this post was submitted on 05 Apr 2025
60 points (92.9% liked)
/r/50501 Mirror
961 readers
585 users here now
Mirrored /r/50501 Popular Posts
founded 2 months ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Yep. But maybe 1939 would have been more appropriate.
I don't want to be pedantic, but it seems 1933 is the year with the closest analogy to what you intend, since thats the year the Nazis took power.
1939 would be when WWII kicked off for Europe. I guess one could say the next World War is cooking off, but I don't think thats what OP intends to be commenting on.
~~1940~~ 1941 is when the US was dragged into WWII......I guess i would say that's the year that put the World in World War II....Uh, but yeah, gonna have to hard disagree that we're there yet.
I mean yeah, I'm aware, but it's Trump second mandate. And he already tried a coup... My interpretation was that OP was referring the beginning of the 3rd World War. Maybe we're not there yet on a military level, but there's definitively an economic war ongoing and at the speed things are going, chances are he will try ton annex Groenland (think Poland) before the end of the year. We're only 3 months in...
I guess I could see that argument.
If I understand correctly, 1938/39 is when Japan started getting frisky with Manchuria / Northwest China, to which Chinese immigrants / Chinese heritage Americans on the US west coast demanded action by the US government, which then caused the US to stop selling steel and other industrial goods to Japan, effectively starting a trade war.
I don't think I agree with your conclusion, but I def see the logical basis and how it relates to current world events.
I wish I'm wrong but this administration keeps adding fuel to the fire every damn day.
Also, I agree with the early 30s estimation
Derp, my bad, yeah I'll fix that in my comment.