this post was submitted on 06 Dec 2025
1232 points (98.6% liked)

Lemmy Shitpost

35952 readers
4670 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.

Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means:

-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...

If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Memes

2.Lemmy Review

3.Mildly Infuriating

4.Lemmy Be Wholesome

5.No Stupid Questions

6.You Should Know

7.Comedy Heaven

8.Credible Defense

9.Ten Forward

10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)


Reach out to

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ApathyTree@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

They’re free to go live in the wilderness, with no roads, no fire department, no water or electricity, no services whatever, and find out how much they’re actually benefiting from our collective.

Where?

This is what I want to do, but I can’t afford to buy land on which to do it (and not just any land is useful for this either, it needs to be capable of supporting people before you can count it). Land enough to support a small homestead isn’t cheap, and zoning/local laws often restricts what you can do on it. So for example you may buy land, but not be allowed to drill a well, even if you have the means and knowledge to do so. Or if you buy land you can afford, you may not be allowed to build a permanent structure on it at all.

You’ll get kicked out (and possibly fined) of both state and national parks in the US if they find you “permanently camping”, which they are likely to do since there are frequently people out there. The only other option is squatting on private property. If you get caught before whatever time passes for squatters laws to take effect, you lose everything you’ve built up.

I mean don’t get me wrong, I don’t mind paying for things I’ll never use because it makes society as a whole better. All I’m saying is opting out of living in a society is nearly impossible for most people even if they are ok with not having all the stuff society funds like roads and fire control.

[–] LillyPip@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

Search off-grid properties. They exist.

For the downvoters, here are some in the US:

https://www.landsearch.com/off-grid/united-states

Plenty of gorgeous listings.

And in Australia:

https://www.realestate.com.au/news/for-sale-australias-best-offgrid-properties/

Some very beautiful places, and also some very cheap.

Or Iceland:

https://www.bluehomes.com/buy-secluded-Iceland/ISL/10AL/AL/en/theme3.html

Or Siberia?

https://farmlands-agency.com/

[–] ApathyTree@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Yes I know, I’ve looked at them. That’s how I know they are quite expensive.

[–] LillyPip@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

But you never have to pay for utilities, rent, taxes for schools or roads or services … obviously it wouldn’t be completely free to purchase the land.

[–] ApathyTree@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Ok, but if your plan is to live solo forever and not interact with society, you’d basically need to pay for it upfront. That means you need a lot of money all at once, otherwise you’ll still need income, which limits the ability you have to be separate from society.

[–] LillyPip@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Yes, that would need to be the plan. One upfront payment then never paying for utilities or other things forever. That’s the only way this works. You don’t need income, because you live on rabbits and fish and your garden. If your house burns, you put it out with buckets from your stream. You build your house yourself by cutting down trees.

If you get sick, you either die or you don’t.

I think this is madness, but that’s how you do this.

[–] ApathyTree@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Right, and you get why this is impossible for most people? That was my original point. Most people, even if they want to do this, can’t. It’s unaffordable.

The point is that your suggestion that someone is free to do this is just very much not the case.

[–] LillyPip@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 day ago

Of course I do. And again, that’s my point.

People romanticise this, but it’s impossible for many reasons. You can easily try, but we have societies for a reason.

Everyone is free to do this, but good luck in practice. It’s not just hard, and it’s not just stupid, but why the fuck would you want this? It’s insane, and we’re not geared for this.

Life in the wilderness is not a Disney movie. It’s so ruthlessly difficult, that’s why society exists. We are stronger, safer, and happier together.

[–] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 day ago

It’s almost as if we all rely on each other to exist. If only there was a word for that.

[–] papalonian@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (2 children)

People aren't down voting because they don't think the properties exist, they're down voting because your argument doesn't really make sense. People that are saying, "I'd rather just live in the wilderness" are not the ones that can afford to just purchase land. You almost will certainly have to pay taxes on the land as well.

Saying you can not participate in society by participating in society very hard so you can afford to participate a little less and a little further from society isn't what these people are looking for, they want to hop in a truck with some tools, drive into the woods, never to be seen again. Without a million dollar piece of paper saying they're allowed to.

[–] LillyPip@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 day ago

Well yeah, I get that. But there are plots for really cheap, but they don’t have any kind of access to water, sewage, or whatever. Plots for like 10,000 or less. That sounds like a lot, I suppose, but it isn’t. I think it’s more that people don’t understand how money works,

[–] GreyEyedGhost@piefed.ca 1 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

I like how your dream of self-sufficiency starts with there being g a road you can drive on. Or do you think most woods are reasonable places for driving trucks? You'd be better off buying a donkey or mule. Worst case scenario, you'd have a bit more meat to eat before you starved.

[–] papalonian@lemmy.world 1 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

I was speaking figuratively, but if you want to be literal, I never said anything about a road, and there's many kinds of trucks that can drive over many types of terrain.

[–] GreyEyedGhost@piefed.ca 1 points 4 hours ago

The kind of truck that can handle any kinds of undeveloped forest are more expensive than the land you say is too expensive for the people who would want to do what you're saying. So, unrealistic expectations all around.