this post was submitted on 15 Apr 2025
1037 points (99.1% liked)

Political Memes

8453 readers
1982 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

No AI generated content.Content posted must not be created by AI with the intent to mimic the style of existing images

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 49 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] toy_boat_toy_boat@lemmy.world 104 points 1 month ago (2 children)

yeah, the information age hit us before we could come up with an education age

[–] dick_fineman@discuss.online 47 points 1 month ago (2 children)

We made it way too easy for morons to get online. Folks who don't even know what a "packet" is can livestream their anus on TikTok, and capitalism is fine with that because it's "monetized".

[–] toy_boat_toy_boat@lemmy.world 25 points 1 month ago (2 children)

nobody wants to adopt my "everybody gets arch only" platform

[–] dick_fineman@discuss.online 7 points 1 month ago

No. Everyone gets Temple OS.

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 7 points 1 month ago
[–] GuyFawkes@midwest.social 4 points 1 month ago

We made it too easy for morons to find each other and unite.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 24 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

I'm pretty sure future historians are gonna end up calling this the "Misinformation Age" instead.

[–] toy_boat_toy_boat@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago (2 children)

i like it, because it's kind of ironic. the term used by the us govt is "disinformation". so calling it the "misinformation age" tracks perfectly.

[–] PlexSheep@infosec.pub 2 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Misinformation and disinformation are not the same (in German at least?).

Misinformation is when information is wrong on purpose, to misinform someone. Disinformation is when information is just wrong, like when someone said something by accident that wasn't correct.

[–] GuyFawkes@midwest.social 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

In English I look at it the opposite way:

Misinformation = MIStake or accident

Disinformation = “dissing” of information, or intentionally putting it down/lying about it

[–] toy_boat_toy_boat@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

apparently we're all just victims of English doing that stupid thing it tends to do..

https://grammarpartyblog.com/2012/03/27/a-dis-and-a-mis/

[–] GuyFawkes@midwest.social 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Well that’s clear as mud 🤣 Maybe I’ll just use “lies” instead!

[–] toy_boat_toy_boat@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

yeah.. but are they dis-lies or mis-lies? or does the story be-lie the truth? i think i need to lie down.

[–] toy_boat_toy_boat@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

i agree with your actual, literal meaning of the two words. i'm facetiously referring to a (likely urban) legend where the way to tell "shills" from the "real" conspiracy insiders is that their use of the word "misinformation" belies their ruse, as the us government only uses the term "disinformation".

[–] GuyFawkes@midwest.social 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I like it because it implies the good guys do EVENTUALLY win and set this shit right.

[–] toy_boat_toy_boat@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

you just made me do that whole "shift perspective and think of what it would mean to the winning team if the winning team are the bad guys" thing. the "war on misinformation" may well be one of overcoming ridiculous like freedom, equality, and dissent. yikes.

[–] ReallyActuallyFrankenstein@lemmynsfw.com 42 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

It really sometimes depresses me to think how far along those utopian futures we could be if we as a species didn't have to spend so much of our lives and potential counteracting bad faith sociopathic saboteurs to progress.

Maybe history is just 75% of the people mostly at a stalemate with 25% whose empathy-deficient mental illnesses give them an edge in obtaining power and resources.

[–] arrow74@lemm.ee 30 points 1 month ago

The fact that this is considered a political meme :(

[–] brianary@startrek.website 27 points 1 month ago

Whatever Happened to the World of Tomorrow? is a really good graphic novel about a kid's relationship with his dad through the lens of retrofuturism, as it gradually tarnishes, starting with the 1939 World's Fair.

I'll probably go to Expo 2025 in Osaka this year, since I'll happen to be there, but it'll be hard to maintain any real optimism.

[–] arakhis_@feddit.org 21 points 1 month ago

Id love if they cared about sources, what

[–] PalmTreeIsBestTree@lemmy.world 14 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Technology made us regress

[–] in4apenny@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Only because people misuse it. As people of Earth, born and beholden to the dirt itself, technology and science should be used to better connect ourselves with nature and help facilitate relations between all things, for the benefit of all things. Instead, we use technology and science to distance ourselves from nature, coming from the false assumption that we are somehow seperate from or above nature. It is beyond human control, always has been, and it won't be long until the relations and environment will cut those arrogant humans down to size in what they call "a catastrophe of global proportions." We are not special, unless discussing how especially weak humans are - weakness to provide food for ourselves and relying on reason and intellect is what makes special. Humans only survived as long as we have due to our ability to understand the relations of our world, and our ecological niche is to help facilitate those relations not just between people, but the mountains and the water and the birds. Instead we turn that mountain into gravel and call it "development", pollute our water by using it as coolant for a factory, silence the bird songs more and more each year, and reduce human beings into "workers." This is true whether you're right or left, capitalist or socialist, there is no "revolution" within that mindset, only continuation. Industrialism at all costs because "science will find a way" will doom us.

There is another way, a way that understands we have no right to take from mother nature. That wealth is meaningless unless you give it away. I dream of a solarpunk world where buildings are grown, where food grows literally everywhere, with massive urban metropolises that resemble rainforests, where cities are built to clean water instead of pollute it, where technology can genetically supercharge trees so that they grow solarcell leaves to power our homes, where education is exploration, where all animals have right to roam, where we understand our living biosphere so well we're able to replicate that process on other planets. Why are we even considering space travel if we don't even know how to live on our own planet? Why do we create these gadgets and gizmos only for competitive profits and not the betterment of mankind? Why do we require people to have money for food and teaching them how to obey their superiors at a workplace, instead of teaching people how to grow their own food and learning about the relations of natural things? Why aren't we investing as much into lab-grown meat as we are into killing animals? It all goes back to our attitude towards nature, and this horrible religious mindset that thinks we are god.

[–] PalmTreeIsBestTree@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

You aren’t wrong. What I said was more of a joke than truth. What I should say is: social media driven by algorithms was the biggest mistake of all.

[–] in4apenny@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 month ago

Yeah I'd put it up there with MTV reality shows of the 2000's.

[–] RambaZamba@feddit.org 10 points 1 month ago

On point 😂😭

[–] wanderwisley@lemm.ee 9 points 1 month ago (1 children)

We came so close to having the beginning of back to the future part 2. But instead, we have the second half of back to the future part 2 where Biff steals the sports almanac and Marty is unsuccessful to take it back.

[–] GuyFawkes@midwest.social 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

He really DOES resemble bad 1985 Biff, doesn’t he?

[–] wanderwisley@lemm.ee 4 points 1 month ago

I believe when they made back to the future that the character of Biff was meant to be trump.

We don't have to worry about flat Earthers anymore, they all joined Q-Anon.

[–] BeMoreCareful@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

The little angry meme man makes me happy.

[–] WrenFeathers@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

I always daydreamed life would someday look like the cover of Somewhere in time by Iron Maiden:

collapsed inline media

[–] subarctictundra@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)
[–] noli@lemmy.zip 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

2019, the good old times when we thought that line would go up instead of down

[–] FrostBlazer@lemm.ee 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Bots and bad actors; bots and bad actors.

[–] kSPvhmTOlwvMd7Y7E@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

sauce??? checkmate dumbass

[–] BastingChemina@slrpnk.net 2 points 1 month ago

This is the opposite of what a flat earther would say.

The main position of flat-earther (and the backers of conspiracy theories) is that you can't trust sources, especially official sources of course.

And if you look at things without having the official explanation you start to notice things that, in appearance, do not make sense. Like the fact that you can see farther away than the curvature of earth allows. Of course it's very easy to explain with the refractory properties of the atmosphere but can be quite difficult to demonstrate.

PS: earth is definitely round, I'm not trying the defend their theory.

[–] Wanpieserino@lemm.ee 1 points 1 month ago

We can build the above picture but why would we, you're creating tunnels where they aren't necessary.

You are robbing the people going through these tunnels from the nature and daylight around it