this post was submitted on 19 May 2025
190 points (97.5% liked)

News

29483 readers
3283 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 33 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] capt_wolf@lemmy.world 52 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

Sure, since he's keen on continuing to flush the whole constitution down the toilet at this point, free speech seems like the next thing to go naturally. I can't wait to be branded an enemy of the state.

[–] DarkFuture@lemmy.world 17 points 3 days ago

Yeah at this point you can kiss the Constitution goodbye.

Buy guns before you can't. We'll probably end up needing them the way things are headed.

[–] NoForwardslashS@sopuli.xyz 45 points 3 days ago (2 children)

If I've learned anything about the US justice system it's that it is pointless to prosecute rich people. They will just get convicted of and then still get off scot free for rape, treason, insurrection etc.

[–] DarkFuture@lemmy.world 18 points 3 days ago (1 children)

It's a simple fact now that the American justice system is a joke. As is the country in general.

[–] Aeao@lemmy.world 10 points 3 days ago

It's the best system money can buy.

[–] FenderStratocaster@lemmy.world 39 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Imagine being such a fucking baby that Bruce Springsteen intimidates you.

[–] AmidFuror@fedia.io 4 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Why does this read like a backhanded dig at Springsteen?

[–] FenderStratocaster@lemmy.world 25 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Bruce Springsteen is famously a nice guy. To be intimated by him would mean you would have to be wildly insecure.

[–] k0e3@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

And I'm thinking that a person would have to be an absolute dick for a nice guy like Springsteen to criticise said person.

[–] dustyData@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago

It's like being intimidated by Mr. Rogers. You have to be the most insecure monster to feel like unconditional kindness is threatening to you.

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

trump doesn't like that people call Springsteen the Boss.

[–] TheReturnOfPEB@reddthat.com 22 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

https://www.newsweek.com/snoop-dogg-trump-inauguration-2017523

whatever, crybaby.

the threat of a probe is Trump starting to extort money from those performers using the government to do so in my opinion.

[–] kylie_kraft@lemmy.world 12 points 3 days ago

Perhaps, just maybe, a toddler tantrum over a losing campaign paying production costs to performer's crews just like every campaign does, perhaps that's an attempt at deflection from the goddamn president of the United States accepting a luxury airplane from a foreign government which is explicitly forbidden by law.

[–] WizardofFrobozz@lemmy.ca 12 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] andrewta@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

The American government continues to allow it.

But yeah that is true.

[–] WizardofFrobozz@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

The American people are the government. They’ve abdicated responsibility. The citizens are the ones allowing this to continue. They have LONG been aware they can’t count on their elected officials- and your comment does nothing but give them cover for their absolute cowardice.

[–] andrewta@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

So enlighten us. Specifically what do you propose that the citizens actually do?

[–] WizardofFrobozz@lemmy.ca -2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Asked and answered, repeatedly, in almost every relevant discussion on this site (to say nothing of every history book you’ve ever read)- but hey, you already know this, and yet, have decided that getting defensive is the best response here.

[–] CentauriBeau@lemm.ee 11 points 2 days ago

If I’ve learned anything watching him, if he accuses someone else of something it’s only because he’s doing it and figures they must be. So how much did Kid Rock get?

[–] Deadeyegai@lemmy.world 11 points 3 days ago

As is always the case with Mango Mussolini and these sewer clowns, every accusation is a confession.

Shocker, he doesn't understand why you would pay people involved in production because he just ignores them

[–] Vanilla_PuddinFudge@infosec.pub 9 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Major Investigation?

is he friends with General Specific and Private Public?

[–] Bakkoda@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 day ago

He has been known to grab privates.

[–] bstix@feddit.dk 8 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Wtf. Complete gibberish. The idiot doesn't even understand the direction of a transaction.

How can ... Democrats paying some Bruce guy to play guitar... be an illegal campaign contribution. To the Democrats?

I have to wonder if he ever learned how a payment works. He grew up rich. Did he ever purchase anything from a store in which you get something and then pay for it by giving the store money?

Is he really on that level of stupidity?

This explains everything.

[–] andrewta@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

the key factor is whether the endorsement is part of a coordinated campaign effort or is simply a public communication. If it's a legitimate endorsement to the public, it's generally permissible. However, if it's part of a broader strategy to influence the election AND is coordinated with the candidate, it could be subject to campaign finance regulations.

Campaign laws in the US are strange at times.

I’m not saying laws were broke, personally I doubt they were, just giving info.

[–] bstix@feddit.dk 2 points 2 days ago

Yeah that'll be a nice waste of time for the lawyers who think they'll be paid for doing a massive investigation.

[–] rumba@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 day ago

God king makes up the rules. He's attempting to set it up so that whatever he writes in an executive order is immutable.

We can look at this now and go God this is stupid, But be careful we're not very far off it being actionable. He would absolutely love to imprison the competition and anyone that helped them.

[–] IamSparticles@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 day ago

He's just pissed because Springsteen said mean words about him. So now, like the big crybaby he is, he's going to shout and whine about how it isn't fair and make all kinds of threats to get even.

[–] Almacca@aussie.zone 6 points 2 days ago

No one's going to stop him.

Boy, that Bruce Springsteen guy really got under his thinned skin...all layers of it.