this post was submitted on 26 Jun 2025
1 points (100.0% liked)

Science Memes

16726 readers
101 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] rumba@lemmy.zip 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

OMG, I asked copilot to read the text and fix it to 168 degrees F.

I expected it to give me text and for it to be horrible,

what It did was so much worse and so must more impressive.

collapsed inline media

[–] Itdidnttrickledown@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago

His number are off due to the idea that chicken is cooked at 400F. Yikes!

Hi there and welcome back to another episode of Bitch Slap Kitchen, where we cook food like it owes us money. Today we're making some delicious backhand chicken.

Suspend a whole chicken in midair form some string or something, haul back, and swing at about mach 5, a little less. You're probably not going to have any intact glass anywhere in your house and you'll probably set off some car alarms in the shopping district but you'll have a table ready main course in milliseconds.

[–] over_clox@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago (2 children)

How fast does it cook in a vacuum?

[–] zedgeist@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago

I'd suspect it doesn't cook so much as, y'know, explode and dessicate

[–] TheFogan@programming.dev 0 points 2 months ago

to my knowledge these calculations pretty much have to be assuming a vacuum. IE there's no mention of heat loss between slaps. which would be inevitable as 23k instant slaps, would take considerable time.

[–] ThePantser@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

How many wanks to choke my chicken?

[–] zedgeist@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I don't really know you, but your ex told me three strokes, tops

[–] sunoc@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 months ago (2 children)

A guy on YT actually tried it experimentally a few years ago (how many slaps, not how fast one slap); and it works to some degree! The main problem becomes to make a slapping machine that can survive long enough:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LHFhnnTWMgI&pp=ygURc2xhcCBjb29rIGNoaWNrZW7SBwkJzgkBhyohjO8%3D

[–] zedgeist@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago (2 children)

YouTube is truly a wonder of stupidity. Sometimes in good ways

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] tigeruppercut@lemmy.zip 0 points 2 months ago

He also did a turkey a couple years after that for "slapsgiving"

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ikiwW9VA9hk

[–] lemmie689@lemmy.sdf.org 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] laserwash2000@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

The chicken has to exceed the boiling point of water for it to be cooked? Unless we’re making chicken caramels, I don’t think so.

[–] zedgeist@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)

That 205C would just be the surface temperature of the chicken, not the average. Note that the calculation doesn't take into account the volume or radius

EDIT: No, I'm wrong. The calculation is for boiling the whole chicken. Who was this written by, a Brit?

[–] laserwash2000@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Are you sure? The numbers in the tweet talk about total mass and heat capacity. So I think that means the entire bulk has that average temperature.

[–] zedgeist@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] laserwash2000@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

One thing’s for sure: a chicken slapped at 3726 mph won’t be very tasty. Or look too good.

[–] zedgeist@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

What, you don't like ~~vaporized~~ ionized poultry?

[–] lvxferre@mander.xyz 0 points 2 months ago

Who was this written by, a Brit?

Nope. Likely an American.

When cooking, people in general like to use round numbers, like "200°C", since a difference of 5°C in oven temperature is not a big deal.

And yet they went with some oddly specific 205°C. That only makes sense if they're used to Fahrenheit, eyeballed a round value (like 400°F), converted it into Celsius (204.4°C), and then rounded it up to discard the decimal.

I'm also going to say they're completely clueless when it comes to cooking - 200°C is the oven temperature. The chicken itself reaches a far lower temperature, in the 70~80°C range. By the time the chicken reached 200°C, it's already dry and close to catching fire. (The self-ignition temperature for biological stuff is typically between 200°C and 250°C.)

[–] Balthazar@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago

Excellent, physics in service of humanity!

[–] Sophocles@infosec.pub 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Bro really wanted his chicken well done at 400°F

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago (3 children)

Naw, that’s burnt.

Maillard reaction where things brown starts at 350f.

More than 165/175 in the center and that’s dried out.

[–] Graphy@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

If you spatchcock your bird then you’ve only gotta slap your cock to about 150°F at the thickest part of breast

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

naturally. Best to slow it down and keep it juicy, too. I like smoking them at about 200 f, it's perfection.

also... way to make spatchcocking sound even dirtier than it is. the no cooks here are probably thinking it's some sort of sex act and the rest of us are wondering if it's not also some sort of sex act.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Klear@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago

The mallard reaction is only relevant when cooking duck.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Courantdair@jlai.lu 0 points 2 months ago (2 children)

At this point we have to consider the ambient temperature as well, as the chicken will slightly cool between two slaps once it exceeds it

[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago

Assume the chicken is spherical an in vacuum.

[–] Saleh@feddit.org 0 points 2 months ago

I think we should put more consideration into the fact that slapping the chicken this much will dissipate a lot of energy into deforming the chicken.

[–] sm1dger@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago (4 children)

Typical physicist, ignoring enthalpy of phase changes. Starting from 1C defrosted makes a huge difference from 0C as the melting takes up a ton more energy/slaps. Their underslapped chicken would give you salmonella

[–] zedgeist@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago
[–] ryedaft@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

And the phase change from uncooked to cooked.

[–] marius@feddit.org 0 points 2 months ago

Where do I find cooked in the phase diagram?

[–] thebestaquaman@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Also completely neglecting that not all the energy in a slap will be transferred to thermal energy in the chicken.

[–] Balthazar@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago

Assume a spherical chicken...

[–] untorquer@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

They haven't considered rate of slap. Significant heat transfer to environment even at 10 slaps per second.

They're also assuming sea level standard atmospheric conditions. You may need to reduce rate of slap at altitude.

[–] marius@feddit.org 0 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Also only about half the heat goes into the chicken and the other half into the hand used for slapping

[–] untorquer@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago

I believe we're well on our way to developing the worlds first slap coefficient.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Stillwater@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 months ago

I think they did this on mythbusters

[–] observantTrapezium@lemmy.ca 0 points 2 months ago (3 children)
[–] pigup@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Common sense and physicists are common enemies

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] mexicancartel@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 2 months ago (3 children)

Well otherwise it has to stay at some 100 degrees for quite a long time to consider it cooked

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] kameecoding@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago

Maybe they like their chicken fucking black

[–] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

But how do you get the chicken back from the stratosphere once you've slapped it that fast?

[–] Klear@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago (2 children)

You start in the stratosphere and slap it down towards the Earth.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›