this post was submitted on 15 Nov 2025
953 points (99.5% liked)

Not The Onion

18625 readers
917 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Please also avoid duplicates.

Comments and post content must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

In August 2025, two nearly identical lawsuits were filed: one against United (in San Francisco federal court) and one against Delta Air Lines (in Brooklyn federal court). They claim that each airline sold more than one million “window seats” on aircraft such as the Boeing 737, Boeing 757, and Airbus A321, many of which are next to blank fuselage walls rather than windows.

Passengers say they paid seat-selection fees (commonly $30 to $100+) expecting a view, sunlight, or the comfort of a genuine window seat — and say they would not have booked or paid extra had they known the seat lacked a window.

As reported by Reuters, United’s filing argues that it never promised a view when it used the label “window” for a seat. According to the airline, “window” refers only to the seat’s location next to the aircraft wall, not a guarantee of an exterior view.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] arrow74@lemmy.zip 97 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

That case does at least make some sense. All meat products can contain bone due to them being from you know animals.

Basically they felt that encountering bones in a meat product is a normal, acceptable, and understood risk.

Now if he was give a plate of boneless wings and each wing was full of bones that would be a different case entirely.

This was an inadvertent bone fragment. Can happen in any meat product.

[–] yuknowhokat@lemmy.world 17 points 1 day ago (2 children)

My issue with boneless wings is that they are not Wing meat at all. They're chicken tits.

[–] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

"Hey, just callin to check in with ya! I'm sittin here with two breasts in my hands......chicken breasts! BIG HEARTY LAUGH!!!"

[–] ToastedRavioli@midwest.social 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Isnt the drumstick, which is most people’s preferred “wing”, actually the thigh part of a chicken?

[–] pyre@lemmy.world -3 points 1 day ago

no. boneless means without bones. there's no "acceptable risk" when the package says there's no risk.