264
Marjorie Taylor Greene Reportedly Plots 2028 Presidential Run as a 'Real MAGA' Republican
(www.mediaite.com)
this post was submitted on 05 Nov 2025
264 points (98.2% liked)
politics
26290 readers
2807 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
MAGA voters seem pretty unlikely to vote for women.
I mean it's a trippple doom for her. She's a woman, she's half way shedding maga siding with dem's on the epstein files, and on protecting healthcare, and she has a history of being outright crazy in multiple directions.
In short, I don't think her recent forays into sanity are going to erase the stain the R party has on it now, nor erase her claims of weather controlling machines and space lasers to earn any support from the left.
Then to court maga... obviously they'd need to be less sexist, and she'd need to seem more... on trumps side.
I think AOC's comment is probably right, she got snubbed for senate seat by trump... and now she's pissed and wanting to break that glass ceiling.
Newsom/Greene 2028, lmao (please let this be a joke!)
DNC: "THATS A FUCKING BRILLIANT IDEA"
if this turns out to be true, I will hate you.
in the mean time, this got a chuckle.
If there’s any organization that we can count on to snatch defeat from the jaws of victory it’s the DNC
She is crazy enough, however, to make a big stink if Trump doesn't step aside and let her have a crack at the Presidency.
Her insanity and bigotry syncing up with some key issues isn't "sanity". It's random chance.
I can give that on Isreal, she takes anti-semitism without the caveat of "except the ones that are in power commiting a genocide". The release the epstein files, and protect healthcare, is either she's actually concerned about helping people or punishing bad guys... or she's just pissed off with something in her party and is playing a contrarian to get something she wants (which yeah, I'd lean more towards the second, but general bigotry doesn't quite explain those 2).
I think you're underestimating the potential power of "vote for a woman to own the libs and show them we're not sexist. They're stupid!"
They'd be faster to transvestigate her first
Sadly, I think the only way we get a female president is if all candidates are female. AOC vs. MTG would be a good history maker.
Disagree. For one, it'd be an underwhelming point as a historic marker if it's the only option. And two, we haven't gotten a female president yet cuz the women we keep running are shit candidates. Sexism is absolutely a factor, but I don't think it compares to the absolute fuckton of baggage (actual or perceived - doesn't matter) that comes with Hillary, or Harris's last minute embrace of Israel's genocide.
We haven't actually tried running a woman who's also a decent human being. AOC would wipe the floor with her opponent's face, regardless of that opponent's gender.
Eh, it doesn't have to be the most stupendous, amazing victory for women to be important and good. Two female candidates would still be a huge deal, assuming proper primaries were conducted. That said, I would be astounded if the Republican nominee is a woman any time soon.
Yeah, fair enough.
And who fuckin knows on the Republican nominee... I'm sure if MTG says enough slurs, or stomps on enough puppies, or shoots enough kindergartens, etc, on live TV the republican voter base could be persuaded to overlook the fact that she's a woman. She's already got behaving like a fucking dumbass down to a science, and the R's love that shit, so... as Republican standards go for presidential material go, she checks a lot of the boxes.
The one flaw in an otherwise brilliant plan.