this post was submitted on 16 Jun 2025
663 points (99.3% liked)

/r/50501 Mirror

1121 readers
1094 users here now


Mirrored /r/50501 Popular Posts


founded 3 months ago
MODERATORS
 

I wasn't sure it was the right choice at first, but I now realize it was brilliant.


Originally Posted By u/hook3m13 At 2025-06-15 07:50:05 PM | Source


you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] PanGodofPanic@lemmy.blahaj.zone 40 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Yes. In the rather famous case of the American Nazi party (like, the OGs before the GOP took over that status) in the 1970s when they wanted to hold a really in Skokie, a Jewish neighborhood of Chicago, were denied a permit on the basis of obvious harm, sued about it, and they ended up being represented by the ACLU on principle of free demonstration up to the Supreme Court where they won (and in turn the ACLU nearly collapsed from the popular fury at their willingness to do that). The case gained significant national attention and the people of Chicago organized a massive counterprotest to what ended up being a minimal Nazi turnout where they were unequivocally shamed and entirely unable to intimidate the Jewish locals they hated so much.

In short, counterprotests can be an act of solidarity against hatred. They have their time and place.

[–] dejected_warp_core@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

A more recent, however small, example were the countless Westboro Baptist Church (WBC) counter-protests. For the uninitiated, the WBC was a notoriously anti-LGBT hate group that staged many protests at funerals and other events. Once the internet caught wind of this, people began to counter-protest in greater numbers, leading to more and more public shaming of their hateful message.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Westboro_Baptist_Church#Counter-protests

[–] EldritchFeminity@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

Hell, even biker gangs got in on this and would show up at veteran's funerals to shield them from the WBC.

[–] dejected_warp_core@lemmy.world 2 points 21 hours ago

Right! There was a point in the middle of it where if you squinted your eyes and turned your head a little, you could almost believe that the WBC was trying to push people into organizing like this. Their whole thing was so over-the-top, it beggared belief sometimes.

[–] blindsight@beehaw.org 5 points 1 day ago

I think this is true, in general, for protests that are based in promoting prejudice. Counter-protesting bigots shows them that their hateful, closed-minded views are unpopular and unacceptable.

Locally, there was a big pushback against teaching inclusivity in schools (2SLGBTQ+ families being represented at all, basically), and a protest was organized. And across the street from them were literally 10× as many people counter protesting to support 2SLGBTQ+ rights. There hasn't been a single anti-tans bigots protest locally since.

"No tolerance for intolerance" is a powerful counter-protest message.

[–] JillyB@beehaw.org 3 points 11 hours ago

Wait is that what the Blues Brothers were referencing? When they were blocked by a bunch of demonstrating Nazis and ran them off the bridge saying "I hate Illinois Nazis". Didn't realize it was a reference