this post was submitted on 06 Mar 2025
55 points (98.2% liked)

Ask Lemmy

29436 readers
1338 users here now

A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions


Rules: (interactive)


1) Be nice and; have funDoxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them


2) All posts must end with a '?'This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?


3) No spamPlease do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.


4) NSFW is okay, within reasonJust remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either !asklemmyafterdark@lemmy.world or !asklemmynsfw@lemmynsfw.com. NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].


5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions. If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email info@lemmy.world. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.


6) No US Politics.
Please don't post about current US Politics. If you need to do this, try !politicaldiscussion@lemmy.world or !askusa@discuss.online


Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.

Partnered Communities:

Tech Support

No Stupid Questions

You Should Know

Reddit

Jokes

Ask Ouija


Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 20 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Toes@ani.social 27 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I'd imagine it's because it's a hobby project for the admin. It can be a pita to keep on top of stuff like this.

[–] crawancon@lemm.ee 4 points 4 days ago (2 children)
[–] Mee@reddthat.com 3 points 4 days ago (2 children)
[–] jet@hackertalks.com 8 points 3 days ago

Unless there is a compelling feature, or security issue, there is no rush to upgrade. Let the bugs get ironed out

[–] crawancon@lemm.ee 5 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

in general, the user population is not very well concerned over the sub version of the instance they are using. that is an admin function and worry.

[–] LandedGentry@lemmy.zip 2 points 4 days ago

What do you mean?

[–] mp3@lemmy.ca 19 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Some instances like lemmy.world values stability over bleeding edge, and 0.19.3 has been stable for them. They do plan to upgrade to something newer eventually, it's just that every migration carries a risk of something going wrong.

[–] gigachad@sh.itjust.works 6 points 3 days ago

I remember we had some version a year ago (was it 0.18?) that made the whole lemmyverse unreliable. Federation was completely fucked, inage upload was buggy... some instances needed weeks for repairing the damage.

Yeah I used to upgrade immediately but there were always just a few bugs. Now I wait a couple months before taking the plunge

[–] Dave@lemmy.nz 18 points 3 days ago

People who did upgrade would have found regressions in several of those versions.

We're on 0.19.8 so just one version behind that I need to get around to updating, but before that there were a string of versions with known issues.

Lemmy is not even version 1 yet, it's risky to update to a new version straight away.

[–] BenDoubleU@lemmy.radio 15 points 4 days ago

If I remember right, there was a pretty big change in how pictrs(photo management) worked with lemmy after 0.19.3. There were a few breaking changes and Postgres updates that would take an instance down for a while as well. Not sure if that’s the reason why but it made my instance stay on 0.19.3 for longer than it should have.

[–] Lasherz12@lemmy.world 13 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

I imagine it's similar to an enterprise not using Windows update. If it's stable and no exploits have been identified then why rock the boat?

[–] Mee@reddthat.com 1 points 3 days ago

On windows you got a enterprise or LTS equivalent to get the important updates.

You don't get that on Lemmy.

[–] Blaze@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 4 days ago (3 children)

Beehaw still on 0.18.3 (they just announced they are going to upgrade though)

[–] sorghum@sh.itjust.works 6 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I thought they said they were moving to a different platform?

[–] Dave@lemmy.nz 2 points 3 days ago

They plan to move to sublinks, but it's still in development. So they said they will update to the latest version and also planning to update to 1.0 when released (planned for later this year) because their members are having trouble with apps etc after breaking changes.

There's an update post here: https://beehaw.org/post/18771220

Yeah I gave up on them because of that and the realization that I don't want my content censored

[–] Mee@reddthat.com 4 points 4 days ago (1 children)

0.18.3? That got released at 2023-07-28?

That is really bad for the Lemmy instances.

[–] Blaze@sopuli.xyz 2 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)
[–] tal@lemmy.today 3 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

In the past, there have been some pretty unpleasant regressions.

My own home instance, lemmy.today, had some time where it was more-or-less unusable, because every release for a while had some new regression. The lemmy.world guys were a lot more conservative, just backported some critical fixes and waited for a while after each new release to wait and see if problems showed up. They didn't crash into the regressions.

Granted, some of this could probably be picked up by better automated testing. But to some extent, I think that for at least big instances, it's good to hold off, wait, and see if a new release has a bunch of issues.

Also, my understanding is that at least for some (all?) past updates, there's no downgrade path. Once you upgrade, you're committed.

Maybe you can back up the instances and restore them, but I suspect that that may break state across instances, since you'd get instances with conflicting views of what's on an instance.