this post was submitted on 18 Jul 2025
1009 points (98.4% liked)
Lemmy Shitpost
33272 readers
3553 users here now
Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.
Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!
Rules:
1. Be Respectful
Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.
Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.
...
2. No Illegal Content
Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.
That means:
-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals
-No CSA content or Revenge Porn
-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)
...
3. No Spam
Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.
-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.
-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.
-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers
-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.
...
4. No Porn/Explicit
Content
-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.
-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.
...
5. No Enciting Harassment,
Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts
-Do not Brigade other Communities
-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.
-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.
-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.
...
6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.
-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.
-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.
...
If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.
Also check out:
Partnered Communities:
1.Memes
10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)
Reach out to
All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I really hate their friends in the video. They’re all aware their friends are piece of shit cheaters, and they find it funny. “Haha we’re taking part in destroying a woman’s life by helping her husband cheat, hilarious!”
I mean theyre both married. Not sure why you're focusing on just the one piece of shit.
When I last read the story he was confirmed to be married but nobody knew anything about her. That’s why
That's the CEO and CPO, not her friends. She was recently promoted, possibly related to things like this
She's making tens of thousands more per year to be complicit. I've seen people do much worse for much less money
Dude I've audited Raytheon. I would like to validate every word of your second paragraph
CEOs don't have friends.
I think some of them were just coworkers.
There’s coworkers and there’s CEO talking certain employees who are aware of his cheating, to the Coldplay concert
And? They aren't necessarily friends
No sir, just because I was deeply involved in their private life and invited to an expensive event during my free time by and with them doesn't mean we're "friends". I barely know them!
The owners of my last company took us to a baseball game in an executive suite. Me attending the game did not in any way, shape, or form mean that I condone anything they do in their personal life.
Did those owners also bring their secret potentially marriage destroying affairs to those official events?
Is that relevant to whether or not attending constitutes condoning it?
I would not attend a concert if the tickets were given to me by my boss, who is openly going to cheat in front of me while I'm there. Is that wild to you?
Yeah, that's wild to me. Their personal life has nothing to do with me. Especially since not accepting could have a negative career impact.
And it's not like the invitation said, "come to the concert and watch me cheat." How would the other employees know that would be what would happen?
No, of course it didn't say that. But of course he doesn't invite people over who he can't trust with that kind of information. So his friends, closer allies or whatever you might call it. Imagine inviting someone over just to have them spill the beans to your family afterwards because you had the wrong impression of their loyalties and values. No way the people that were there weren't in on it.
Dude was cheating in a highly public place full of cameras. I think your assessment of the people there being part of his exclusive inner circle might be flawed.
Yeah, like Andrea Manafort said, they just keep showing up and eating the lobster
What's wrong with that? Of course they will side with their friends. If my friend is scheming and shares with me, I'm in! Being partners in crime is such a strong bonding experience.
People who help others cheat are shitty people
You're not wrong, but a lot of folks are better friends than they are good people.
Yeah those people can take a while to sniff out. It's difficult when someone is kind and generous with you, maybe even protective, but they lack empathy towards people who they consider outside of their very small kindness bubble.
Actually reminds me of this old article (checks date, wow, really old). Kind of related to Dunbar's number. It's pretty intuitive, but still some good reading.
Being partner in crime is a bonding experience if you do something that is morally right against a superior enemy. Not a group of guys ganging up on a women.
Woman. A woman. Women is plural.
Nah. Better to just cut untrustworthy people from your life.
Not if the friend is wrong. If they're really wrong then, I'll try to talk them out of it. If they're really really wrong, then I'll stop being their friend.
I don't like this kind of in-group/out-group clannish mentality -- that "right" is whatever the in-group decides, with no greater thought to what's like actually the best thing for everyone, whether they're in the group or not.
I hope that's sarcasm but I'm not sure.