You will be surprised how many old people rely on health monitoring devices that use 2G to send basic data.
Technology
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related content.
- Be excellent to each other!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
- Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.
Approved Bots
Not just old people. I had a heart monitor a couple years ago that’s only made for 2G.
Alright maybe I’m getting old but that’s not the point.
When I was visiting the Caribbean they also had a lot of 2G infrastructure still operating.
It sounds like there's a really big market opportunity for somebody to make a portable transceiver that converts 2G and 3G signals into 5G...
Really really difficult to do that at scale. You don't want random companies making cell signal transceivers.
You'd be better off just replacing the 2g transceivers entirely.
While I agree with you in principle, that's a hard sell to somebody with an embedded 2G medical device.
You don't want random companies making cell signal transceivers.
Setting "companies" aside, I don't see why it couldn't be some sort of DIY project. Like, a small computer with a both a 2G and 5G modem, a set of antennas for each, and some middleware...
In fact, there are some phones that support both networks... So why couldn't a spare phone be used? They technically already have all the hardware to make it work.
A big blocker that the article surprisingly doesn't talk about is tons of IoT stuff that uses 2G and 3G. Stuff like alarm systems, emergency phones, street light control, cars etc. Here in Sweden there was recently a report that thousands of elevators have emergency phones using 2G and 3G, and if the network is shut down you would no longer be allowed to use those elevators. And since 2018 all new cars in the EU has to have eCall, which alerts emergency services on a crash. Many of these use 2G and 3G, and if it stops working the car won't pass inspection so you'll no longer be allowed to drive it.
I have a feeling we're going to regret a lot of the "From 201x all new cars have to have ibuttfuck." It's like paying to be assimilated by the goddamn Borg.
I’m in Sweden too. I was considering buying a used car made in 2023. It uses 2G/3G. It has some connected services I actually wanted to use. And well, the ecall obviously. It’s really not an old car yet, but it becomes obsolete already.
On the manufacturer’s website they say that new car models need to have 4G/5G only by 2026. And starting 2027 all cars sold must have it. 2027 is also when they expect 2G to be fully shut down in the country. This timeline makes no sense for devices with a long life span.
In the website they also say you wouldn’t fail inspection though. But honestly I don’t care too much about that, since I actually care about ecall and some other connected services.
I hope my 2023 car only have it so I can get rid of the spyware in my car. In this case obsolescence feels fine
I’m in a recovery group and someone shared how dangerous 5G was and that they have to move again because there is too much 5G in their area…. I’m still dumbfounded.
I am still baffled by these idiots after I learned how 5g works. It isn't just frequencies increases (I could see why someone might be sceptical about this one). The main difference is simply using another protocol which allows to send more bits with a single signal.
Not yet another protocol invading me brain!?? For all I know the different pattern of signal does things to my delicate nets.
I already had to contend with the fridge and garage door
If there is any thought to it, it usually goes something like "Radio is/was fine because it's kilo/megahertz, Wifi/5G is gigahertz waves of electromagnetic radiation.(?!?!)"
Could always point to the Terahertz electromagnetic radiation source plugged into their nearest lightbulb socket and ask how that doesn't hurt them.
Recovery from brain injury?
/sorry
Well 2g is good because it reaches be further doesn't it? Say if you're in the wilderness, there's a slim chance 2G might work
I live outside of a big city in the UK. Many times I can ONLY get 2G.
the 5g standard includes many frequencies, including long range 2g-like ~400Mhz ones
I'm a ham radio operator; it just feels weird hearing someone call 400 MHz "long range." Above, say, 60 MHz I wouldn't count on anything beyond line-of-sight anyway, though I suppose the lower in the UHF band you are the more likely you are to punch through leaves and such.
We switched off 3G this year in the UK and my brothers phone stopped being able to make calls. He was using a 6 year old high-end Android phone, but it was from just before the cutoff where you could turn on VoLTE (calls over 4G).
Thankfully, I had a spare phone from the next year after that to hand him, and that one could work with some hidden menu (the type you type into your dialer) hacking.
Why couldn't you turn off 3G on that old phone via that same hidden menu? Or how come the phone didn't even recognize that it can fall back to 2G...
Due to marketing b*******, most things labeled as 3G are actually 2G.So networks don't support both two and three g. Then things that are actually 3G like hspda and L.T.E are marketed as four g , so it's just very confusing between all of it. They want to shut down the 2G.Networks that are edge and gsm.And they want to shut down the one g network that's cdma. Depending on your service that could be marketed as 123 or even four g.
~~2G is also gone.~~ Edit: it's not gone just yet. Not sure why the phone didn't try to fall back to 2G.
https://www.ofcom.org.uk/phones-and-broadband/coverage-and-speeds/3g-switch-off/
The old phone was a couple years into 4G existing but before we started to send voice over it.
I assume it just wasn't in the OS-level code. It only went up to Android 11. We could have tried LineageOS but that would have required a bunch of work including wiping the phone.
Either way, we checked and the option just wasn't there.
Were they / are they on the 3 network?
If so, that's why because 3 has never had a 2G network at all ;)
alt roms often add support for volte if the phone supports 4G, because it's just a software thing
They don’t want to. Stingray devices force a phone to fall back on 2G so they can spy on it.
subsidize 4G and 5G devices and shut off 3G and just leave 2G alone for a while. It's not like it takes up that much bandwidth. A couple of hundred kilohertz is not going to make a difference on 5G.
You can get like 5 or 10 megahertz off of 3G, which actually would be something worth pulling off and moving to 5G. But the couple hundred kilohertz on 2G is just not going to make that much of a difference.
There's a lot of hidden cost associated with supporting legacy features/standards/technology
Do they have different frequencies? Require different antennas?
Are there cost implications for radios / amplifiers? Do ASICs support only newer modes? How much obsoleted / legacy HW is required?
And that's just from a manufacturer standpoint.
Are more licenses required? Or other regulatory impacts?
what benefits does 5g offer over 2g?
lower range. oh you said benefits?
Higher bandwidth
Already unable to make use of 4G's capabilities, virtually nobody feels the speed of 5G. and I'm not an average user, I'm making use of my uncapped home internet!
5g is a lot more capable and flexible compared to older generations. The main one is a massive increase in capacity, for the same frequency allocations. Compounding with this is that it can be directional. This allows several phones to use the exact same channel simultaneously, so long as they are positioned at different angles to the tower.
5g also uses more frequency bands, allowing even more data to be moved around. Unfortunately, 2g has most of the lower frequencies, higher frequencies carry more data, but have less penetration into buildings.
Finally, 5g allows for priority and context awareness. E.g. the police can have their phones prioritised, or VoIP calls given priority over video streaming. It can also trade bandwidth for range. This allows a tower to either reach further to cover a larger area, or focus down, to provide more bandwidth locally.
In theory 5g could have a similar range to 2g. However, that rarely happens. It requires it using the lower frequencies, that 2g currently uses, and well as dropping its data rate to improve range. Most of the time it's optimised for shorter range, and more towers using higher frequencies. This gives impression of a far smaller range. But give a huge increase is available bandwidth.
[Not Serious] 3 numbers more.
Ah, well, my G goes to 11
The “g” stands for generation. So it’s the 5th iteration of the technology versus the 2nd iteration. Whilst there are many improvements (speed, capacity, security etc) there are some negatives. (I believe mainly to do with signal penetration - i.e. getting a signal in basements, stone wall houses, being behind objects etc.)
Where I’m currently staying I have: 2G, edge, 4G and 5G signals available.
5g > 2g if g is positive
What if g is a complex number?
I don't believe in such trite charlatanery
"But I've learned about imaginary numbers in mathematics degree" well, that and $20 dollars will buy you an egg
Obviously Internet speed and call quality, plus there are many good technical changes under the hood, such as proper isolation of calls etc.
I think it handles congestion better and saves energy for the cell tower. It's a good choice for crowded city centres, near university campuses and train stations where many people frequent
So is the difference between 2g, 3g, 4g and 5g that they use different channels/frequencies, different communication protocols, or both?
Both, really. There's been encoding improvements every generation, but they also use different slices of the spectrum.
There's also changing from circuit to packet switching, which also drastically changes how the handover process works.
tl;Dr - handover in 5G is buggy and barely works. The whole thing of switching from one service area to another in the middle of a call is held together by hopes and dreams.
Both of those, and also different signal modulation.
Well, they shouldn't turn it off any time soon, just like they don't turn off analog radio. TV is one I can understand where turning off old methods makes sense, because people upgrade their TVs and use IPTV/SatTV/cable TV much more likely anyway.
It’s because they still have human targets out there that are only compatible with 2g. The humans haven’t gotten their 5g implants yet.
Well I got the Covid vaccine. I’m screwed I am 5g already.