this post was submitted on 19 Apr 2025
398 points (98.5% liked)

Cyberstuck

779 readers
393 users here now

A place to post your Cybertruck fails! We're here to make fun of this hunk of shit and throw as much shade as we can to that garbage bag of a human elon.

No doxxing No slurs No racism And no fucking nazis!

founded 2 months ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] TomMasz@lemmy.world 149 points 1 week ago (6 children)

How could a vehicle that may not disengage the accelerator when the brake is applied be allowed on the road????? And who at Tesla thought this was a perfectly fine feature to have?

[–] 50MYT@lemmy.world 59 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I mean.

If you delete enough people in the government department meant to check / stop these vehicle safety issues....

[–] winkerjadams@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

This came out before that started happening though?

[–] piccolo@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 week ago

Only by a few months... now you know why musk was very desperate to get that position...

[–] IphtashuFitz@lemmy.world 25 points 1 week ago (1 children)

If I was the owner I’d be reaching out to my state Attorney General at this point, and providing recordings of all communications with Tesla.

[–] Harvey656@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago

If you were the owner you wouldn't be intelligent enough to think of this.

[–] Lemmyoutofhere@lemmy.ca 16 points 1 week ago (3 children)

That’s a big reason for the “unintended acceleration” issue that plagued older Toyotas and Audis.

[–] halowpeano@lemmy.world 5 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

Nah that's been proven as bullshit. In ICE vehicles brakes will always win vs engine torque. Just think; how quickly does your car go from 0-60, and how quickly can it go from 60-0? Brakes are just more powerful than ICE engines in production cars. They have to be to meet braking distance regulations. So, even with the accelerator down and engine going full throttle, brakes should still stop a car.

Now I'm not sure about electric cars, some of them have incredible torque and are designed to use regenerative braking. The disk brakes might just be supplemental and not strong enough.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] atomicbocks@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Maybe they don’t teach this anymore but when I took drivers ed we were taught to use the left foot lightly on the brake after going through a puddle to dry the brakes… I didn’t think cars were supposed to just ignore the gas pedal when the brakes are applied.

[–] Auli@lemmy.ca 10 points 1 week ago

WTF is that? Have never heard of drying the brakes ever.

[–] piccolo@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 week ago (2 children)

You should never be using your left foot on the pedals. Also, disk brakes always are making light contact, so you have zero reason to "dry" them.

[–] Doctor_Satan@lemm.ee 9 points 1 week ago (3 children)

You should never be using your left foot on the pedals.

Unless you are driving a manual transmission.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] klemptor@startrek.website 2 points 1 week ago

Yeah they taught that when I took driver's ed in 1996. I don't know if it applies anymore.

[–] Ajen@sh.itjust.works 9 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Do you know of any vehicles that do automatically disengage the accelerator for you when you press the brakes? It sounds like the driver was pushing both the brake and accelerator pedals at the same time. Not to defend Tesla, but this one seems like it could be the owner's fault

[–] TomMasz@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago (1 children)

The original post does not mention if he was applying the brake with the other foot while still depressing the accelerator, but it seems like the accelerator on the CT is monitored by software that then controls the motors. It would explain why it kept the motors going as the brake was used. Of course, if he was using one foot to brake and the other to press the accelerator, this is totally his fault.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Nindelofocho@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Dont most vehicles do that though? I may only be driving old vehicles.

[–] AZX3RIC@lemmy.world 23 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Most vehicle disengage the accelerator when you take your foot off the gas and terrain isn't a factor.

[–] DarkSirrush@lemmy.ca 24 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

And terrain should never be a factor on if taking your foot off the accelerator disengages acceleration, and if cruise control is active, pressing the brakes should disengage acceleration immediately.

[–] tyler@programming.dev 10 points 1 week ago

Acceleration is different than the accelerator. Acceleration can happen from going down a hill, which is why the person above stated it that way.

[–] PurpleSkull@lemm.ee 58 points 1 week ago

The breaks may or may not actually stop the car - Tesla

Oh okay. Let's get back to hating on Europe and why they don't want to buy our strong and beautiful cars.

[–] Diddlydee@feddit.uk 37 points 1 week ago

More money than sense if you buy one of these death skips. Comedy fall-apart clown cars.

[–] ZMonster@lemmy.world 34 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Everyone ITT is acting like it says "may not stop". That's not what it says. Is says, "may or may not disengage THE ACCELERATOR "

Is this dumb shit pressing the accelerator AND brake at the same time???

[–] TriflingToad@sh.itjust.works 14 points 1 week ago (2 children)

my dad's old car had to do that or else it would stop at idle lol

[–] ZMonster@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago

Lol, this legit made my day.

[–] desktop_user@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 5 days ago (1 children)

electric cars shouldn't need this, they don't have cylinders to loose.

[–] TriflingToad@sh.itjust.works 2 points 5 days ago

I understand your confusion, I was talking about my dad's, now scrapped, gasoline powered car lol

[–] WoodScientist@sh.itjust.works 30 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I have zero sympathy for anyone who bought a Cybertruck, or any Tesla in the last few years. If you buy a Tesla, you are a Nazi collaborator. Accidents and vandalism are nothing. Look at what happened to Nazi collaborators after the war. That what is what you actually deserve if you buy a Tesla today.

[–] stevedice@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 week ago

Also, it's just a stupid decision. They're shitty cars.

[–] Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works 29 points 1 week ago

Lol, get fucked Cybercuck. Zero sympathy for Tesla owners.

[–] HappyFrog@lemmy.blahaj.zone 29 points 1 week ago

"Patriot Warrior" XD

[–] Doctor_Satan@lemm.ee 26 points 1 week ago (2 children)

120k and it thought I had dirt on Hillary.

Okay, can someone explain to me what the fuck this means? Is this guy just speaking gibberish? Or am I out of yet another loop?

[–] Kichae@lemmy.ca 13 points 6 days ago (1 children)

He's saying it tried to kill him.

[–] Doctor_Satan@lemm.ee 4 points 6 days ago

Ahhh... I get it. Wow. And they think people have Trump derangement syndrome?

[–] BossDj@lemm.ee 20 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The front crumpling shattered the widow?

[–] forrgott@lemm.ee 33 points 1 week ago

I heard the frame was made of weaker material to offset the weight of the body (which is utterly ass backwards). This means the shock of the impact will travel through the body instead of into and being absorbed by the frame.

So, in other words, yup, the front crumpling will shatter the windows.

[–] Gradually_Adjusting@lemmy.world 17 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I hope they all break down and work like shit so that none survive long enough for them to become coveted rarities.

[–] CarbonIceDragon@pawb.social 11 points 1 week ago

I mean, if they're shit enough, there will be a few that just end up parked in a garage for decades after a wealthy owner finds them unusable, that are then even rarer when the rest don't survive

[–] Gork@lemm.ee 12 points 1 week ago (1 children)

$30k for repairs? what the fuck

[–] IphtashuFitz@lemmy.world 25 points 1 week ago

Any vehicle with a unibody frame is effectively totaled when it gets bent/crumpled in any way.

[–] Unpigged@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 1 week ago

That front folded against a wooden railing certainly confirms the bullet proof exoskeleton things. What a pity or met wood.

[–] adarza@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 week ago

the emergency brake obviously didn't engage. the front wheel appears to still be fully-attached to the vehicle.

[–] JokeDeity@lemm.ee 5 points 1 week ago

You absolutely cannot fix stupid.

[–] Widdershins@lemmy.world 5 points 6 days ago (1 children)
[–] Jax@sh.itjust.works 0 points 6 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Not sure if this is a serious correction, brake is correct.

Edit: I think I get it?

load more comments
view more: next ›