this post was submitted on 09 Jul 2025
1236 points (99.6% liked)

Greentext

6687 readers
1444 users here now

This is a place to share greentexts and witness the confounding life of Anon. If you're new to the Greentext community, think of it as a sort of zoo with Anon as the main attraction.

Be warned:

If you find yourself getting angry (or god forbid, agreeing) with something Anon has said, you might be doing it wrong.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Sciaphobia@sh.itjust.works 199 points 1 day ago (6 children)

Open browser

Browser demands updates

All extensions update simultaneously. Each opens its own tab to proudly announce bug fixes for bugs you never noticed.

Close ten tabs you didn’t open

Miss one. It autoplays a video ad.

Type in search bar. Autocomplete offers suggestions that are 5 years old, NSFW, or both.

Search for a product. Top results: Ads. Sidebar: Ads. Bottom: Ads. An actual organic result is wedged between an ad and a newsletter signup modal.

Click real-looking result. Redirected to a shady dropshipper site.

Back button doesn't work. It reloads the same scam page five times. You lose the original tab somewhere in a pile of redirects.

Click Amazon link. It’s a new seller with the business name “USB_Cable_Amazon_Partner_Official.” 13,000 reviews. All 5 stars.

Try to read reviews. Most are for the wrong product. Many are AI-generated gibberish. The rest complain about shipping.

Add to cart. You are not logged in.

Log in.

CAPTCHA challenge: Pick all the traffic lights. Traffic lights are 1 pixel wide. One is technically a lamppost. Verification failed.

2 factor authentication push. By the time you get the authenticator open, the session expired. Start over.

Try to close browser. Are you sure you want to close 37 tabs?”

Yes. It crashes.

Reopens all 37 tabs next launch.

Give up and use your phone

4 popups, fingerprint required, and every link jumps when the page loads because of delayed ad banners.

App store ad appears for the site you’re already on

Clicking "x" opens the ad anyway.

You close the phone browser

Go outside

Get a push notification: “You left items in your cart.”

[–] spankmonkey@lemmy.world 64 points 1 day ago

This should be etched into gold as a perfect description of life in 2025.

[–] ch00f@lemmy.world 42 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

I think it's interesting that in 2005, the internet had a ton of popups and scammy ads that told you "you just won a free iPod!" and everyone knew that was a thing. There was even a gag about it in Scary Movie 3 (2003):

collapsed inline media

Yet you don't hear people complain about that as much today. It's like so much of the internet has been cordoned off into walled gardens that most users don't see pages out in the open.

[–] Sergio@slrpnk.net 13 points 1 day ago

I read an interesting article about that: https://thehistoryoftheweb.com/ads/

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] pennomi@lemmy.world 36 points 1 day ago (1 children)

You missed scroll hijacking because reinventing how things move on the screen is important for some reason?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Buddahriffic@lemmy.world 20 points 1 day ago (4 children)

One trick for the "back button doesn't work" is to right click it and select the page you want to go back to from that list.

Though I do wish back buttons worked on clicks rather than loads or anything a site can override with javascript. I hate the sites that treat scrolling to the next article as a new page. It trains me to not scroll to the next one, even if it looks interesting, because they fuck with my browser like that (even though I can work around it, fuck them for the attempt).

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] mrgoosmoos@lemmy.ca 13 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

I once responded to one of those "you have items in your cart" emails that I received like a mere half hour after finishing browsing with a "fuck off", and a short while later somebody responded and said some things and ended with "same to you too"

I immediately replied and said oh wow a real person replied, don't take it personally, it was directed at the automatic message.

they started berating me and telling me that I should just unsubscribe if I don't want the emails (that I never fucking subscribed to in the first place???), and then deleted my account and banned me from the store, it seems. I tried to buy something over half a year later, but it was declined without reason, and support told me it was "flagged for fraud" and didn't elaborate

[–] reptar@lemmy.world 8 points 17 hours ago

Oh fuck them

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] A_Union_of_Kobolds@lemmy.world 84 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Honestly like 2/3 of this is handled by the right Firefox plugins but that JavaScript Shuffle bullshit drives me INSANE

MY PHONE IS AN HTML ONLY ZONE

[–] decipher_jeanne@lemmy.blahaj.zone 23 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yeah.... I tried that for a while. You don't go very far on modern internet with JS disabled

Use noscript and whitelist urls as needed. Pages that dont need javascript dont get to use it, and for pages that do need it, you can make sure it only runs exactly what it needs to.

[–] Thorry84@feddit.nl 83 points 1 day ago (4 children)

And everything is SO FUCKING SLOW. I swear my old Celeron 300A at 500mhz running Windows 98 and SUSE Linux was super responsive. Everything you clicked just responded right away, everything felt smooth and snappy. Chatting with people over the internet using ICQ or MSN was basically instant, all the windows opened instantly, typing had zero latency and sending messages was instant.

My current Ryzen 5950X is not only a billion times faster, it also has 16 times the number of cores. I have hundreds of times the RAM as I had HDD capacity on that old system. Yet everything is slower, typing has latency, starting up Teams takes 5 minutes. Doing anything is slow, everything has latency and you need to wait for things to finish loading and rendering unless you want everything to mess up and you'd have to wait even more.

[–] nickhammes@lemmy.world 50 points 1 day ago (2 children)

In the 90s, a lot of programmers spent a lot of time carefully optimizing everything, on the theory that every CPU cycle counted. And in the decades since, it's gotten easier than ever to write software, but the craft of writing great software has stalled compared to the ease of writing mediocre software. "Why shouldn't we block on a call to a remote service? Computers are so fast these days"

[–] frezik@lemmy.blahaj.zone 22 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The flip side of that is entire classes of bugs being removed from modern software.

The differences are primarily languages. A GUI in the 90s was likely programmed with C/C++. Increasingly, it's now done in languages that have complex runtime environments like dotnet, or what is effectively a browser tab written with browser languages.

Those C/C++ programs almost always had buffer overflows. Which were taken off of the OWASP Top 10 back in 2007, meaning the industry no longer considers it a primary threat. This should be considered a huge success. Related issues, like dynamic memory mismanagement, are also almost gone.

There are ways to take care of buffer overflows without languages in complex managed runtimes, such as what Go and Rust do. You can have the compiler produce ASM that does array bounds checking every time while only being a smidge slower than C/C++. With SSDs all but removing the excuse that disk IO is the limiting factor, this is increasingly the way to go.

The industry had good reasons to use complex runtimes, though some of the reasons are now changing.

Oh, and look at what old games did to optimize things, too. The Minus World glitch in Super Mario Bros--rooted in uninitialized values of a data structure that needed to be a consistent shape--would be unlikely to happen if it were written in Python, and almost certainly wouldn't happen in Rust. Optimizations tend to make bugs all their own.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)

Oh my fuck, my work has a website and I hate it. There are multiple fields to fill out on a page, and every time you fill one field, the entire page automatically refreshes. I can’t just tab from field to field and fill things out - I have to fill out a field, wait for the refresh, click in the next field, fill it out, wait for the refresh, click in the next field…. until I’m done.

Next, for some reason everything is a floating window and there is no scroll outside of it. Which means that if I click the page wrong, the floating window moves, and I can’t move it back. I lose all progress because the only way to fix it is to refresh the site.

Then there’s the speed. At the end of the day, when everyone is using this site, it gets extremely slow. You’d think this would be a predictable issue that the company could be proactive about, yet every day, right when we’re itching the most to go home, every one of us experiences the dreaded lag. I hadn’t seen lag this bad since I played Sims 2 on an old computer.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 75 points 1 day ago (1 children)

And don't even get me started on payment.

Based Brazil has pix: select payment method, scan qr code with your bank app, pay.

[–] Quik@infosec.pub 66 points 1 day ago (1 children)

You obviously also need an account for everything. This requirement is only communicated at checkout.

[–] relativestranger@feddit.nl 34 points 1 day ago (3 children)

i always look for the 'guest' checkout option. some merchants have it, and i'll choose them over somewhere like azn if the price is reasonably close.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] green_copper@kbin.earth 60 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The second last point is the most enraging to me. Either show me a loading overlay or don't move the items a single pixel!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works 53 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Sad part about this is it's not comic hyperbole. It's just literally an average online experience.

[–] tungsten5@lemmy.zip 21 points 16 hours ago (5 children)

I came here to say this. Often times the pop ups are so bad that I just leave the site. Its almost never worth it

[–] bob_lemon@feddit.org 8 points 13 hours ago

Amazon redirecting you to the front page after you decline cookies is just amazingly stupid design.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] the_wiz@feddit.org 37 points 17 hours ago (3 children)

This is the reason why I had a long and bloody fight regarding the homepage of the company I work at. And I won.

Management wanted a new homepage, marketing wanted the homepage to be - and this is a citation - "Emotional!!! And we want ENGAGEMENT!!!" (For context: We are building industrial machinery).

Marketing got an external offer (behind my back) and a mockup of the homepage based on React with animations and an dynamic background which turned every PC we looked at it with into a space heater. And they wanted to spend > 15 k € on it.

I - as something yanks would call a CTO - said no.

Everything turned quiet "Emotional!!!" for a couple of months, but in the end I won with the argument that we are building FUCKING BORING INDUSTRIAL MACHINERY, our costumers seldom change and if so, they are also from some big boring industrial company who already know us because we are in this business since Ugh, the first CEO chiseled the first iteration of our landmark product with a flintstone in 15000 BC.

The rebuild of the homepage resulted in something that is quiet nice looking... but that can also work perfectly fine in fucking DILLO!

[–] Tinidril@midwest.social 13 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago)

Way back in 2001 when Adobe flash was the exciting new thing on the web, I was the network/firewall admin for the data-center hosting the company website. I didn't get to argue about the site itself, since they had Microsoft in to do that. I did win the argument against the Microsoft engineers wanting to put the site outside the firewall for "performance". Needless to say my ass was on the line if performance was impacted.

Sure enough, the big launch day arrives, the Superbowl adds run, and the complaints all start coming in about how terribly the site was performing. They beat the hell out of it in the lab, so they knew with absolute certainty that the firewall was to blame. Lots of higher-ups were suddenly aware that I existed, which is never a good thing for a network admin.

I dove into troubleshooting and had my answer in less than ten minutes. The front page was a monstrosity made entirely of flash that displayed nothing until the entire page loaded - graphics and all. That worked well enough on a high speed network but, back in 2001, most people at home were on dialup. A little quick math on the size of the download had it taking over 40 seconds to just see the front page.

The site got a really rapid rewrite, and I was off the hook.

[–] deathbird@mander.xyz 11 points 17 hours ago

"Works fine in Dillo" is a golden endorsement.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Beryl@jlai.lu 37 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Also the thing you're actually looking for will be on the 3rd result page, buried under a dozen vaguely related items that are the site ''recommendation '' even though you typed the exact reference of the thing you were looking for.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 30 points 1 day ago

This is 100% accurate.

[–] happydoors@lemmy.world 29 points 1 day ago (6 children)

Yeah, idk. 2005 internet sucked in a lot of ways too. Nostalgia doing a lot of work here

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] vivalapivo@lemmy.today 24 points 13 hours ago

Don't toss your monitor, you will need to go to the online store in order to get a new one

[–] Gowron_Howard@lemmy.world 23 points 1 day ago (3 children)

UX my ass. These “improvements” only hinder the user.

[–] currycourier@lemmy.world 18 points 1 day ago

I suppose they never specified it was supposed to be a good user experience?

[–] Samskara@sh.itjust.works 17 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The X stands for eXploitation.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago

Our target audience is people with cognitive disabilities who still have access to a credit card.

[–] axEl7fB5@lemmy.cafe 17 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago) (1 children)
  • 2025
  • Go to any website
  • uBlock Origin
  • No ads and cookie banners
  • Some AI chat assistant named Jill on the bottom right corner
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] sunglocto@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

Use Librewolf + Ublock origin with cookie popups filter turned on and medium mode on when needed.

[–] VerilyFemme@lemmy.blahaj.zone 12 points 1 day ago

Yeah, Librewolf is kinda the best web browser. I still need to use Firefox for some things that just have to be invasive, like I think my bank needs the browser to be a little less locked down, but man I love just browsing the web and only seeing what I want to see.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] gibmiser@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It used to be that the ads, viruses and tracking were on the web pages, but now we are so blessed that they are built into our browsers and operating systems! Talk about optimization!

load more comments (1 replies)

it is bad enough on some websites to make me wish I could just use a mail catalog thing

[–] hanrahan@slrpnk.net 10 points 14 hours ago

We are all Anon now

[–] mortalblade@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago) (1 children)

Theres a webpage someone made thats like a visual example of this but I forgot what it's called (maybe "I look at a webpage in 20XX" ) Anyone know it ?

[–] SunshineJogger@feddit.org 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] BubblyRomeo@kbin.earth 8 points 1 day ago

Too relatable

[–] morphballganon@lemmy.world 7 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Was the cookies popup really 3 years ago already?

[–] LodeMike@lemmy.today 10 points 21 hours ago

They've been around for over half a decade.

[–] Jackcooper@lemmy.world 7 points 18 hours ago (7 children)

Missed the part where

Shipping is 6.95 Close tab Sigh, open amazon

[–] sykaster@feddit.nl 15 points 14 hours ago

I will pay 6.95 to not order from Amaozn, fuck 'em

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›