this post was submitted on 15 Jun 2025
234 points (97.2% liked)

Technology

71636 readers
3437 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 49 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] PhobosAnomaly@feddit.uk 77 points 4 days ago (6 children)

Speaking as a layman, I just think it's fuckin' awesome how a big chonky boi can be propelled upwards at Mach Yeet and get casually dropped off in orbit.

Even though Musk is a cunt, I still love watching SpaceX streams to see big bits of metal get put upwards by lots of fire and noise, and then fuckin' land where they started seven or eight minutes later.

Science is fuckin mint, man.

[–] lka1988@lemmy.dbzer0.com 44 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (2 children)

Don't quote me on this, but I've heard SpaceX itself is pretty good at keeping Musk away from the actually important things. Something about having a team dedicated to keeping him distracted.

[–] PhobosAnomaly@feddit.uk 25 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Yeah it's a shame that Musk is so inextricably linked with the brand. I'm quite sure SpaceX and Tesla are full of top tier talent and engineering wizards... but have a direct link to a toxic cockwomble that bankrolls them. Shame.

[–] CeeBee_Eh@lemmy.world 8 points 3 days ago

And yet whenever some achievement is made, the headlines are "Musk achieves great feat"

[–] seemefeelme@infosec.pub 2 points 3 days ago

Imagine getting a job at SpaceX thinking you're gonna build a moon base and you get put on 'Elon distraction' 😭

[–] kernelle@0d.gs 17 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I like your funny words, magic man

[–] PhobosAnomaly@feddit.uk 9 points 4 days ago

I'm surprised I strung so many together coherently to be honest!

[–] entwine413@lemm.ee 7 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Have you had a chance to play Kerbal Space Program yet? If not, I think you'd really enjoy it.

[–] PhobosAnomaly@feddit.uk 6 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I haven't, no - and you're probably right, yes.

I worry that if I start playing KSP then my other half and kids won't see me again for six months because it does sound fucking awesome and highly rewarding.

Nope, I'm a simple man. I play through a couple of Doom WADs each summer in the academic off-season and that's my gaming appetite satiated.

[–] ouRKaoS@lemmy.today 7 points 4 days ago

I made the mistake of thinking KSP was a game and not literal mother fucking rocket science.

There was a lot of explosions and no space.

[–] macaw_dean_settle@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago

Does not live up to the hype.

[–] altphoto@lemmy.today 1 points 3 days ago

4, 3, 2, 1... Reverse! We have reverse!... And we're turning... Putting it on D....hit the gas pedal... All systems nominal! The vehicle is gaining speed at 25mph. Entering the 5north at 45mph in climbing... 65! We have reached max Q...honey tell the kids what max Q means....kids, maxQ is when the vehicle sees maximum hydrodynamic pressure.

Trying to avoid MECO at all costs until we park.

[–] MNByChoice@midwest.social 20 points 4 days ago (2 children)

changes on Earth’s surface down to the centimetre

These things really fuck with nude sunbathing.

[–] hakunawazo@lemmy.world 8 points 3 days ago

Some of us are blessed with

collapsed inline media

They need to launch a much more expensive satellite for that.

[–] hraegsvelmir@ani.social 7 points 4 days ago

Hey, if they want to put themselves through looking at me in the nude, they can inflict that pain on themselves. I'd be more worried about them tracking everything else someone does day to day, and who could get their hands on that data.

[–] espentan@lemmy.world 18 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Just what we needed, more surveillance /s

[–] ArgumentativeMonotheist@lemmy.world 12 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Scary. In whose hands will this technological marvel be?

[–] bathing_in_bismuth@sh.itjust.works 8 points 3 days ago (2 children)

This is absolutely fucked. Bring down the all seeing eye in the sky satelite

[–] PlantJam@lemmy.world 10 points 3 days ago (2 children)

"All seeing" except it's using radar to evaluate typography and biomass. What am I missing that makes this "absolutely fucked"?

[–] SkaveRat@discuss.tchncs.de 7 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Impressive that it has the resolution to identify fonts

[–] PlantJam@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago

I was so confused when I saw your comment until I reread my own. It really is top notch technology I guess!

[–] Brickhead92@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago

This first iteration is only capable of identifying serif fonts, still impressive though.

[–] x00z@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Aren't you a tiny blob of typography and biomass yourself?

[–] PlantJam@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago

How did you know? Really though I was looking at the picture in the article which is from similar technology about a decade ago.

[–] untakenusername@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

they've had spy sats since the 1960s

its not that bad

[–] daggermoon@lemmy.world 7 points 4 days ago

I recall a Judas Priest song about this.

[–] jim3692@discuss.online -2 points 4 days ago (3 children)

Don't such satellites have a major flaw, that they revolve? Considering that earth is spherical, those satellites can only monitor some half of the earth each moment, given their sensors have such high FOV.

[–] transientpunk@sh.itjust.works 11 points 4 days ago

How is that a flaw? It just sounds like a design consideration...

[–] catloaf@lemm.ee 4 points 4 days ago

Yes that's how one satellite can image a lot of area.

[–] JasonDJ@lemmy.zip 2 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (3 children)

Do you expect the satellite to see the whole earth?

You know it's night for like half of it, yea?

[–] EtherWhack@lemmy.world 6 points 4 days ago

What are you talking about? There's only one side. /s

[–] TheTechnician27@lemmy.world 4 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

I'm not agreeing with their dumb point, but just pointing out: this satellite works on radar. I'm genuinely concerned how many people seem to be commenting without reading the article.

[–] macaw_dean_settle@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago

*yeah, not yea or nay. It isn't a vote.