FiftyFiftyOne

joined 4 months ago
 

collapsed inline media

collapsed inline media

collapsed inline media

collapsed inline media

I have the more...explicit ones from the episode, but I fear Reddit/mods will remove them. Dm me is you want the link. Let them sue for our freedom of speech


Originally Posted By u/SudoPhoenix At 2025-07-24 10:21:30 PM | Source


 

🚨 PSA: Trump’s New Executive Order Doesn’t Technically Make Homelessness Illegal, But Here’s Why It Feels Like It Does

I just spent time breaking down the July 24, 2025 Executive Order titled “Ending Crime and Disorder on America’s Streets” from the White House website, and I’m deeply disturbed.

Let’s talk about what it actually does, what it pretends not to do, and why it feels like punishment for being poor.


🔍 TL;DR:

Being homeless is not made explicitly illegal.

But the EO strongly encourages cities and states to remove homeless people from public spaces, or lose federal funding.

It pushes for involuntary treatment (civil commitment) and cuts housing-first programs proven to reduce homelessness.

If you're poor, sleeping outside, or suspected of mental illness, you can be detained, institutionalized, and denied a say in the matter.

All of this is done without passing a new law, just via executive power and a recent Supreme Court ruling that green-lit criminalizing public camping.


🧠 What does the Executive Order actually do?

Directs federal agencies to cut support for “Housing First” (programs that give people housing without preconditions like sobriety or job status).

Instead funds cities and states that:

Enforce public camping bans, loitering laws, or “vagrancy” ordinances.

Promote civil commitment, i.e., forced institutionalization for people judged to have mental illness or substance issues.

Encourages policies that push people into treatment or jail even if they aren’t committing any crime, just for being poor, unsheltered, or visibly distressed.


⚖️ Isn’t that unconstitutional?

You’d think so. But here’s what changed:

🧑‍⚖️ Supreme Court: City of Grants Pass v. Johnson (June 2024)

Ruled that cities can ban camping in public, even if no shelter is available.

As long as they target actions (like sleeping outside) and not status (being homeless), it’s now legal.

This overturned years of protections for the homeless.

So now, local laws can fine, arrest, or displace people just for existing in public with no alternatives.


🧱 What is “civil commitment”?

It’s when someone is:

Detained and sent to a mental health or addiction facility without consent.

Based on someone else (like police or a social worker) saying they can’t care for themselves.

Often has no trial, limited rights, and no clear release timeline.

This EO incentivizes states to do this to homeless people rather than offering housing or community care.


🩻 But what are these “programs” like?

That’s the scary part, we don’t know yet.

There are no federal standards, no promised oversight, and no guarantees of humane conditions. It echoes the failed institutional systems of the 1900s: warehousing the mentally ill, abuse, neglect, and permanent confinement.


💬 Why this feels like cruel and unusual punishment:

You can be detained for merely existing in public while poor.

Your mental state can be judged on the street, and you can be taken against your will.

You may have no voice, no trial, no exit plan.

The government calls it help — but it’s closer to punishment for not having money, housing, or access to healthcare.


🛑 But how is this even legal?

Because:

  1. Executive orders don't require Congress, they direct federal agencies on how to spend money or enforce rules.

  2. The courts have upheld broad use of executive power.

  3. This EO doesn’t create a new law, it just redirects federal dollars to cities that punish homelessness.

It’s legal, but it’s not ethical. And it’s starting to look more like decrees than democratic governance.


🧭 So what now?

Know your rights, and help others do the same.

Support legal challenges from ACLU, National Homelessness Law Center, and others.

Contact your representatives to push back on this abuse of executive power.

Raise awareness, because many people still don’t realize what’s happening here.

This isn’t about public safety. It’s about disappearing the poor from view, by force, without consent, and without care.


🔗 Link to the Executive Order down 👇

link 🔗

https://www.whitehouse.gov/fact-sheets/2025/07/fact-sheet-president-donald-j-trump-takes-action-to-end-crime-and-disorder-on-americas-streets/

Let’s not stay silent about this. It sets a terrifying preceden

🇺🇸 Bill of Rights – Pocket Summary

  1. Free Speech & Religion – Speak, worship, press, assemble, protest.
  2. Guns – Right to bear arms.
  3. No Quartering – No forced housing of soldiers.
  4. Searches – No searches without a warrant.
  5. Remain Silent – No self-incrimination, double jeopardy, or unfair taking.
  6. Speedy Trial – Fast, fair trial with a lawyer and witnesses.
  7. Jury in Civil Cases – Right to jury in money/property disputes.
  8. No Cruel Punishment – No torture, no extreme bail/fines.
  9. People’s Rights – You have more rights than what’s listed here.
  10. States’ Rights – Powers not given to the feds belong to states/people.

Originally Posted By u/360Picture At 2025-07-24 09:39:07 PM | Source


 

There's this dude, Rich Logis, who founded the group "Leaving MAGA" after he left the cult in 2021. Having looked into him, he definitely isn't some grifter. He's been putting in some really hard work to proactively create a space where like-minded individuals can meet to explore their doubts without judgement and with a positive path forward.

When someone has been hooked by a cult, the cracks in their belief will come and go, like a slowly flickering light. Very occasionally, they might find themselves in a headspace where they are willing to think critically about their own lives, challenge their beliefs, ask the question "what if I'm wrong?"

Rick has been saving up to plant a "Leaving MAGA" billboard right smack in front of Mar-a-Lago. It's due to go up tomorrow, but he hasn't hit his $1.4k goal yet.

I say we help him get there. Why?

  1. Having a visible off-ramp in sight can be the difference between a journey of self-discovery and going right back to your old habits.

  2. it would be FUCKING hilarious


Originally Posted By u/QuantumLettuce2025 At 2025-07-24 08:50:07 PM | Source


 

Originally Posted By u/transcendent167 At 2025-07-24 10:44:29 PM | Source


 

source of the image: https://www.thedailybeast.com/never-before-seen-photos-of-trump-and-epstein-unearthed/


Originally Posted By u/awolfwearingabanana At 2025-07-24 06:54:22 PM | Source


 

This is the END, time for the revolution to remove and jail this entire Administration.

Executive Order

ACLU Condemns Trump Executive Order Targeting Disabled and Unhoused People


Originally Posted By u/Klutzy_Gazelle_6804 At 2025-07-24 06:32:19 PM | Source


 

collapsed inline media


Originally Posted By u/Snapdragon_4U At 2025-07-24 06:19:16 PM | Source


 

Average people are just one or two paychecks away from homelessness.
This could be any one of us. Instead of fixing the economy and having billionaires and companies pay their fair share (and better wages) the government is trying to send homeless people into camps. It’s a crime to just exist now.

This is so they can farm out the newly imprisoned homeless as slave labor.
"Oh they're just going to place them in homes and shelters to get the help."

News flash: there's nowhere near enough beds in shelters. There's absolutely not enough low income housing.


Originally Posted By u/Ok-Amphibian3164 At 2025-07-24 07:19:11 PM | Source


 

collapsed inline mediaVideo


Originally Posted By u/Extra_Place_1955 At 2025-07-24 06:23:37 PM | Source


 

collapsed inline mediaVideo


Originally Posted By u/Limp_Fig6236 At 2025-07-24 12:37:23 PM | Source


 

I posted a comment under a fascist apologist saying "We used to punch nazis in the face", and it was "[ Removed by Reddit ]" within minutes.


Originally Posted By u/Zetch88 At 2025-07-24 01:03:20 PM | Source


 

The POTUS certainly isnt going to like finding out about last night's season premiere.

South Park creators just pulled a 4D chess move on the POTUS.

The recent Skydance Media–Paramount Global merger lit a fire under the South Park creators. Add to that the questionable cancellation of Colbert and CBS settling behind the scenes, and all feels like a powder keg that finally blew up in this premiere.

And then there's the irony: South Park just sold these new episodes to Paramount, and now Paramount’s own network is airing New Saddam’s tiny peen. That alone is hilarious.

I honestly can't wait to see how much Saddam (Trump) tries to sue them for today. The episode feels like it’s daring him to try.

That final scene with Jesus was something else:

"If you take bribes, break the law, and sue, Saddam can do anything then—even Jesus can’t stop it. He will end South Park, so eat the fucking bread."

Even Paramount got name dropped 🫳.
They just signed a $1.5 billion contract, and it feels like they’re more than ready to spend every cent defending their free speech. This episode might just be the opening shot in a wild season.


Originally Posted By u/Ok-Amphibian3164 At 2025-07-24 11:21:06 AM | Source


view more: next ›