this post was submitted on 29 Apr 2025
177 points (99.4% liked)

LinkedinLunatics

4399 readers
304 users here now

A place to post ridiculous posts from linkedIn.com

(Full transparency.. a mod for this sub happens to work there.. but that doesn't influence his moderation or laughter at a lot of posts.)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 31 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Thrickles@lemm.ee 73 points 7 hours ago (2 children)
[–] dulcetsunshine@lemmy.blahaj.zone 16 points 5 hours ago

Perfect. Thank you.

[–] RedSnt@feddit.dk 4 points 5 hours ago

Just in time for spring cleaning. Thanks.

[–] slaacaa@lemmy.world 70 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago) (2 children)

I’m wondering which of these 2 options is true for the chief techbro who came up with this:

  1. They are genuinely clueless, and have never used ChatGPT for more than 5 minutes
  2. They know the limitations of LLMs well, but they want to ride the AI hype to inflate their company value (and maybe cut some costs by downsizing)
[–] dwemthy@lemmy.world 42 points 7 hours ago

They believe in infinite growth. They think LLMs are going to get reliable fast. LLMs have probably played a direct role in convincing them of that

[–] makyo@lemmy.world 4 points 3 hours ago

Yep they're paying lip service to the employees but this message is 100% to potential investors looking to bet on the AI wave.

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 35 points 7 hours ago

Humans-last

[–] fuckwit_mcbumcrumble@lemmy.dbzer0.com 33 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

For the first time ever, teaching as well as the best human tutors is within our reach.

No it fucking isn't. The video calls are awful and don't do anything to help you learn why what you said is wrong. Lilly just acts confused and ignores what you said. And in their normal explanations it just assumes why you didn't know something, gives an answer for what it guessed, and doesn't do anything else. The old explanations were much better than the new garbage they offer.

[–] rickyrigatoni@lemm.ee 2 points 4 hours ago

That's pretty on point for the kind of stereotypical girl lily is supposed to be.

[–] Sterile_Technique@lemmy.world 27 points 4 hours ago (2 children)

I was gonna say language learning is actually one of the few AI might be useful for, but they're not talking about making their users learn with a little AI translator having a random conversation with them; they're replacing their workforce with AI.

Fuck. I was considering using Duo once I finish school to give myself some more options to flee the US as we dive deeper into nazism. Any good alternatives?

[–] QueenMidna@lemmy.ca 6 points 3 hours ago

Language Transfer, lingodeer

[–] BedSharkPal@lemmy.ca 5 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

They already have AI driven conversations if you pay.

[–] Sterile_Technique@lemmy.world 8 points 4 hours ago

Which is about the extent AI could benefit a service like Duolingo. Gutting their workforce isn't going to make it any better.

[–] PDFuego@lemmy.world 25 points 8 hours ago

I haven't used the app for a while, but I still have it installed. The delete account button doesn't work, and neither does the feedback button. Cool.

[–] djsoren19@lemmy.blahaj.zone 20 points 7 hours ago

Glad I finished my first Dutch unit just to get the basics and am deleting the app today. It feels like a real condemnation of the state of modern AI that I don't trust a large language model with languages.

[–] piefood@feddit.online 16 points 5 hours ago

I was using Khan Academy when they went to AI. Suddenly my answers were being marked as incorrect, even though they matched the "correct" answer presented. Or they were marked incorrect becuase I used pi, when it said I could answer in terms of pi.

I'm expecting the same to happen here.

[–] rickyrigatoni@lemm.ee 16 points 4 hours ago

Honestly I was thinking of removing duo before this. It's just glorified flash cards making you memorize words associations instead of getting into how thimgs work. I still haven't gotten the rules of how verb conjugation works in Italian. Just gonna read the books I got.

[–] restingboredface@sh.itjust.works 12 points 7 hours ago (3 children)

I'm working on Spanish now with it and I have to admit it's significantly improved from the last time I used it a few years back. Fewer nonsense sentences to translate like "My bear loves your house", which was frustrating and felt so useless. There's way more listening and speaking modules, they are generally decent at speech to text, and the language pronunciation sounds more realistic with multiple very different voices.

However, I never know why I got a question wrong, and can't do anything to rectify that other than report that the AI made a mistake, which helps with their model training, but does absolutely squat for my learning. Even the more gamified exercises are just fancy tests, where you are expected to 'learn' by getting things wrong, seeing the correct answer and regurgitating it. The community forums and explanations are gone, and each module has maybe one or two example sentences that typically don't even cover the full range of content in the module.

My husband and I have a family plan, and he is a much more dedicated user than me, but I would never pay for duolingo on my own.

[–] kubica@fedia.io 18 points 7 hours ago

I left after seeing a lot of useful community suggestions completely ignored for a long time. A few months later they finally closed the community making clear they won't hear anyone. I won't bother trying to get anything from them.

[–] gramie@lemmy.ca 6 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago) (1 children)

I have found that Language Transfer is a far superior way to learn languages (including Spanish), and it's free (although I make a monthly donation)!

It is available as YouTube videos, SoundCloud MP3s, or on a very simple but effective app.

[–] pipes@sh.itjust.works 4 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

https://www.languagetransfer.org/

I think you mean this, your link is broken. I love them too and recommend them all the time (it's mostly a one guy effort actually, it's super impressive).

[–] gramie@lemmy.ca 2 points 5 hours ago

Thanks, I fixed it.

And yes, I agree that he is amazing. One guy teaching courses in Spanish, Italian, Greek, Arabic, French, German, Turkish, and Swahili!

[–] wizardbeard@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 5 hours ago

Just calling it out: The nonsense/goofy sentences were used because it was found by studies to be more effective for learning/recall.

That wasn't a flaw, just a poorly/not at all broadcasted feature.

[–] cronenthal@discuss.tchncs.de 11 points 8 hours ago

Good luck with that, I'll watch the outcome with great interest.

[–] halfapage@lemmy.world 7 points 6 hours ago

If you call your employees or customers some wacky, quirky nickname you have already lost.

[–] rayquetzalcoatl@lemmy.world 6 points 5 hours ago

Anyone had any luck getting refunded?

[–] dohpaz42@lemmy.world 3 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Are there any viable non-AI alternatives to Duolingo?

[–] Realitaetsverlust@lemmy.zip -1 points 5 hours ago

Probably not. Translation and language is perfect for AI to work on. People here may hate it, but no business in that market can afford hundreds of employees when the competition uses AI.

[–] bitwolf@sh.itjust.works 2 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

Sure they'll produce all the content they need.

But then they'll need even more resources to shift through the hallucinations.

Can anyone suggest a comparable alternative to Duolingo?

[–] edg@lemmy.world 1 points 5 hours ago

Anyon have luck getting a refund for a year subscription?

[–] FuzzChef@feddit.org 1 points 7 hours ago

He's not wrong though. I haven't read the whole post, but the fundamental change in teaching, i.e., having access to the world's knowledge in an individualized offering at a fraction of the cost for similar access before the LLM breakthrough is real.