shareholders and board members in corporations that do this nonsense need to be criminally charged and given appropriate sentences. corps want “rights” like humans and shareholders want corps to put profit first? then they can all be treated like the motherfucking criminals they are.
this post was submitted on 02 Jun 2025
373 points (100.0% liked)
News
29704 readers
3092 users here now
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.
Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.
7. No duplicate posts.
If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners.
The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
yes. i mean ALL shareholders. all it’ll take is once and the whole system will change when grandma goes to jail because her 401k has stock in this criminal entity.
Don't get me wrong - this is absolute bullshit, but no, that's a bad take.
The people that regulate this don't give a shit if the average person is prosecuted because it doesn't affect them. The only actual way the system gets changed is if the obscenely wealthy/regulators/lawmakers who profit over this go to jail. Not some schmuck with a 401(k).
You penalize folks that happen to have a single share of this in their retirement portfolio, all you're doing is screwing over the chunk of the populace that is already overworked and just trying to survive by shoving what they can into recommended retirement funds.
Not to mention that most people have no idea what's in their 401k. They just stick it into a mutual fund or agree to the company advisor or something and let it go.
If you really want to do something that will encourage change, stop thinking about jailing the worker with the 401k and start thinking about jailing the board and the C-suite.
Absolutely agree.
jail them according to proportions owned. this will get the C suite life and grandma a fine and will get the ones who see this happen actually making change, in the manners necessary.
No, I see value in Grand doing 24 hours of community service in some sort of mental/physical health settings for poor people. That way she sees what she and her friends and family are facing, one major medical event away. Let her tell everyone about those turned away.
ok. works for me. i just think that if soup-to-nuts people “felt” the choices the corporations made in ways they actually felt - wallet or free time - things will change. corps will be dissolved. c suites jailed. yadda yadda.
“what are you in for?”
“i was majority shareholder in a corp that chose profit over people.”
load more comments
(13 replies)
I'd be fine with the compromise that your sentence should be proportional to your level of stake in the company. So, grandma's .00001 shares would get her community service, while the 51% holder gets life.
Yep, grandma, who had maybe a base level of knowledge of where her retirement was invested, should serve time for the fact that the funds her advisor picked happened to contain a share of this company.
Not, you know, the fund advisor that actually understands what she's investing in.
load more comments
(3 replies)
completely agree.
Look, either Grandma is contributing waaaaayyyyyyy too much to her 401k, or Grandma's portfolio is tied up in a bunch of small shitty companies or it's all in one slightly less small shitty company. Whatever it is, if Grandma's monthly contributions are enough to have a controlling vote in a company, she needs a new financial advisor.
haha true. but when I send money to hamas, I’m “supporting terrorists.”
but grandma allows her money to be sent to a corp that chooses to kill people and … she’s just little ole grandma?
pfft. :p
At this point, I'm being redundant, but:
To "send money to hamas" you need to actively do so. To "alllow her money to be sent to a corp that chooses to kill people" - that's literally retirement in the US?
I'm literally not saying it's a good thing but - not understanding the difference between these two is an impressive level of cognitive dissonance.
of course I understand the difference - you don’t seem to understand how proportional response would work when grandma is told her 401k is fined because she funded a murderous corporation. her fund manager gets a few days time. the corporation c suite gets months and the board gets decades.
Why are you sending your money to Hamas? That's a bad retirement plan, too. You're supposed to stuff all your money into your mattress.
That's why you spend the first 20 years of your career buying various mattresses, so that you'll have enough storage for when you retire as a billionaire. And when the government wants you to pay for taxes, you just send them a mattress.
haha i am of course not sending money to hamas lol. it’s just to prove a point in the thread.
I agree. But I wonder: if the law isn't able or willing to help, what recourse is there? What is to be done?
protest and running for office?
Mine isn’t as bad as that, but I went through a dozen listings before I found an up to date one. The information is so old sometimes. One place I called said that doctor had not even been there for two years. Just lazy people
It's not a bug. it's a feature. Because if you don't get the care you need, they don't have to pay! 😡
"Navigating the Healthcare system" is code for: Good luck suckers!!!
lazy. on. purpose.
I owe my psychiatrists office thousands, because none of my employer provided insurance options has ever covered it. The best “coverage” I had was up to 10 therapist visits per year. No coverage of the medical visits, and when I needed therapy every other week, they did not cover any of it. I’m lucky that they have not cut me off. And if they do cut me off, I’m properly fucked. I can’t go off of my meds, I just can’t function properly without them. I’d quickly end up in a very serious situation.
That's a really sucky situation to be in. I'm glad that they haven't cut you off, but I can imagine that the stress of the possibility makes engaging with therapy harder than it should be.
It really highlights for me, the lack of empathy of the insurance companies, and the general public at large. They want people like me to be functioning members of society, but don’t care enough to offer proper resources for us. My mania results in destructive impulsivity, in combination with extreme emotional/mood swings that make maintaining relationships exhausting for those around me. The meds help keep me evened out enough to function. People don’t understand the plight of those with mental disorders (and mine is nothing compared to those who have it much worse), so they respond with apathy most of the time.
Most insurance plans don't cover mental health beyond trivial interactions for a trivial period of time. Most metal healh professionals don't accept insurance because they can't afford to. After a decade between school and "volunteering", insurance companies offer a wage that could easily be made with far less stress, responsibility, and accountability. Earnings can be "clawed back" by an insurane company at any time.
Most insurance companies don't provide out of network benefits, because they can make more profit by exploiting customers and labor. Often pitting them against each other to avoid any responsibility.
MHPAEA is a fucking joke. For profit healthcare should be illegal.
Free Luigi!
He did his bit. One luigi per ceo, not one luigi for all the ceos
I don't care how many Luigis it takes, as long as we get all of the CEOs, and free all of the Luigis.
Don’t forget, there is basically no oversight on therapists, so if your therapist tells you you should quit your job to “submit” to your husband, then disappears after a week or so of torture, meaning that you navigate a divorce with zero access to domestic violence supports, your life is over and there is no consequences!
There is a lot of oversight on therapists, every state has a regulatory board. We have to go through thousands of client hours before getting our license, which can get revoked if we do anything illegal or unethical. Maybe you’re thinking of life coaches?
Not in the south.
What state doesn’t have a regulatory board?
Regulatory boards can exist but only choose to meet a few times a year, refuse to investigate anything that happens to a certain class of people, and also just not want to do their jobs because social services and regulatory agencies are like weekend clubs here.
Things are not working to the point I am trying to whistleblow a decades long “industrially scamming the free school lunch funds” and no one gives a shit. No one gives a shit about anything, Jesus Christ it’s Oklahoma. There are no consequences for anything here.
Joke's on you, I use BetterHelp
Seems like this is a state by state issue. I didn’t have this issue on Medicaid or paid for insurance (not marketplace).
view more: next ›