this post was submitted on 09 Mar 2025
1 points (53.3% liked)
No Stupid Questions
38711 readers
829 users here now
No such thing. Ask away!
!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.
The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:
Rules (interactive)
Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.
All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.
Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.
Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.
Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.
Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.
Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.
That's it.
Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.
Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.
Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.
Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.
On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.
If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.
Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.
If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.
Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.
Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.
Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.
Let everyone have their own content.
Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here. This includes using AI responses and summaries.
Credits
Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!
The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Why would I be aware? I have a life outside the internet
Call me Lenny/Leni/shinigamiookamiryuu is the "Triagonal" person. Check the profile and there's a link to the Triagonal account in the bio.
The point being that doesn't square well with the original verdict.
Shut up lol
I can't point out conflicts of interest?
I just don't even really understand what you're saying mate - an adult is creepily trying to get with a child in the screenshots, and you're talking about something else. What are you trying to say?
Call me Lenny/Leni is the "Triagonal" person making comments to the child in the screenshots. Click on Call me Lenny/Leni's profile and there's a link to the Triagonal account in the bio.
collapsed inline media
That there is more to the context than what you see (not to mention it happened years ago with any amends that needed to be made having been made, the kind of thing pictures wouldn't show) and that the person you initially were responding to who is trying to spread around the claims "about Triagonal" has been a part of an ongoing harassment/stalking/slandering campaign against the people they're referring to, which is what I was alluding to.
The last two pictures portray things that took place in response to other things. The other person in the first one only got upset because she was recommending something far more NSFW and someone missed a beat when a second thing was suggested which didn't have any inherently non-platonic-related undertones. Same with the picture after it. Everyone was throwing loose answers out there in response to a joke thread about an art phenomenon, and there was only one pairing not taken up.
The first picture's vagueness aside, it's amazing anyone takes someone's word for plain grey text on a plain white backdrop that portrays something you'd expect to be impossible if the individual doing it is banned from that place for whatever reason they got banned for. It's the equivalent of accusing someone of writing their own name on a bathroom wall when the accused person has been dead for a month. Is gullibility just the modus operandi for fediverse revolutionaries?