this post was submitted on 18 Mar 2025
85 points (96.7% liked)

Ask Lemmy

30035 readers
1430 users here now

A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions


Rules: (interactive)


1) Be nice and; have funDoxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them


2) All posts must end with a '?'This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?


3) No spamPlease do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.


4) NSFW is okay, within reasonJust remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either !asklemmyafterdark@lemmy.world or !asklemmynsfw@lemmynsfw.com. NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].


5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions. If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email info@lemmy.world. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.


6) No US Politics.
Please don't post about current US Politics. If you need to do this, try !politicaldiscussion@lemmy.world or !askusa@discuss.online


Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.

Partnered Communities:

Tech Support

No Stupid Questions

You Should Know

Reddit

Jokes

Ask Ouija


Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

What is your line in the sand?

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] FelixCress@lemmy.world 105 points 6 hours ago (2 children)

No. And I haven't for a while now. Looking at your electoral system (electoral college, gerrymandering etc.), it probably never was but it was never as obvious as it is now.

[–] tiredofsametab@fedia.io 31 points 6 hours ago

I grew up in the US and have lived outside it for 10 years now. I would agree with this. Voting and representation have never been total and is definitely less available for many groups. Further things are being stripped away.

[–] Gradually_Adjusting@lemmy.world 15 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

Yeah. My wake-up call was quite early in life, when SCOTUS handed the election to GWB. If I was born a generation earlier I'd have called it with Watergate. If I was an ancestor currently dead, I would have called it around the time an assassin put the presidency in the hands of the opposite party, and a drunk asshole subsequently decided reconstruction efforts should fail. Or possibly just prior, when we somehow decided not to hang every man Jack of the confederacy for treason.

Edit: an earlier still version of me would have overseen the death of a culture brought on by poxy mad white religious extremists, and laughed ruefully to hear that centuries later the utter bastardy continues unchanged.

[–] DasFaultier@sh.itjust.works 75 points 6 hours ago

See, as a German, when I see a country go down the same route as the Weimar Republic after handing over the power to the Nazi party, I think it's just very obvious. Hitler took some two months to completely destroy democracy, and the US are juuust in the middle of that. History doesn't repeat, but sometimes it rhymes, and the similarities are just remarkable.

So yeah, I guess that would be a big fat trench in the sand.

[–] JacksonLamb@lemmy.world 36 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

still consider

It has only two political parties, and a weird system where all votes are not equal and the actual vote majority doesn't always win.

It has frequently had multiple people from the same families running for office, and only wealthy people have a shot. Corporations get to lobby for laws in their favour.

It also spies on its own citizens, holds people indefinitely without trial, has a huge prison population, a militarized police with a high homicide rate, and is the only western nation with the death penalty.

Trump and Musk are laying bare how fragile the veneer of "democracy" really is in that country.

[–] Brownandoffended@lemm.ee 36 points 6 hours ago

A struggling democracy, in the beginning of an Orban/Hungary-like overtake of the country.

Its possible to revert, but you seem to have atleast a 1/3 of the country that would walk down a straight up facist line willingly and happily do so.

You need to fix your shit america.

[–] zonnewin@feddit.nl 33 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

I consider it an autocratic regime with strong fascist characteristics.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] SlopppyEngineer@lemmy.world 30 points 5 hours ago

Line in the sand? Going after political opponents. Censoring information. Dismantling media. Abandoning rule of law. Business and government mixing too much.

USA is speed running these.

[–] char_stats@lemm.ee 18 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

I consider it a faux democracy. It still has the semblance of one, with people voting, believing they matter and that they have actual free speech, but the masses are being, increasingly less subtly, controlled by media corporations and rendered incapable of critical, independent thinking by an ever decreasing quality of education.

Don't be fooled though! This isn't happening in the US alone. It is widespread all over the globe. The US is simply doing it in a smarter, more cunning way, while leading the wealthy 1% in other countries by example.

[–] TeaWalker@lemm.ee 17 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Am Dutch. I have considered the US an incomplete democracy since I learned about voting in school. It’s not one person one vote, which to me is crucial for a democracy. The US right now is still a nation of laws, but democracy is sharply in decline. The voter-roll issues and Gerrymandering come to mind immediately. Not to mention the fact that guaranteed access to polls has been pulled by the courts. Which is insane to me.

[–] drmoose@lemmy.world 5 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Also president having so much power was clearly never democratic to begin with as we can see it all play out now.

[–] RupeThereItIs@lemmy.world 5 points 2 hours ago

The power of the president did not start out like this. Congress kept giving their power to the executive for political reasons.

It happened over centuries.

[–] coaxil@lemm.ee 17 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

Not at all, you are just an autocracy now but don't fully realise it, and as the other commentator had said, not even really a good democracy in the loosest of terms before this entire mess going on ATM!

[–] Mvlad88@lemmy.world 13 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

How can you be a democracy if you have only two political parties?

[–] pastermil@sh.itjust.works 4 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

With one not giving a fuck, and the other severely fractured due to conflicting ideals none the less

[–] sem@lemmy.ml 12 points 6 hours ago

The answer depends of the reference point. I was born in Russia (I'm living abroad from 2022) and compared to the putin's dictatorship US is a democracy. You guys still have a freedom of speech, not fake opposition to Trump and independent courts. From the other side, most of the countries are democracies if compared to Russia..

[–] Greg@lemmy.ca 11 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

No but this isn't recent. My line in the sand was Russian interference in the 2016 US election that came to light in 2018.

collapsed inline media

*United States Democracy Index

[–] Propheticus@lemmy.zip 11 points 5 hours ago

Yes, but a bad example of one very quickly heading towards autocracy. Some characteristics like screwing up your own economy and blaming 'the foreigners' rings a distant bell.

[–] Intergalactic@lemmy.world 10 points 4 hours ago (4 children)

Absolutely not. A country where two parties are the only two viable electoral options, is absolutely not a democracy. Doesn’t mean I’ll stop my membership for the PSL.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] XTL@sopuli.xyz 10 points 2 hours ago (4 children)

Absolutely not. A two party system was barely nominally a form of democracy. Current one quacks like a dictatorship and walks like a dictatorship. They might hold a fake election one day like many of those do, but still no.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] tortina_original@lemmy.world 10 points 3 hours ago

It was never a democracy.

[–] FaceDeer@fedia.io 9 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Unfortunately, it's still a democracy. The electorate wanted what's now going on. That could rapidly change at this point, but for now not yet.

[–] MoonManKipper@lemmy.world 5 points 5 hours ago (4 children)

Democracy is a sliding scale and the US is still on it. Could the people choose something different without resorting to violent revolution and protest? Yes

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] sinnsykfinbart@lemmy.world 9 points 4 hours ago

I really never did, not a well functioning at least. They've practiced voter repression for decades, and then they had fun testing how low they could go after 9/11, doing a lot of unlawful shit, going after citizens who spoke out against their policies and wars.

[–] sasquash@sopuli.xyz 8 points 5 hours ago

Maybe a flawed democracy at best and it's getting worse every day. At least on federal level, I don't much about states politics. Not really an expert but democracy can't really work that well if you are stuck in a two party system. Having more choice would sure help against populists and autocrats.

[–] sirico@feddit.uk 8 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

The next election will tell, my tin hat is on Puting the US into a situation where an election can't be held so they can have a third term.

[–] Kissaki@feddit.org 5 points 3 hours ago

I'm not sure even with a successful election and it going to the democrats we'll be able to tell. At least from today's view. It will largely depend on how institutions and the justice/court system can hold out against the current administration right now and during this phase.

I feel like they may have already created damage that won't be cleared just from one election or one election period's fixups.

At the same time, hopefully, this is the wake-up call for opposition and a transformation one way or another. It's plainly obvious what is happening now, and I am hoping opposition will become more apparent and prevalent because of it. Not just in citizens, but institutions too.

[–] esc27@lemmy.world 7 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

If you want to be pedantic, the US is not a democracy in much the same way Linux is not an operating system...

Otherwise, of course it is. It just had a major election last year. The vast majority of citizens were eligible to vote, multiple people were on the ballot. The ones with the most votes won.

That's not to say it doesn't have flaws. Gerrymandering in particular. But even that can be overcome if people actually bother to vote...

Of course the next election may be different...

[–] Meron35@lemmy.world 7 points 5 hours ago

Not for a long time. The Economist Democracy Index demoted the US to a "flawed democracy" since 2016, where it has been ever since.

Democracy index, 2024 - https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/democracy-index-eiu

[–] Monkyhands@feddit.dk 7 points 6 hours ago

No. I agree with the comment about the electoral system and gerrymandering as fundamental issues. And the current administration does not respect the judiciary branch, that much is clear, and their actions are completely undermining the supposed divisions of power, without which there is no democracy.

[–] gezero@lemmy.bowyerhub.uk 7 points 6 hours ago

I do. On my imaginary scale around 4 out of 10. So far the mess looks to me like it was voted in.

[–] Freewheel@lemmynsfw.com 6 points 1 hour ago

First off, I'm an American. Born a stone's throw from the location of one of the critical events in the history of the American revolution.

To answer the question, no. Leaving aside the whole Republic versus democracy argument, my point of realization was when one party seized upon a minor technical issue and disenfranchised countless voters via lawsuit, sufficient to allow the race to be called in their favor.

I'm sure there are many readers who believe I'm talking about 2016. For those readers, your keyword search is "hanging Chad".

[–] rpl6475@lemmy.ml 6 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Elective dictatorship, there is no accountability. Is there even a mechanism for the public to recall the president? Or is that it for the next 4 years?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Kidplayer_666@lemm.ee 6 points 6 hours ago

Yes. But becoming more flawed by the day

[–] cronenthal@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 6 hours ago

No, unfortunately.

[–] Zoldyck@lemmy.world 6 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

No. I also don't consider the United States to be a democracy.

[–] uhmbah@lemmy.ca 5 points 2 hours ago
[–] javacafe01@lemmy.sdf.org 5 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

I am inside and I want to get out

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] jabathekek@sopuli.xyz 5 points 6 hours ago

Never has been.

BRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRT

[–] echo@lemmings.world 5 points 6 hours ago
[–] NeoNachtwaechter@lemmy.world 4 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

A demo-crazy.

Note that it is not democracy what Trumpeltier is destroying at the moment. It is the functioning of the state. This will take so many years to rebuild, if possible at all.

[–] SereneSadie@lemmy.myserv.one 4 points 3 hours ago

I don't recognise the current American regime as a valid government. Just like I don't recognise the Israeli occupation force as a valid state.

It's not remotely binding or even meaningful to anyone but myself of course. But hey, nothing matters these days.

[–] Ziggurat@jlai.lu 3 points 6 hours ago

Serious answer : I am not living there, have no idea how to compare, nor whether the court system works as a safeguard.

Troll answer In democracy you have the right to healthcare and education, so it's been a while it isn't

[–] rickdg@lemmy.world 3 points 3 hours ago

Is demos how you say money in Greek?

[–] humanspiral@lemmy.ca 3 points 26 minutes ago (1 children)

Ignoring court orders, and "fake national emergency declarations" to create war and international extortion and remove rights and citizenships for deportations crossed the line. The voter suppression/rigging that won election for Trump is also clearly anti-democratic, but anti-democratic as usual. Media/oligarchy/Israel influence/disinformation might not make for an ideal democracy, but also "democracy as usual".

The big problem with the world is the US empire's manufacturing of hatred/war against "those who are less democratic than us and our colonies" Corruption of democracy in US, who can cheaply manipulate democracy in its colonies, means that you don't have functional democracy either. There is something wrong when the most important issue of your government is to increase divisiveness/threats to the US's enemies when the US unjustifiably threatens you, and that thrills you as right track.

So, democracy is simply not working at bringing progressiveness and shared prosperity, or even the most basic understanding of humanist/national interests, to those who say they love it so much. This is global collapse level of delusion. Nations doing best economically are those distancing themselves from US colonial control.

The more objective measure of "good government" is control against oligarchist pillaging, while having pluralism/sustainability, and economic constructiveness. US approved democracies are failing hard on these metrics. Warmongering based on "blanket, evidence free, refusal to accept election results when non-CIA candidate wins" is not the democratic/liberal ideal you think it is.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Etterra@discuss.online 3 points 4 hours ago

Shit I live inside the US and I barely consider it a democracy.

load more comments
view more: next ›