this post was submitted on 05 Jul 2025
1358 points (96.0% liked)

Political Memes

8780 readers
4054 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

No AI generated content.Content posted must not be created by AI with the intent to mimic the style of existing images

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] IpsumLauren@lemmy.world 17 points 1 day ago (7 children)

The other four didn't vote because there wasn't a party against genocide.

[–] SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca 17 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Single issue voter is still committed to being uncommitted.

[–] Iceman@lemmy.world 1 points 5 hours ago

An issue easily adressed but stubbornly dismissed for no reason

[–] the_elder@midwest.social 14 points 1 day ago (5 children)

Electoral puritanism like this is a big part of why we now have concentration camps in America.

Thanks for that.

[–] skisnow@lemmy.ca 3 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)

Funny how Democrats never used to have to complain about Purity Tests back when they were doing things like attempting to pass universal healthcare. In fact I’d literally never even heard the phrase (in that context) before last year and suddenly it’s everywhere.

[–] MetalMachine@feddit.nl 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The camps already existed with Biden, Trump is just putting more money into them

[–] WoodScientist@sh.itjust.works 2 points 23 hours ago (2 children)

Yeah the downvotes you're getting really illustrate the three monkeys approach of centrists. Outright denial not only of opinions, but objective facts. Trump immigration policy is just Biden's turned up a notch, but with a lot of performative cruelty thrown in. Biden's immigration policy is just Trump's turned down a notch, with less performative cruelty. Trump vice signals, Biden virtue signaled. But their actual policies on immigration are very very similar.

[–] starman2112@sh.itjust.works 4 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago) (2 children)

Trump immigration policy is just Biden's turned up a notch, but with a lot of performative cruelty thrown in

So what you're saying is it's not just Biden's turned up a notch, he's doing it differently and much, much worse. The idea that, because both of them are immigration policies that include deportation, they must be the same thing is infantile

One of them is in favor of deporting all of the Latinos, but really it's the same policy lmao

[–] WoodScientist@sh.itjust.works 0 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Biden ran concentration camps. I'm sorry to have to inform you of this.

[–] starman2112@sh.itjust.works 1 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

I'm aware of this. Trump's are worse.

[–] WoodScientist@sh.itjust.works 0 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Your moral compass is broken.

[–] starman2112@sh.itjust.works 2 points 21 hours ago (2 children)

"Less suffering is preferable to more suffering" indicates a functioning moral compass

[–] WoodScientist@sh.itjust.works 0 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

You have no red lines. You would vote for Hitler if he was running against someone 1% worse. Again, your moral compass is broken.

[–] starman2112@sh.itjust.works 3 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago) (1 children)

Define "red line" for me. It really seems like you think that less suffering and more suffering are morally equivalent, which indicates a defective moral compass incapable of understanding magnitude. Either that, or you have a defective moral compass that allows you to extricate yourself from moral dilemmas by saying that, because you can't pick the option you wish you had, you're somehow justified in not picking the best available option.

In your little Hitler analogy, you think it's morally superior to let 60,000 more Jews die just to say "well, I'd prefer if we didn't kill any," and you're saying I have a broken moral compass. Please tell me if I'm wrong. I would genuinely prefer to know that you understand that it is a worse thing when more people die

[–] WoodScientist@sh.itjust.works -1 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

You moral compass is so broken you don't even know what a "red line" is.

You will excuse any crime, no matter how abominable, as long as your monster is running against someone you can convince yourself is a tiny bit worse.

A red line is saying, "no, fuck this. There are some things you just can't excuse. Both of these people belong in jail. I will not vote for either of them, as neither of these people are going to help. I'm voting for someone else and looking towards the next election."

Your ethics are actually highly aligned with those of the Nazis. They had no red lines. Everything was utilitarianism to them. The disabled had to be killed off because they were drains on society, and on a whole the greater good demanded they be liquidated. The greater good required the Nazis to kill the Jews, as the Nazis had a theory of history centered around racial conflict. Killing off the entire population of Eastern Europe was "the lesser of two evils" in their eyes.

Your ethics would fit right in at Hitler's table. You both care only of the greater good. Individuals have no innate value as human beings. Stalin, Hitler, and Pol Pot all share your ethical reasoning. They just measure the "greater good" different than you do. And that is precisely what makes them, and you, so unforgivably evil. The greater good leads nations straight to Hell.

[–] starman2112@sh.itjust.works 2 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago) (2 children)

A red line is saying, "no, fuck this. There are some things you just can't excuse. Both of these people belong in jail. I will not vote for either of them, as neither of these people are going to help. I'm voting for someone else and looking towards the next election."

So it's the "extricating yourself from moral dilemmas" kind of broken. The option you wanted wasn't on the ballot, so the entire world can burn for all you care. I don't want more people dead, and that's EXACTLY THE SAME as wanting all the disabled people and jews dead. I'd call you a clown but you're not even funny

"They all thought they were being good people, and so do you, which makes you evil like them" is such a weird take

[–] WoodScientist@sh.itjust.works -1 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

"But I don't understand, I voted for fascism lite the last 6 elections, why am I suddenly living under fascism?"

[–] starman2112@sh.itjust.works 2 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago) (1 children)

"Both options sell weapons to Israel so I'm not going to cast a vote for either of them. Oh no, why is abortion illegal? Why are trans people not allowed to legally update their gender? Why does ICE have a bigger budget than the Marines? Why are they deporting US citizens? Why did they cut the already barebones healthcare we have? Why are they bringing fucking asbestos back? Why is the Secretary of Health and Human Services in favor of spreading bird flu and against vaccines? Why are they actively deciding to give our kids cavities? Why has the Supreme Court decided that the president can violate the constitution? Why have they demolished every scientific institution in the country?"

[–] WoodScientist@sh.itjust.works 1 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Why? Because for decades Democrats have been ignoring all long term strategy and only voting for "the most important election ever." It's short term thinking that kills you in the long run. Republicans are much better at long term thinking than liberals like yourself.

[–] starman2112@sh.itjust.works 2 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Republicans are much better at long term thinking than liberals

I don't disagree. Unlike you though, I don't support the Republicans killing us in the short run

[–] someguy3@lemmy.world -1 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago)

JFC deporting people if their asylum claim fails isn't the same as what trump is doing. That you're trying to equate them is mind bogglingly bad. Anything to confuse the issue and say b b both sides same, huh. I recognize your name so I'm not going to reply further.

[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com -1 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

The puritanism is that both parties are fascist.

[–] starman2112@sh.itjust.works 3 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago) (1 children)

Both parties are equally bad, that's why we're letting 65 million Latinos get deported instead of not letting 65 million Latinos get deported. Less genocide is actually just as bad as more genocide

[–] starman2112@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

And those four are functionally equivalent to people who didn't vote because they're okay with either option

[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago) (1 children)

Genocide is much more like driving off a cliff than having ice cream or not voting.

It's kind of sad that I even have to say this.

[–] starman2112@sh.itjust.works 2 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago)

I mean if we want a better analogy, Harris represented the "crash the bus into a building" party, and Trump represented the "crash the bus into a building and explode" party. 3 people are voting for building, 4 people are voting for building and explode, and 4 people are saying "I don't care whether we explode."

One of those 4 thinks they're making some kind of statement by saying "I don't want to crash at all, so I won't be voting." He is indistinguishable from the 3 that just don't care

[–] lennybird@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

The other four didn't think this through because only one party had a subset of their coalition who opposed genocide, and also opposed 2 other genocides: the one Russia perpetrates against Ukraine, and climate change (leaving aside things like, you know, women's rights and LGBTQ+ rights... And not as a case-in-point the internal genocide of poor people when 50,000 Americans will now die from being dropped from Medicaid thanks to a bill that only ~~Republicans~~ the cliff-divers would have passed).

[–] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

When your main issue isn't on the ballot, it doesn't matter in the election.

[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com -2 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago) (1 children)

There's a genocide on the bus too?

Libs will tell the craziest stories just to avoid reality.

[–] PugJesus@lemmy.world 0 points 23 hours ago (2 children)

Libs will tell the craziest stories just to avoid reality.

"Avoiding reality is when you use literary devices that are so complex literal children can parse them."

I'm sorry that you can't quite grasp what an analogy is yet. I hope you continue your education at some point.