this post was submitted on 02 Jul 2025
188 points (93.5% liked)

No Stupid Questions

42012 readers
1537 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here. This includes using AI responses and summaries.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] solsangraal@lemmy.zip 22 points 2 days ago (6 children)

Violent protests

this is what the fascists want. any excuse whatsoever to declare martial law, impose curfews, 'papers, please' checkpoints, and 'papers, please' thugs going door to door, looking for anyone they don't like so they can send them to the concentration camp.

thoughtcrime doesn't entail death, thoughtcrime is death

[–] ryanee@fedia.io 32 points 2 days ago (3 children)

I keep hearing this so often "they will take any opportunity to declare martial law" this so often its starting to sound like autogenocide

collapsed inline media

[–] lurch@sh.itjust.works 15 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

yeah, that's a weak reason against violent protests. stronger ones are:

  • the violence is often misdirected at people not able to bring change, eg. small businesses or cars.
  • the violence exhausts protesters. many of them being crippled or killed by police, until the protests are suppressed by too few motivated protesters being left.

btw cops love violent protests. they get to kill maim and torture more people than usual. it's what many of them signed up for and look forward to with excitement. sometimes they have off duty cops in plain clothes infiltrating protesters to start the carnage. all it takes is throwing one stone near a collegue with shield and helmet to give him an excuse to go on a rampage against innocent protesters, while the infiltrator sneaks off

[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

that's a weak reason against violent protests. stronger ones are:

Non-violent ones are more effective, as per some study I saw a month or so back.

[–] Netux@lemmy.world 2 points 8 hours ago

There is an agenda in convincing people that non violence works. Take a real look at how unions and civil rights actually happened. The non violent get credit after the fact to control the narrative.

[–] Netux@lemmy.world 2 points 8 hours ago

Cops like it when it's them being violent. They don't do much when the opposition is armed and not concentrated in one small easily controlled area.

[–] Asafum@feddit.nl 11 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Hey where did they get that picture of me!?

[–] Daft_ish@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Better check your phone bro, I think they might be spying.

[–] ryanee@fedia.io 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

i thought @Asafum@feddit.nl knew, Asafum was waving at the wall just yesterday so i took a pic

collapsed inline media

[–] Maeve@kbin.earth 2 points 1 day ago

I really love this meme. The self-defeating attitude that's been perpetuated by team Dem of "We've tried nothing that could potentially be useful and are all out of ideas!” has been swallowed wholesale, by us. Will getting ourselves out of this trap be painful, disfiguring for some, deadly for others? Sure. The other option is self-suffocating, slowly. Drowning by self-waterboarding.

[–] Asafum@feddit.nl 24 points 2 days ago (1 children)

We're already at the thoughtcrime stage...

Funny how Republicans online were the ones crying about that, but now they're salivating at the idea of deporting Mamdani for the crime of being a socialist. Can't have those political opinions, that's wrongthink!

[–] Maeve@kbin.earth 0 points 2 days ago (2 children)
[–] Asafum@feddit.nl 14 points 2 days ago (1 children)

In fascist USA anyone not actively licking the boot of a billionaire is a socialist!

[–] Maeve@kbin.earth 6 points 2 days ago

Yeah that's the problem with American exceptionalists getting to redefine language: it doesn't work outside our walled garden, regardless whether the fruit is nourishment or poisonous.

[–] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

He calls himself one, do you have cause to doubt it?

[–] Maeve@kbin.earth 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I have cause to believe USA makes up their own meanings of words that has nothing to do with the rest of the world meaning. You can interpret that how you will.

[–] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I’m talking about Mamdani specifically though. Or are you just assuming that based on your feelings about the US in general?

[–] Maeve@kbin.earth -3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

And? I live here. I like Mamdani. That doesn't change the veracity of what I said. Perhaps your own feelings preclude that.

[–] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

I guess that’s a yes. I was genuinely curious to hear the case that he’s not a socialist but it doesn’t seem you have much basis for this opinion.

[–] Maeve@kbin.earth 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

I know what socialism means. I wanted to hear your interpretation of the facts regarding Mamdani, since this is a contentious topic, and socialism is a broad tradition. But I see now it was a waste of time to expect serious discourse from you.

[–] Maeve@kbin.earth 0 points 1 day ago

Good. Do your work bc I'm busy rn doing mine. Obviously that's the definition, which is obviously mine since reading about the US definition not being the definition is too much effort for you.

[–] Maeve@kbin.earth 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Last I heard, he was calling himself soc Dem or Dem soc, both of which uphold the capitalist class. He's proposing good work to make a few inroads but not proposing his potential constituency own the means of production which is the definition of socialism.

[–] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 2 points 1 day ago

For the record, he’s a democratic socialist, not a social democrat. These are distinct, though related movements. The difference between them, which you seem confused about, is that socialists do not uphold the capitalist class, despite your claims. Social democrats want to retain capitalism, while democratic socialists do not.

However, democratic socialists do have differences of opinion with more radical socialists on the best way to achieve the socialized means of production they aim for. They favor reform over revolution.

You are welcome to disagree with this view but it’s not a good reason to view their socialism as false or insincere.

No need to reply, since we already established that you’re not interested in good faith discourse. But I couldn’t leave this misinformation unchallenged.

That’s not a reason to avoid resistance. They created the situation. The violence is on them. Hopefully, literally.

[–] JandroDelSol@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

don't act like they're not going to do that anyway. if no one rises up and does real damage, they'll stage something and enact martial law

[–] Netux@lemmy.world 1 points 8 hours ago

They said it before trump was sworn in. It will be a bloodless coup of the left allows it. The options are fascism or fight.

[–] PunnyName@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

You can show up to a protest armed to the fucking teeth without firing off a single round. That's how those anti lockdown fucks got what they wanted in 2020 (and one of many reasons why COVID exploded).