this post was submitted on 24 Apr 2025
1490 points (99.2% liked)

Lemmy Shitpost

31150 readers
3931 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.

Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means:

-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...

If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Memes

2.Lemmy Review

3.Mildly Infuriating

4.Lemmy Be Wholesome

5.No Stupid Questions

6.You Should Know

7.Comedy Heaven

8.Credible Defense

9.Ten Forward

10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)


Reach out to

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] simplejack@lemmy.world 117 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Apple patents all sorts of weird shit. 99% of it never gets made. They just want the money from patent litigation and licensing.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] jaybone@lemmy.zip 87 points 4 days ago (8 children)

I have earbuds that don’t need to be charged and use a cable for easy connectivity and sound quality.

[–] merc@sh.itjust.works 33 points 4 days ago (21 children)

You know what's easier than a cable? No cable.

I'll give you sound quality, but the whole reason that wireless earbuds took off is the hassle of wires.

[–] dual_sport_dork@lemmy.world 24 points 3 days ago (4 children)

And also no latency. Even expensive Bluetooth headphones and earbuds have crap latency. The systems that don't are either proprietary and not widely supported (e.g. aptX) or expensive 'phones-and-dongle arrangements that must always travel in a pair and still don't compete on latency with a pair of dollar store earbuds.

[–] merc@sh.itjust.works 17 points 3 days ago

If you're listening to podcasts or music, latency doesn't really matter.

[–] NikkiDimes@lemmy.world 13 points 3 days ago (6 children)

Unless you're using them for gaming or some other interactive medium, latency doesn't really matter though. For music, latency is irrelevant and for video, your device will take care of syncing the audio and video playback so it's a non issue. Audio quality is an entirely different matter of course.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] hOrni@lemmy.world 7 points 3 days ago (2 children)

I finally went wireless a week ago. I realized their advantage when the cable on my headphones broke for a millionth time.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] jaybone@lemmy.zip 7 points 4 days ago (9 children)

I feel like I’d forget to charge them. Or drop them in a public place and not want to put them in my ears because I’m a germaphobe. I know someone who dropped theirs in a toilet.

[–] merc@sh.itjust.works 8 points 4 days ago

Yeah, it's a risk. But, there's also a risk of getting your wired earbuds cord caught on something. I've had that happen and it yanked the phone off the table and sent it crashing to the floor. I've also had the buds get yanked out of my ears multiple times.

If I lived somewhere where winters were mild, I might still use wired headphones. When you only have to worry about a t-shirt or something managing the cord isn't too bad. But, when you have to manage a hat, scarf, coat, etc. there are just too many things to get in the way of the cord.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] superkret@feddit.org 6 points 4 days ago (2 children)

The reason wireless earbuds took off is that phones with headphone jacks stopped getting made.
Consumers didn't prefer wireless earbuds. They preferred thinner and more water-resistant phones.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (17 replies)
[–] StupidBrotherInLaw@lemmy.world 22 points 4 days ago

The lost technology of the ancients is most glorious.

[–] CafecitoHippo@lemm.ee 16 points 4 days ago

Both have their pros and cons. I miss my Westone 1 IEMs that I had back in college. My buddy's dog chewed them up. They were comfortable and super light, had great sound quality, a cord that wasn't obnoxious. Not having a cord is great though too especially when I'm working. Multipoint connection is great too. I can be listening to stuff on my phone with it in my pocket, no cable getting in the way, and when I get a call on Teams, my Pixel Buds just switch over to the computer.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Grass@sh.itjust.works 70 points 4 days ago (8 children)

can they even patent that? its already a thing that made it to production on at least one brand that sells in north america and another two or more in china

[–] EndHD@lemm.ee 24 points 4 days ago

I think JBL did it and they're a well established brand

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] excral@feddit.org 55 points 4 days ago (2 children)

I just see another device to run Doom

[–] merari42@lemmy.world 23 points 4 days ago (1 children)
[–] tetris11@feddit.uk 11 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I mean the latter is just minified JavaScript, compressed and base64 encoded. The hardware is the browser, which is cheating IMO

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Psiczar@aussie.zone 26 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Just an excuse to charge more for them. Cant think of any useful reason to have a screen on the case when you have your phone with you.

[–] Duamerthrax@lemmy.world 25 points 4 days ago (4 children)

It's an excuse to keep your product in the news/review cycle. You can't just create a useful product and leave it at that. You have to constantly change shit so people are constantly talking about it. Why do you think iPhone keep switching between rounded and square edges? It's not because one style is better then the other. It's so reviewers have something to talk about. It's why commercial OSes keep getting features no one asked for. It's why car and truck bodies keep changing even though body lines have no effect on driveability.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] riodoro1@lemmy.world 22 points 4 days ago

They can’t fix their music app on the iphone. With every version this crap runs worse.

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 21 points 4 days ago (1 children)

There's not gonna be any storage on it, though at that point there could be.

[–] papalonian@lemmy.world 10 points 4 days ago (6 children)

I think the purpose of it would be to control the device the headphones are connected to, rather than be the source of the media

[–] carotte@lemmy.blahaj.zone 32 points 4 days ago (1 children)

so its basically an over-engineered version of this thing

collapsed inline mediaPicture of the buttons on old wired Apple earbuds

[–] DmMacniel@feddit.org 9 points 4 days ago

But you see, that one has wires. We aren't supposed to like wires.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Hupf@feddit.org 17 points 3 days ago (4 children)

Great, now people will buy a case to protect their case.

Oh wait, they already do

[–] BigBrainBrett2517@lemmy.world 7 points 3 days ago

Thanks. I hate it.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] fidgeting9658@lemmings.world 14 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Absolutely revolutionary creams in pants I have never before witnessed this level of utter genius before in my entire 30 some odd years of existence. I was right in front of us checks notes this entire time and we were blinded by our own hubris.

TLDR; Nature finds a way.

[–] TastyWheat@lemmy.world 14 points 4 days ago

If this ever got released, it would probably require constant phoning home and cost $400. Separately.

[–] Hyphlosion@lemm.ee 12 points 4 days ago

Not counting it as an iPod Nano if that one tunnel Breakout like game isn’t on it.

[–] DmMacniel@feddit.org 11 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)
[–] jenny_ball@lemmy.world 10 points 3 days ago (2 children)

people are going to lose and break these and it will cost than so much

[–] Slovene@feddit.nl 10 points 3 days ago

That's why the next generation earphones will be wired.

[–] peteyestee@feddit.org 8 points 3 days ago

New air pods can't be paired to them.

[–] DeadNinja@lemmy.world 9 points 2 days ago
[–] Katzelle3@lemmy.world 8 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Doesn't the Apple Watch already fulfill the function of an iPod Nano? It works with Bluetooth headphones and has 16 GB of storage you can use for music, which is a lot by iPod Nano standards.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] peteyestee@feddit.org 8 points 3 days ago (3 children)

Tbf this might be the most original thing apple has done.

[–] whyalone@lemm.ee 37 points 3 days ago (1 children)

There are tons of chinese brands that offer this type of headphones with display

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] nieminen@lemmy.world 20 points 3 days ago (3 children)

I would agree, but yet again, this is something I've seen 4 other versions of before apple gets to it.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] CrowAirbrush@lemmy.world 12 points 3 days ago

Look at JBL, i have a pair.

It's annoying af, as the screen also has controls and somehow they respond to my sweaty back (from cycling) while i locked it before i left.

[–] Tilgare@lemmy.world 7 points 4 days ago (3 children)

I mean, this wouldn't be all that stupid imo. Add some Apple watch functionality like fitness detection and easy syncing between phone and iPod Nano Buds, this would be a solid addition to a runner's arsenal leaving no need to carry your $1000 phone on a run. Suppose you could use your watch for that and leave the case at home though. But more options aren't a bad thing, not everyone has or wants a watch.

[–] Skullgrid@lemmy.world 17 points 4 days ago (2 children)

leaving no need to carry your $1000 phone on a run.

my brother in christ it's called an MP3 player.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›