this post was submitted on 18 Mar 2025
517 points (99.2% liked)

News

28317 readers
4125 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Tesla board members and executives have sold over $100 million in stock since early February as the company's shares decline.

Board member James Murdoch sold $13 million in stock on March 10, coinciding with Tesla's worst single-day drop in five years.

Kimbal Musk sold $27 million in shares last month, and board chair Robyn Denholm offloaded over $75 million through a predetermined plan.

The sell-offs come as Tesla’s stock has fallen nearly 50% since December.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 146 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (3 children)

The wise ones sold as much stock as possible.
Tesla stock is most likely to drop way more. Global sales being down about 50% for February, demands the stock must fall even more.
Even corrupt government contracts can't compensate for the loss of global marketshare every Musk nut was so convinced would increase to a degree where Tesla would be bigger than all other car companies combined.

The stock price was always ridiculously high, and it still is.

[–] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 76 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

The P/E ratio is off the charts. Things will get really interesting after the Q1 earnings call on April 29th.

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 52 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (3 children)

I wouldn't be surprised if Tesla chooses to cook the books.
It will be very strange if numbers aren't in red.

[–] billiam0202@lemmy.world 65 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Oh man, that would be so illegal! The SEC would surely step in to investigate that, right?

Right?

...right...?

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 21 points 2 weeks ago

We have looked at several book covers, and everything seems fine.

[–] cygnus@lemmy.ca 38 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 23 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Yes that's a very weird story, I'm looking forward to hear what the investigation reveals.

[–] stringere@sh.itjust.works 14 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Spoiler alert: it will only reveal that the US no longer honors extradition treaties.

[–] anomnom@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 weeks ago

Can you imagine what would happen if fElon visited Canada and the arrested him?

I’d like to imagine the good parts (Canada holding him accountable), and not the insane fascist parts (whatever stupid or dangerous threats our Cheeto Mussolini would make).

[–] bitchkat@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

They might pull an Oracle and stop reporting certain numbers and aggregate them with something else. Like when oracle stopped reporting cloud revenue as it's own line item.

[–] sp3tr4l@lemmy.zip 24 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

https://www.financecharts.com/compare/TSLA,TM/value/pe-ratio

So uh... Toyota's PE is almost 8, a bit down from its historical average of about 9 or 10.

Tesla's is currently about 115.

Down almost 50% from its highs around 200 during Jan 2025.

If Tesla's actual $$$ stock/share value dropped down to ... lets say a PE of 10... that would be... well ok it is currently still dropping rather rapidly, but lets say rightnnow its $225 per share.

If Tesla 'corrected' to a PE of 10, that's a share value of about $19.57.

About a 91% drop from where it is right now...

... which would wipe out around $700 billion of market cap.

These are ballpark figures based on a hypothetical scenario, this is not financial advice, but yeah, that is a way of looking at how overvalued Tesla is (or could be).

EDIT: Musk himself apparently owns about 410 million Tesla shares, as of Feb 2025.

https://www.investopedia.com/articles/insights/052616/top-4-tesla-shareholders-tsla.asp

So... a 91% reduction of 410m shares * $225 per share...

That would be a personal loss for Musk of about $82 billion, from this exact moment.

That'd put his net worth at about $273b, based on him having a net worth of $355b as of Feb 2025... but his net worth may already be significantly less than $355b, because Tesla has dropped a lot between the date of the source I've found for his net worth, and right now.

EDIT 2

https://www.forbes.com/profile/elon-musk/?list=rtb%2F&sh=7123ba5d7999

Uh wow yeah, ok, between Feb 28 2025 and Mar 18 2025, he's already lost about $34 billion... and is currently at $321 billion.

So... if you take $82 b out of $321, then he's down to around $240 ish.

Sadly... he would be the richest person in the world, even after that, he'd have to get below $210b ish to sink to #2 under Bezos, below about $200b to be #3, also under Zucky boy.

[–] Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (2 children)

And all this is without even taking into account the fall of the Earnings side of the P/E.

If Tesla sales keep falling that "correct" P/E or 10 won't be $19.57, it will be a lower number that keeps on falling along with the fall in sales because less sales means less earnings.

Even better: like all automakers Tesla has a lot of fixed capital costs which can't be easily shrinked (factories, equipment) so the fall in sales might actually push them below profitability since they will only be able to reduce costs in the short and mid term up to a point (it take time to sell a factory and the equipment in it)

If the company becomes unprofitable, it will need money from outside to keep going, and in an environment of quickly falling share prices that money is not going to come from outside investors and getting it from lenders using Tesla's own stock as collateral will be very difficult if not impossible.

A fast enough fall in sales right alongside a steep fall in stock price could bankrupt Tesla.

[–] skulblaka@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 weeks ago

If the company becomes unprofitable, it will need money from outside to keep going, and in an environment of quickly falling share prices [...]

Oh, oh, I know this one! The answer is "a government bailout!"

[–] sp3tr4l@lemmy.zip 2 points 2 weeks ago

Correct!

My hypothetical is greatly oversimplified... in a way that is arguably optimistic.

All very good other points to add... I've got a slowly healing but fucked up wrist/hand, so I can only type so much.

[–] Potatisen@lemmy.world 14 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

For someone who knows nothing about stocks, what is a P/E ratio?

[–] My_IFAKs___gone@lemmy.world 25 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

The price the market is willing to pay for one share of stock vs the amount of profit the company is making per share.

A P/E of 90 means someone is willing to pay $90 for a share of a company that is netting $1 of profit for each outstanding share it has.

[–] merc@sh.itjust.works 26 points 2 weeks ago

In terms of Tesla.

  • Tesla: 112
  • Amazon: 35
  • Microsoft: 31
  • Google: 20
  • GM: 7.7
  • Toyota: 7.4
  • BMW: 7.3
  • Honda: 6.9
  • Ford: 6.8
  • Mercedes-Benz: 5.8
  • Subaru: 5.4
  • Hyundai: 3.0

So, let's be incredibly generous and say that Tesla should have a P/E ratio that's similar to a well run auto company, like 7. For it to have that P/E ratio, its stock price should be about $14 per share, not $228. If Tesla lost 94% of its value, it would have a P/E ratio similar to a well-run car company that made good cars with an anonymous CEO that nobody hates.

But, just pretend it's a tech company, not a car company. (Bullshit, obviously, but just pretend.) It is still overvalued by a factor of 4-5 compared to other big tech companies.

Somebody's going to make mountains of money shorting Tesla stock. The problem is that markets can remain irrational longer than most people can remain solvent.

[–] empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com 15 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

And to add onto this, very high P/E ratios can often indicate a stock is artificially overvalued. Typical p/e's on the DJIA average out to around 20, and most companies will have P/E's between 5 to 30... a P/E of 90 indicates a huge, huge value bubble.

[–] My_IFAKs___gone@lemmy.world 9 points 2 weeks ago

BuT bUt BuT tHiNk AbOuT tHe MaSsIvE dIvIdEnD pOtEnTiAl WhEn ItS tEcH fUlLy MaTuReS! iT mAkEs Me FeEl LiKe I gEt To OwN sUm SpAcEx ToO!!!

[–] Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world 19 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Musk basically ate through the massive bump he got after Trump’s Nov 4th win.

The real pain for that stock is coming. It was already way overpriced before the election, and the speculators pumped it up even more.

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 8 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Also consider that if you bought the stock mid December 2020, it's the exact same value today!!!
That's a return to where it was more than 4 years ago. 😋

[–] Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Remember, they had a 5:1 split in Aug 2020 and a 3:1 split in Aug 2022.

If you bought in Dec 2020, your share volume tripled.

[–] keckbug@lemmy.world 11 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Every consumer stock ticker I’ve seen already factors those splits into the pricing scheme

[–] Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world 7 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)
[–] stringere@sh.itjust.works 6 points 2 weeks ago

Chin up, you're both more well versed this arcanery than I.

[–] MelodiousFunk@slrpnk.net 4 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

Good point. I ~~m a moron~~ made a mistake.

FTFY

[–] Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago

Damn Lemmy users and their damn empathy and compassion.

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago

Ah OK, I didn't know that.

[–] skozzii@lemmy.ca 11 points 2 weeks ago

It is the most overvalued stock in the world and its not even close.