this post was submitted on 10 Apr 2025
447 points (96.7% liked)

memes

15529 readers
3029 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/AdsNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live.

A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment

Sister communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

by Centurii-chan

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] paranoia@feddit.dk 79 points 2 months ago (3 children)

both of these were designed by architects. neither reflects the twin simplicity and laziness that engineering embodies.

[–] CelloMike@lemmy.world 84 points 2 months ago (7 children)

If engineers had our way all buildings would look like this

collapsed inline media

This is the ideal building. You may not like it but this is what peak performance looks like πŸ˜†

[–] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 10 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Why not continue the brick shell at least to eye level? Why does it stop at waist level?

[–] paranoia@feddit.dk 34 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Brick expensive :(

panel cheap :)

[–] grue@lemmy.world 9 points 2 months ago (2 children)

The real question is, why is there any brick at all?

(The answer is almost certainly that somebody other than the engineer imposed the requirement.)

[–] AllYourSmurf@lemmy.world 23 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Brick waterproof.

Brick termite-proof.

Brick fireproof.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Panel same (probably, depending what kind of panel).

[–] anomnom@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 months ago

No, panel only as waterproof as the coating protecting it. Brick is rock, takes centuries to wear out.

[–] myrrh@ttrpg.network 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

...masonry wainscots look tacky-as-heck but they provide impact and moisture resistance where it's needed most...

[–] grue@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Is masonry really cheaper than using a slightly thicker gauge of steel and a decent epoxy paint for the bottom few feet?

[–] myrrh@ttrpg.network 5 points 2 months ago

...it's far more durable, mostly...

[–] Kusimulkku@lemm.ee 8 points 2 months ago

Brick? Pfft. Concrete elements all the way. There's no equal.

[–] RubberElectrons@lemmy.world 7 points 2 months ago

Dogshit R-factor, poor impact resistance, I mean that's the obvious stuff lol

Peak performance is highly dependent on who's defining it 😝

This is what's known in the Midwest as "tornado bait"

[–] Pilon23@feddit.dk 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Mind explaining why this is peak performance? ELI5 if possible

[–] CelloMike@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Engineers love these things because they're real easy to design, and very efficient in usable volume vs materials (which is why they're used for every warehouse/big store/factory)

Obviously not great for living in or anything but that's the joke :)

[–] Pilon23@feddit.dk 1 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Very interesting! I never thought of that before. On the building pictured, which would take least effort to double the storage space - making it twice as long, wide or tall?

[–] CelloMike@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

Twice as long - all the structural elements are the same, you just line up more of them

[–] grue@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Do you really mean "effort" (and if so, whose?) or do you mean cost? The other reply is correct that making it twice as long would minimize the need to redesign, but without doing the math (I am a civil engineer, but I can't be bothered) I suspect making it twice as tall would use the least additional materials and therefore be cheapest. (That assumes taking advantage of the extra height for storage is the client's problem, not the engineer's. Having to put in a second story floor would change things.)

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Wanpieserino@lemm.ee 1 points 2 months ago

My neighbour shop looks exactly like that. It went bankrupt cuz it's ugly as fuck

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] zout@fedia.io 18 points 2 months ago (2 children)

As an engineer, I prefer to call it minmalism.

Quick edit: I saw the typo, but it is also an example of what the sentence is supposed to convey.

[–] surewhynotlem@lemmy.world 14 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Look. i's ain't cheap, and half the readers won't even use it.

Leave it out, we'll claim it was a mistake, and if anyone really complains we can add it back later.

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Are you kidding. Just slap an extra 20% of the is you think you used on the end in case.

[–] surewhynotlem@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

That's positvely genus!ii

I go with "efficiency"

[–] GorGor@startrek.website 11 points 2 months ago

hey! I resemble those remarks!

[–] kryptonianCodeMonkey@lemmy.world 37 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Surely that second building is AI generated or something right? Surely physics would not allow such a monstrosity, nor would any city approve it... right?

[–] Dragonstaff@leminal.space 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I'm not sure it exists. I spent three whole minutes on Google and can't find it. I'd expect it to be fairly famous if real.

I'm not sure Y anyone would build it, but I do think we could figure a way to build it safely if someone wanted to throw enough money at it.

[–] Spezi@feddit.org 3 points 2 months ago

Its fictional, I found an article

[–] AnAverageSnoot@lemmy.ca 21 points 2 months ago (1 children)

The first building looks like it's a female connector for a high throughput cable of some kind.

[–] DaddleDew@lemmy.world 32 points 2 months ago (4 children)

Looks like a German bunker on Omaha Beach to me

[–] kamenlady@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago

For me it's cylons.

[–] francis_milesaway@lemm.ee 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

I believe it's in Guernsey, C.I.

ed: it's a German WW2 coastal naval range finding tower. Used for fire control of coastal guns shooting 25 miles out to sea.

[–] SaharaMaleikuhm@feddit.org 1 points 2 months ago

Brutalist architecture in a nutshell

[–] passenger@lemm.ee 20 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

What buildings are these?

Can't believe no-one asked yet

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 18 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

The bottom one looks scary as fuck. I don't want to be in or around that thing if it was real.

[–] wreckedcarzz@lemmy.world 12 points 2 months ago

BUT WITH THE POWER OF FLEX TAPE

[–] Spacehooks@reddthat.com 7 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] AlligatorBlizzard@sh.itjust.works 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)

For a drainage engineer, he's shockingly bad with sluices in Timberborn, lol.

[–] Spacehooks@reddthat.com 2 points 2 months ago

It was those architecture beavers!

Realcivilengineer is that you?

[–] toiletobserver@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

They're the same picture

load more comments
view more: next β€Ί