I'm glad it's falling by the wayside. An object lesson -- don't build stupidly engineered items, and don't tout murderous ideologies that get a majority of the world against you.

[–] treesquid@lemmy.world 70 points 1 day ago (2 children)

It doesn't look like it came out of Cyberpunk, literally every vehicle in that game looks way cooler and more advanced. The Cybertruck looks like it came from a "futuristic" wireframe video game from 1985. It's obviously trying to play off DeLorean vibes, it's made as nostalgia for a 40-year old vision of a future that never came. It's like if someone made a 50s rocket-punk styled car in 1990, it's just a botched anachronistic mess, more past than future.

[–] jagermo@feddit.org 19 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Its from the movie Freejack, trashy sci fi action flick from 1992, Mick Jagger drives something like it

collapsed inline media

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 21 points 1 day ago (2 children)

that looks more like an APC.

[–] NigelFrobisher@aussie.zone 25 points 1 day ago

IIRC it’s a real amphibious APC used by the Royal Marines painted red.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] sundray@lemmus.org 36 points 1 day ago (8 children)

It’s ugly

I agree completely. I mean back in the 80's they were envisioning cool stuff like this:

collapsed inline media

... and instead Telsa decided to put out something that looks like some guy tried to turn his shed into a car.

[–] WanderingThoughts@europe.pub 19 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

Even amateur designers can start from the cyber truck design and make something a lot better with a few tweaks. The current design is just a great visualization of what happens when the boss purposefully ignores any suggestion and criticism from the employees. I mean, this not only happens with cars. There are many projects going that way. This is just a very visual high level example.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 20 points 1 day ago (2 children)

its basically a giant metal coffin, which is also a charcuterie machine.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] frog_brawler@lemmy.world 129 points 1 day ago (3 children)

But almost six years later, the truck’s surreal design, awkward size, high price, and late delivery have turned it into a niche curiosity, not a mass-market hit.

How the fuck do you write an article about the failed Cybertruck and not acknowledge Elon’s political bullshit impacting Tesla sales?!?

Dishonest shit.

[–] girsaysdoom@sh.itjust.works 31 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Biggest takeaway; the media is still in denial.

[–] Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world 32 points 1 day ago (3 children)

The media is still ~~in denial~~ receiving money from the right.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Linkalee@sh.itjust.works 18 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Early reviews raised red flags over software glitches, poor fit and finish, and disappointing range for a vehicle of its size.

That's the only sentence acknowledging the MANY mechanical failures, too.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Hugin@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

Eh. Even if Musk still had his Iron Man in real life image the cyber truck would still be a complete failure.

Saying it's a shitty car and a failure by only looking at it as a car seems like good journalism. This isn't a good product that failed because people don't like Musk anymore.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] arc99@lemmy.world 63 points 1 day ago (25 children)

I think Musk drew this thing on the back of an envelope and forced it through to production against the protests and objections of everybody in Tesla. It sucks as a truck, it sucks as an EV, it costs way too much money, it's so dangerous that it is banned in most of the world, it's impractical, costly to repair, uninsurable and it falls to bits. It's no wonder the thing failed.

load more comments (25 replies)
[–] 6stringringer@lemmy.zip 39 points 1 day ago (1 children)

They go from Zero to 1939 faster than one can ask Grok what time it is.

[–] Vanilla_PuddinFudge@infosec.pub 20 points 1 day ago (1 children)

9:00am

Hey, Grok, what time is it?

NEIN

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 34 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I don't think anyone credible sincerely thought the cyber truck was going to do well

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] CmdrShepard49@sh.itjust.works 34 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Its a modern day DMC DeLorean which ironically also had a raw stainless steel body. Hopefully it tanks the company just like the DeLorean did.

I don't think the DeLorean reference is apt. That company was headed by a man who saw himself as a visionary, liked to highlight his middle initial "Z," and had a drug addiction. No connection whatsoever.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 39 points 1 day ago (7 children)

Delorean built his cars in Northern Ireland during the Troubles while also smuggling drugs to try to keep the company solvent, and he still managed to produce a better vehicle than Musk did. At least Delorean managed to pick a stainless steel alloy that was actually stainless!

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] orbituary@lemmy.dbzer0.com 24 points 1 day ago

At least DeLorean went out for something cool: smuggling cocaine in the vehicles.

[–] morphballganon@lemmy.world 20 points 1 day ago

The DeLorean looked WAY cooler.

[–] Noite_Etion@lemmy.world 33 points 1 day ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] 6stringringer@lemmy.zip 31 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

I wonder, when they hit 88 Mph, does one transport back in time to apartheid South Africa?

[–] Apocalypteroid@lemmy.world 17 points 1 day ago (1 children)

If they go faster than 60 the wheels fall off

[–] tehn00bi@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago (6 children)

It’s a fair question. The whole 88 mph thing from back to the future was a joke because no one thought a delorian could go that fast.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works 26 points 1 day ago

I flip them off now. I'm doing my part!

collapsed inline mediaA, meme from starship troopers with the caption I'm doing my part

Go Nazi Go Bust

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 24 points 1 day ago (6 children)

I mean at least the Segway was built well

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] DarkFuture@lemmy.world 23 points 1 day ago

Driving a Cybercuck is a great way to tell society you're the village idiot.

[–] ThunderComplex@lemmy.today 19 points 1 day ago (5 children)

I feel like 4306 units sold in one quarter is still quite a lot all things considered.

[–] ToastedRavioli@midwest.social 16 points 1 day ago (2 children)

And only 4,200 of them will have panels falling off by the end of next quarter

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] burgerpocalyse@lemmy.world 16 points 1 day ago (1 children)

me driving my shitbox around and I see a cybertruck

collapsed inline media

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 15 points 1 day ago

it was never the future, it was only meant to hype of the stocks so he can get that 56bn payout in '23, it just took longer than expected.

[–] CanadaRocks@piefed.ca 14 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

The concept was quirky but it had a ton of hype. It wasn't helped by the fact that it has some fairly noticeable flaws, one being panels that are glued on and have been known to fall off. And headlights that are placed so close to the front bumper that any buildup of snow blocks them. Not smart design.

Teslastans hyped the fact that there were "2 million preorders" which was supposedly because of the mass appeal of the CT. Turns out once the novelty wore off, people just said 'meh, Id rather have a more normal truck for doing truck things' which is why the Rivian is still selling ok, the Ford Lightning is limping along and the Sliverado EV is actually a range champ with real world reports of over 800 km range that can actually tow a trailer for more than three blocks before needing a recharge.

[–] GaMEChld@lemmy.world 14 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Every time I see one I burst out laughing, they look so fucking stupid!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] tacosanonymous@mander.xyz 11 points 1 day ago

That’s still too many.

load more comments
view more: next ›