this post was submitted on 19 Jun 2025
523 points (98.3% liked)

Technology

71636 readers
3209 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] BigMacHole@sopuli.xyz 123 points 1 day ago (1 children)

MAYBE if we Cut the FAA and OTHER Regulatory agencies it'll not Explode next Time?

[–] Kyrgizion@lemmy.world 29 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Musk is going to be PISSED when he finds out there is no bureau of physics he can subsume or destroy from within. I believe one Rush Stockton came to a similar conclusion, if he indeed had time for that conclusion to even form before perishing.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] SalamenceFury@lemmy.world 60 points 1 day ago (9 children)

People really put the faith of the entire American space program on Elon. It would be funny if it wasn't so stupid.

[–] weew@lemmy.ca 29 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago) (2 children)

It's less that people are putting faith in Elon (sure, some fanatics might be), but it's that everyone else is somehow even worse.

SpaceX is actually getting stuff to space, despite their prototypes blowing up. Hell, even if this Starship thing is a complete failure and never works, their existing rocket, the Falcon, is still far beyond any of the competition.

The SLS: $10 Billion and a decade late to develop a ship that recycles old Space shuttle parts, then costs $2-3 Billion per launch, and maybe can only launch one every 2 years.

ULA Vulcan: currently years late, still finding problems, and even after all that gets worked out, it can maybe do 6 launches a year?

SpaceX: 1-2 launches per week.

That's not faith, that's just facts. I would absolutely love to have somebody else step up and take SpaceX's crown, but... there really isn't anybody. Bezos's Blue Origin may have the biggest chance, but they are more likely to act like ULA than SpaceX.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] theherk@lemmy.world 12 points 22 hours ago

Falcon 9 has launched over 500 mission with a very high success rate. Of course the bulk of advancement should be coming from NASA and we need to spend more there, but SpaceX is putting up big numbers in successful payload lifts.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] diemartin@sh.itjust.works 50 points 22 hours ago (4 children)
[–] Kyrgizion@lemmy.world 9 points 11 hours ago (2 children)

I would ride a Honda rocket a hundred times before ever setting foot on anything developed by SpaceX

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] oyzmo@lemmy.world 48 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (13 children)

I think Honda has begun building spaceships/rockets too. Think they chose to build the type that don't explode. link

[–] Geodad@lemmy.world 8 points 18 hours ago (4 children)

Japanese cars are superior to American cars, why wouldn't their rockets be?

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (12 replies)
[–] wpb@lemmy.world 47 points 11 hours ago (6 children)

It's not perfect, but capitalism is the best system we've got. It is only through competition on the free market that we would arrive at a space program this efficient and innovative. Imagine if the government tried to do this! They would've blown up a 100 rockets by now with nothing to show for it, and it would've cost tax payers billions of dollars. The innovation of SpaceX is humanity at it's finest. For thousands of years we've looked up at the sky, and wondered what's there, and now, thanks to the engineering chops of Elon Musk, it is within our grasp. Imagine that, sending a person to space. Maybe someday we'll even be able to put someone on the moon!

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 17 points 9 hours ago

The efficiency of this is amazing, instead of actually sending it up, and waiting for it to blow up, they have figured out how to blow it up on the ground BEFORE launch. This is the kind of efficiency we need in government programs.

[–] Kyrgizion@lemmy.world 13 points 11 hours ago

Ngl, had me in the first half.

[–] merdaverse@lemmy.world 13 points 8 hours ago

Such a remarkable achievement! We should put capitalists on the Starship ASAP so they can enjoy the fruits of "their" labor!

[–] Tattorack@lemmy.world 11 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Good gods! Captain, The ambient sarcasm readings are off the charts!

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] forgetful_fox@lemmy.world 41 points 23 hours ago
[–] PunkRockSportsFan@fanaticus.social 28 points 1 day ago (5 children)

Was he on it? If he was this is a complete success.

If he wasn’t.

Better luck next time I guess?

[–] victorz@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Elon is stupid, but I'm thinking he's not so stupid as to board one of his own rockets.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 23 points 7 hours ago (3 children)

It’s not a big deal when you’re blowing up someone else’s money with no real accountability.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] seven_phone@lemmy.world 23 points 1 day ago (2 children)

It's not a starship, at best it's a low Earth orbit ship.

[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 11 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Well, now it's recycling, right?

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Stovetop@lemmy.world 22 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Waiting for the SpaceX bros to tell everyone how this was actually a good thing because it was supposed to happen and means everything is going well.

[–] real_squids@sopuli.xyz 10 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

As long as nobody was harmed they could blow up a hundred rockets for all I care. Maybe it'll even help with competition, like make other companies switch launch vehicles, so it might be a good thing (just not for them) lol

[–] Stovetop@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago (2 children)

People live around there, so harm is definitely being done to the air they breathe and the environment they live in.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] pyre@lemmy.world 19 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

good.

sad that he wasn't on it though.

[–] Regrettable_incident@lemmy.world 7 points 13 hours ago

I feel bad for all the engineers etc who are working really hard on these projects, only to see their efforts tarnished by the flyblown image of the wanker who owns the company.

[–] OCATMBBL@lemmy.world 19 points 17 hours ago

How many times does this gotta happen before we start calling them missiles instead of rockets?

[–] breakingcups@lemmy.world 18 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It's kinda fun to be living in a time where rockets regularly blow up again. Apart from, you know, everything else going on and not wanting astronauts to die.

[–] MysteriousSophon21@lemmy.world 7 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

Honestly, rocket development has always been filled with explosions - the Saturn V had like 6 engine-out events during Apollo and the early Falcon 9 tests were just as explosive. what's different now is we get to see the failures in HD livestreams instead of classified footage that would've been buried in the 60s.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] aeternum@lemmy.blahaj.zone 16 points 12 hours ago (12 children)

Whoa. a subpar Elon project? SAY IT ISN'T SO!

load more comments (12 replies)
[–] drmoose@lemmy.world 15 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

If you told me that I'd be cheering for space rockets exploding 10 years ago I would have called you crazy. Incredible how much damage that fiend has done to our society.

[–] Kyrgizion@lemmy.world 6 points 11 hours ago

It's incredible, isn't it? I used to be so stoked on space exploration and all the science that goes with it. Still am, really, but my enthusiasm has cooled markedly once billionaires started throwing dick-shaped space missiles around for no other reason than being able to.

[–] drhodl@lemmy.world 14 points 20 hours ago

I'm all for mankind colonizing the stars, but I don't want that A hole down a K hole Elmo involved in any way. I don't trust the cunt not to have a back door into the colony, that he opens whenever his fee fee's get hurt, or if his K hole runs dry.

[–] bieren@lemmy.zip 12 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

“Look at what I can do” -Elon musk while throwing a Nazi salute

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] jaybone@lemmy.zip 11 points 1 day ago

Unplanned rapid disassembly?

[–] biofaust@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I now have the Street Fighter voice in my head going:

"Honda Wins!"

For the killjoy that will come pointing out that SpaceX is at another level of development etc., yes, I know that. Japan also has a constitution written by the US that doesn't permit them to have long-range missiles.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 8 points 12 hours ago

It’s certainly not Honda-level reliability.

[–] MisterOwl@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago

oh no! anyway...

[–] XeroxCool@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago

That's better efficiency. It gets to the blowing up part faster than before

[–] RizzRustbolt@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Getting it out of the way so the engineers can enjoy the long weekend.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] NigelFrobisher@aussie.zone 6 points 10 hours ago

Have they published its drug test results yet?

load more comments
view more: next ›