Try reading it instead. Go old school. And while you're at it, write yourself and share it. Bring back the times of hand to hand banned knowledge sharing.
But now seriously: that is completely stupid.
As anyone considered the amount of money that "industry" generates. Considering the US is so economy driven and concerned with jobs, maybe that argument can raise concerns.
At some point, it will be easier to just not have a phone.
It's achieveable if enough alcohol is added to the subject looking at the said painting. And with some exotic chemistry they may even start to taste or hear the colors.
It was an abomination.
Dark bread (wheat/rye mix), homemade, mustard, mortadela, cheese, letuce and a slice of tomato.
Fit it's role.
I want to but many artists are abandoning the format.
Personal preference.
I like to buy and keep something. So beside the network coverage issues I face, I prefer to buy and keep my copies in my home, to listen wherever and whenever I want, without the need for an app or something alike to make sure the music I paid for actually plays.
Call me old fashioned.
For reasons unknown, I've had 3 separate accounts on that site shut down. I'm done with them.
There is one artist on Bandcamp whose work I want to get but I understand Bandcamp is more geared towards indie musicians.
Is this true?
For health reasons, nothing to object. For pure vanity, it makes no sense.
That I am a functioning human. Several conspired against it over the years.
I thought we had already invented that one. In two separate version. The first was the bathtub and the revised one being the shower booth.
I just got served with this. It is a real novelty item.
Because this needs to be a regular thing, come forward warriors and announce the feats you have achieved! For the glory of the Empire!
That's the point.
You, as a common citizen, should not have to. But the moment you feel like to share your thought or opinion, you should be identifiable and made responsible for it.
The current social media outlets shield behind the argument they act solely as channels while at the same time fostering and allowing for "anonymous" groups or individuals to spout whatever views they want, often views that deter from advancing social and civilizational progress. Hence the current state of the world, with authoritarianism on a rise and hight like there wasn't in nearly 70 years.
When the internet was made of individual websites, the person behind it was automatically made responsible for whatever they put on it. That was fair and reasonable.
Pushes like this, is assigning suspition/guilt before any wrong doing.
I will grant the overall facilitated acess to pornography is damaging the kids. There are already enough studies showing how the early access to porn is related to bad interpersonal relations on social, emotional and sexual level.
But this does not imply you should be identifying yourself to access adult content or anything on the web. Just impose curation. If it's available to the public, you're responsible for it.
Old school "dirty" books and magazines stores had controlled access and the really hardcore stuff was well out of reach of who should not get to it. Free porn is nice but there are things available that should be behind pay walls or at least registry, with identity verification.