this post was submitted on 01 Jun 2025
400 points (98.8% liked)

News

30768 readers
2304 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

When NPR sued Donald Trump Tuesday, it had an easy argument to go with. Normally, in First Amendment retaliation cases against the government, you have to pull together a bunch of disparate strands to prove the retaliatory intent of the actions. But as NPR noted in its filing, and as Justice Scalia once wrote about obvious constitutional violations: “this wolf comes as a wolf.”

Trump’s executive order cutting public media funding doesn’t even pretend to hide its retaliatory nature — it literally calls NPR and PBS “biased media” in the title.

Republicans have been gunning for public media for decades, but historically, every time Congress tries to cut funding, outcry from their constituents is so overwhelming that nothing ever happens. It turns out tons of people (including Republican voters) actually like NPR and PBS. But Trump skipped Congress entirely and simply declared that public media wouldn’t be receiving any more federal funding — because he thinks their coverage hurts his feelings.

top 17 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Jerb322@lemmy.world 114 points 1 month ago (2 children)

TACO, the biggest snowflake.

[–] match@pawb.social 10 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] grue@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Something something "New York City‽"

Also, !hailcorporate and fuck advertising for making me remember that.

[–] projectsquared@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

Get a rope!

[–] lambda@programming.dev 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] kipo@lemm.ee 5 points 1 month ago

Trump Always Chickens Out ™

[–] dhork@lemmy.world 76 points 1 month ago (1 children)

It's because the administration is not counting on winning the case on its merits. They are counting on winning the case because they expect judges that Trump appointed to create new precedent in his favor. He wants "his" judges to do what he wants. Judges that don't immediately comply (particularly conservative judges) will immediately be put on the "nasty" list.

Do not forget all the J6ers he pardoned. These people showed they would do violence for Trump once, and they got rewarded for it. They will do it again. Also, the administration has already started arresting judges they don't like. And for all the compliant judges, we all know that the Supreme Court recently made ~~bribes~~ gratuities legal, and the President is literally making his own currency now. So he has both sticks and carrots to use to get his way.

Congress has rolled over in submission to King Trump, and he is now working on the judiciary.

[–] catloaf@lemm.ee 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Maybe. So far, SCOTUS has not rolled over. They've been open to the administration's arguments, but I've been surprised that they haven't just rolled over. Even Coney Barrett has been against him.

They want to maintain the independent power of the courts, but none can have power except Trump.

[–] nkat2112@sh.itjust.works 34 points 1 month ago (3 children)

But as NPR noted in its filing, and as Justice Scalia once wrote about obvious constitutional violations: “this wolf comes as a wolf.”

Trump’s executive order cutting public media funding doesn’t even pretend to hide its retaliatory nature — it literally calls NPR and PBS “biased media” in the title.

Aside from destroying one's career and reputation, it must be extraordinarily difficult to represent Felon Drink Bleach as a lawyer.

It must also be somewhat demoralizing to be on the side that loses such a great proportion of court cases.

The attorneys in it for the money dropped off at the time of his impeachments. Those that are left? They are gambling for access to power.

Pam Bondi and Alina Habba were Trump's personal lawyers. Stupefyingly incompetent conspiracy theorists and utterly uninterested in a payday (along with justice or truth). Their only qualifications were that they drank Trump's Kool-aid and were pushing it on the public. They are now the Attorney General and US Attorney for the District of New Jersey, respectively.

[–] Nusm@yall.theatl.social 13 points 1 month ago (2 children)

It can’t be because it pays so well. With Trump you always run the risk of getting shafted on the bill.

[–] laurelraven@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 1 month ago

Any lawyer who would work for him without requiring payment upfront and enough to retire on is a fool who isn't competent enough to practice law anyway and deserve everything they get

[–] Dragomus@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

The money is not their main driving goal, they know, or realize that Trump can shaft them on the payments.

What they do think they'll gain is to be seen as a legal force to be reckoned with.

It does not matter if their legal strategy is a twisted mess of lies and wrong assumptions, they see trump controlling the courts and any win he is given by a corrupt judge reflects on them as a pure win on the case. And that is something they can wear as a badge while he is in office.

They also just bet on this regime sticking around for a long time so they can clutch to their status for quite a while, perhaps it leads to some lucrative advisory contracts down the line.

[–] andrewta@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Even if I agreed with everything that Orange baboon said, I still would never work with or for him. The damage to my career would be incalculable. Might as well go flip burgers after that

[–] jonne@infosec.pub 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Yeah, I keep being amazed how many people that definitely should know better keep falling for his crap. I get that your average MAGA rally attendee is just the type that gets scammed routinely, but he's got actual billionaires, successful lawyers and business people falling for the same shit, after a first administration where nobody came out of it looking good.

[–] andrewta@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

Exactly I remember certain people who worked in his administration, who, after the fact said, I can’t even get hired anywhere. Why would anybody else sign up?