this post was submitted on 10 Mar 2025
105 points (83.4% liked)

Fediverse

31192 readers
996 users here now

A community to talk about the Fediverse and all it's related services using ActivityPub (Mastodon, Lemmy, KBin, etc).

If you wanted to get help with moderating your own community then head over to !moderators@lemmy.world!

Rules

Learn more at these websites: Join The Fediverse Wiki, Fediverse.info, Wikipedia Page, The Federation Info (Stats), FediDB (Stats), Sub Rehab (Reddit Migration)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

So. What Am I getting banned?

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] m_f@discuss.online 83 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Not really sure how that works with federation. You're not "using" lemmy.world, you're using lemm.ee, which has a copy of content from lemmy.world.

[–] lambalicious@lemmy.sdf.org 19 points 7 hours ago

I think you've pretty much nailed it. KFC can't ban you from buying a Burguer King that McDonalds is secondhand selling.

[–] fxomt@lemmy.dbzer0.com 59 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago) (2 children)

This particular thread is hosted on lemmy.world and you must be 18+ to access it.

Nah, admins only care about their own instance. So a LW admin would only care about underage LW users.

Admins don't have the time to moderate for other instances. I'm already busy enough with dbzer0, lemm.ee's business is theirs. (as long as they're not posting CSAM or scams)

edit: I should mention that you still have to follow the COCs of instances, but most of them can be boiled down to: Don't be a huge dick, and don't be racist/anything-phobic.

[–] sag@lemm.ee 16 points 10 hours ago (2 children)

lemm.ee allow 16+ year old users.

[–] fxomt@lemmy.dbzer0.com 23 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago) (1 children)

Should be fine, then. You're on .ee not .world, they're not going to vet your account for age ;)

edit: I should mention that you still have to follow the COCs of instances, but most of them can be boiled down to: Don't be a huge dick, and don't be racist/anything-phobic.

[–] sag@lemm.ee 13 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago) (1 children)

Don't be a huge dick, and don't be racist/anything-phobic.

I leaved Reddit because of this. And I choose Lemmy over other Social Media app to ignore this. I can safely say I am not. I don't even joke about it like some edgy teenager thinking saying N-Word is fucking cool or saying Hitler was a good person and everyone should do it too. Or Hating LGBTQ person.

[–] Blaze@lemmy.dbzer0.com 16 points 9 hours ago

You're a cool poster

[–] comfy@lemmy.ml 5 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago) (2 children)

I believe the most an admin can do is block you from their own instance (e.g. lemmy.world banning you from lemmy.world communities), they don't own your account on lemm.ee so they can't ban your account from accessing the comms they don't control, and lemm.ee has no reason to ban you.

Tagging @fxomt@lemmy.dbzer0.com

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] LandedGentry@lemmy.zip 7 points 8 hours ago (2 children)

And despite how simple it is people still find new and interesting ways to be bigoted. It’s impressive really

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Blaze@lemmy.dbzer0.com 51 points 11 hours ago (3 children)

No one under 18 years of age or under the regulated minimum age defined by your local law (whichever is higher), is allowed to use or access the website.

https://legal.lemmy.world/tos/#introduction

Curious choice

[–] skullgiver@popplesburger.hilciferous.nl 49 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Dealing with data protection laws surrounding children is a MASSIVE pain. Most Lemmy servers ignore the GDPR safely, but ignoring COPPA is a bit harder. And that doesn't even take into account the recent rise of laws blocking teenagers from social media, with varying ages and consent laws.

[–] Maalus@lemmy.world 21 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

"safely" as in are too small for the regulatory bodies to care. Takes one report though.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com 27 points 11 hours ago

It's legal boilerplate.

[–] mmddmm@lemm.ee 14 points 11 hours ago

There's probably some law that require it.

[–] Skunk@jlai.lu 48 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Bans are for adults, you gets sent to your room.

[–] jared@mander.xyz 13 points 9 hours ago

After you take out the trash.

[–] End0fLine@midwest.social 32 points 11 hours ago (5 children)

I’m too old for this to matter, but is somebody really expected check the ToS of the server the community they’re posting in is on, or is this just a CYA kind of thing?

Federation makes this untenable.

[–] unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de 26 points 11 hours ago

Yeah just ignore and move on. They probably just put that there so they dont get sued for making porn available to minors without warning or something.

[–] empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com 15 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

is somebody really expected check the ToS of the server the community they’re posting in is on,

Technically yes. Practically nobody does.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] skullgiver@popplesburger.hilciferous.nl 13 points 10 hours ago (12 children)

Yes, unless you accept the risk of being banned. Every community and every server has its own set of rules.

You can usually safely ignore these rules, but if you get banned you don't have a leg to stand on if you didn't bother with reading the rules.

load more comments (12 replies)
[–] sag@lemm.ee 5 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

So, I am gonna check TOS of every instance wherever I am posting?

[–] Kichae@lemmy.ca 12 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

You should understand the rules of the places you are posting to, yes.

This is why "let's pretend this is centralized social media and ignore the fact that we're all on different websites" is a bad idea, actually. You don't get to parachute into someone else's house and expect the rules of your own home apply.

[–] sag@lemm.ee 8 points 9 hours ago

I read the rule of community and instance but not TOS.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] deegeese@sopuli.xyz 28 points 9 hours ago

Why is Kit on instance X gatekeeping a user in instance Y from accessing a community on instance Z?

Gives me vibes of old man yelling at kids to stop having fun.

[–] Irelephant@lemm.ee 26 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago) (1 children)

Imagine this, but with email.

[–] lambalicious@lemmy.sdf.org 15 points 7 hours ago

This meme could have been an email!

[–] ocean@lemmy.selfhostcat.com 25 points 5 hours ago (4 children)

Why would you ever admit your age online?

[–] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 11 points 5 hours ago (2 children)
[–] lemmydividebyzero@reddthat.com 9 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

If 16 is too young for Lemmy, 92 is unfortunately too old.

I'm sorry, but if you can't use it during the first 17 years of your life, you shouldn't be allowed to use it during the last 17 years either!!!!!!!11 Rules are rules...

[–] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 5 points 5 hours ago

Oh, ok. I'll be sure to stop using when I'm 134 years old. Just to rule out the last 17 years.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 8 points 4 hours ago (4 children)

I'm not 23. Nobody likes you when you're 23.

[–] HailSeitan@lemmy.world 5 points 2 hours ago

And you still act like you’re in freshman year

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] joyjoy@lemm.ee 17 points 5 hours ago (1 children)
[–] sunzu2@thebrainbin.org 5 points 2 hours ago

Easy there, Karen.

[–] Madbrad200@sh.itjust.works 14 points 1 hour ago

young padawan, the first lesson you ever learn on the internet is never admit your age until it no longer matters

[–] BackwardsUntoDawn@lemm.ee 9 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

is this like traveling to another country where the drinking age is lower

[–] Flax_vert@feddit.uk 8 points 7 hours ago

No, it's like a 19 year old being on a conference call with Americans having a beer and Americans telling him he can't because in America the law is 21

[–] MHLoppy@fedia.io 9 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

I seem to be missing some context - anyone want to fill in the rest of the class?

Edit: the image being shown to ~~lemmy users~~ everybody else is not being shown to ~~mbin users~~ ~~me and/or fedia.io users (unclear)~~ some unknown subsection of mbin users including me, so here it is for those like me: https://imgur.com/q4zuZzz

[–] TimeSquirrel@kbin.melroy.org 9 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Must be your instance. I can see it fine from kbin.melroy.org, which also uses the mbin software.

[–] MHLoppy@fedia.io 7 points 10 hours ago (4 children)

Well, now that's just discrimination :(

Weird though!

Edit: it also doesn't show for kbin.earth (which is running mbin) - I'm curious what the source of the problem is for this strange and seemingly-arbitrary minority of users https://kbin.earth/m/fediverse@lemmy.world/t/1028068/So-after-using-Lemmy-for-1-5-Years-You-are-telling

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Palladiumasteroid@piefed.social 5 points 10 hours ago

If an admin put limitations to who can or can't belong and/or interact with their server, it's their responsibility to whitelist and blacklist accordingly.

[–] sabreW4K3@lazysoci.al 5 points 9 hours ago (4 children)

Kit comes across like a dickhead from that screenshot.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›