andrewta

joined 2 years ago
[–] andrewta@lemmy.world 1 points 59 minutes ago

And now I've been here for two years

[–] andrewta@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (2 children)

You’ve been on this account for two years. Happy birthday

[–] andrewta@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Heard it from the adults in my small town (not in the south of the US)

[–] andrewta@lemmy.world 12 points 2 days ago (4 children)

That if two people of different races had a kid together there was a higher chance of birth defects.

[–] andrewta@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago (3 children)

Can I (aks) you something?

[–] andrewta@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago

Too many to count. A lot of the current slang

Rizz comes close to the top of the list

[–] andrewta@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago

Having NATO fall apart is the worst thing in the world for democracy, the only person who is cheering this on is Putin and the people who Putin.

[–] andrewta@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Are we, including or excluding that it’s all, but been confirmed that he is a Russian asset ?whether it’s willing or unwilling remains to be seen.

[–] andrewta@lemmy.world 9 points 3 days ago

Meanwhile, Putin and Russia is cheering this on. The parties they are going to throw are going to be absolutely epic. You’ve heard the party of the decade, you’ve heard of the party of the century, get ready for the party of the millennium.

[–] andrewta@lemmy.world 55 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Low temps. My brain boils in high temps. Heat exhaustion too many times. I’d be dead.

[–] andrewta@lemmy.world 6 points 4 days ago

Wanted to be in the US Air Force. Had no intention of being there for the short term, wanted to stay for a very long career. Screwed up my knees during basic. Was told my dream of serving was gone.

[–] andrewta@lemmy.world 3 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Future vision. Hello stock market. They can kick me out of a casino for winning too much but they can’t really do anything if I’m making too much money in the stock market. Even if they tried to claim insider trading or market manipulation or whatever they still have to prove it in a courtroom. They fail because I’d have attorneys because even a halfway decent attorney would win that one. I wouldn’t even have to claim my future vision I could just claim i’m just picking the stocks. They’d have to prove that I’m doing something else.

 

Video in question

What she says is that she got equity in the divorce, but when she graduates school, she has to refinance and then pay the equity back.

I need somebody who understands finance to help me answer these questions. Is what she is saying that she got the equity at the time divorce, then when she graduates school, she takes out a loan and uses that loan to pay the equity back to the ex-husband?

The second question: if the above is the case, and in the context of the video, if she doesn’t think he will live that long, Why would she want to forgo the alimony then?

I mean, she isn’t getting the alimony right now, but she has the equity in the house which it sounds like she got that already, if he dies early well then she just basically keeps the equity so I’m not sure why she wants to Make the change she wants to make.

I’m not looking for the emotional answers of she’s a money grabber or a horrible person or any of those sorts of answers. Because that’s not what I’m asking.

What I’m trying to understand is the financial piece of it.

Because she said she would be willing to forgo the alimony if she could just have the equity now. But it sounds like she she’s already got the equity so I’m really confused.

Can someone watch that video and try to help me understand what financial benefit she’s going after?

 

video short of the episode in question

anyone know which episode of Star Wars Clone Wars this video is from?

 

Color me shocked

 

For example I'll send an e-mail with 3 questions and will only get an answer to one of the questions. It's worse when there are 2 yes/no questions with a question that is obviously not a yes/no question. Then I get a response of

Yes

back in the e-mail. So which question are they answering?

Mainly I'm asking all of you why do people insist on only answering 1 question out of an e-mail where there are multiple? Do people just not read? Are people that lazy? What is going on?

Edit at this point I’ve got the answers . Some are too lazy to actually read. Some admit they get focused on one item and forget to go back. I understand the second group. The first group yeah no excuse there.

Continuing edit: there are comments where people have tried the bullet points and they say it still doesn’t help. I might put the needed questions in red.

 

I finally got the bottom bar to be the color that I want instead of stupid gray. But whenever I’m moused over something in the system, it’s impossible to see what I’m really actually moused over. Is there a way to change that highlight color?

In the photo I’ve attached. It’s somewhat easy to see it, but in real life unless you’re sitting way off the side of the computer screen, you literally can’t see what is highlighted. It’s basically gray on gray. On a side note, I wanna meet the people who actually designed this interface give them a piece of my mind. But big question how do I change the highlight color of what I’m moused over.?

 
view more: next ›